Thursday, 30, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajeshwar Rajendrakumar ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And ...
2017 Latest Caselaw 1674 Bom

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 1674 Bom
Judgement Date : 12 April, 2017

Bombay High Court
Rajeshwar Rajendrakumar ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And ... on 12 April, 2017
Bench: R.M. Borde
                                                                          WP 4978.odt
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                         BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                           WRIT PETITION NO. 4978 2017

1. Rajeshwar S/o Rajendrakumar 
   Adbalwar,
   Age: 12 years,Occu:Student,
2. Pandurang S/o Rajendrakumar 
   Adbalwar,
   Age:11 years,Occu:Student,

        Both minors, through their 
        Father-
        Rajendrakumar S/o Rajba Adbalwar,
        Age:36 years, Occu.:Agril,
        R/o:Udgir,(PD),Tq.:Mukhed,
        Dist.:Nanded.                     ... Petitioners.


        VERSUS

1.  The State of Maharashtra
    Through its Secretary,
    Tribal Development Department,
    Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.

2.      The Sub-Divisional Officer,
        Degloor,Dist.:Nanded.

3.      The Tahsildar,
        Mukhed,Dist.:Nanded.
4.      The Head Master,
        Shri Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj
        Army School,Awalkonda Raod,
        Udgir,Tq.: Udgir,Dist.Latur.                 ... Respondents.


Mr. Pratap G. Rodge, Advocate for Petitioners 
Mrs. M. A. Deshpande, Addl.GP for Respondents State    

                                    CORAM   :  R. M. BORDE & 
                                                K. L. WADANE, JJ.
                                     DATE   :   12th April, 2017

                                                                                       1/4

     ::: Uploaded on - 18/04/2017                 ::: Downloaded on - 19/04/2017 00:26:10 :::
                                                                  WP 4978.odt
JUDGMENT (Per R. M. Borde, J.):               

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the

consent of the parties, taken up for final disposal.

2. At the request of learned counsel for the

petitioner, name of respondent No.4 stands deleted.

3. The petitioners have approached this Court being

aggrieved by order passed by the Sub Divisional

Officer, Degloor dated 17.03.2017 refusing to issue

caste certificate as belonging to Mannervarlu Scheduled

Tribe. The application tendered by the petitioners on

21.09.2016 to the Tahsildar was not being forwarded to

the Sub Divisional Officer for issuance of Tribe

Certificate. The petitioners were required to approach

this Court by presenting writ petition No.2027/2017.

Writ petition was disposed of on 14.02.2017 and

Tahsildar was directed to forward application to the

Sub Divisional officer and the Sub Divisional Officer

was further directed to take decision within four

weeks. The Sub Divisional Officer, instead of perusing

the documents placed on record by the petitioners for

substantiating their claim, including validity

certificates of their blood relations, has turned down

the application for issuance of tribe certificates.

WP 4978.odt

4. It has been observed by this Court in number of

judgments that the authority vested with power to

issue caste/tribe certificate has to take decision on

prima facie satisfaction as regards the claim of the

applicant. Certificate issuing authority is not

expected to go into details, which aspects can be

considered wile determining validation claim of the

applicant.

5. The caste certificate issued by the competent

authority is subject to verification by the scrutiny

committee and the applicant requesting for issuance

of caste certificate is not entitled to claim benefits

in the matter of education or employment unless he

produces validation certificate. In the instant

matter, there is sufficient prima facie evidence

placed on record by the petitioners entitling them to

claim Tribe certificates. The Sub Divisional Officer

has committed material illegality in turning down the

application tendered by the petitioners for issuance of

caste certificate.

6. In this view of the matter, the order passed by

the Sub Divisional Officer on 17.03.2017 is quashed

and set aside.

WP 4978.odt

7. The Sub Divisional Officer, Degloor is directed

to issue tribe certificates to the petitioners as

expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of

two weeks from today.

8. With the directions as above, writ petition is

disposed of. Rule is accordingly made absolute. In

the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be

no order as to costs.

(K. L. WADANE, J.)                   (R. M. BORDE, J. ) 


JPC







 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter