Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 2271 Bom
Judgement Date : 4 May, 2016
apl72.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Criminal Application [APL] No. 72 of 2016
Sumit Vijay Bone,
aged 26 years,
occupation - Agriculturist,
resident of Gandhi Nagar,
Amravati,
Distt. Amravati. ig ..... Applicant.
Versus
1. State of Maharashtra,
through Police Station
Officer, Police Station,
Rajapeth, Amravati.
2. Shailendra Gangadharrao
Navathe,
aged 55 years,
occupation - Business,
resident of Navathe Plot,
Badnera Road,
Distt. Amravati. .... Respondents.
*****
Mr. Pankaj Navlani, Adv., for the Applicant.
Mr. Ghurde, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the respondent no.1.
Mr. Roshan Suryawanshi, Adv., for respondent no.2.
*****
::: Uploaded on - 05/05/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 30/07/2016 00:53:33 :::
apl72.16
2
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND
MRS. SWAPNA S. JOHI, JJ.
Date : 04th May, 2016
ORAL JUDGMENT [Per B. R. Gavai, J.]:
01. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Learned Additional
Public Prosecutor Mr. Ghurde, waives service for respondent no.1, and
learned Adv. Mr. Roshan Suryawanshi, Adv., for respondent no.2.
Heard learned counsel for the rival parties. By consent of rival parties,
this Criminal Application is taken up for final hearing and disposed of
by this Judgment and Order.
02. By the present application, the applicant has approached
this Court with a prayer to quash and set aside First Information Report
No. 96/2015 for offences punishable under Sections 120, 420, 463, 468
and 471 of Indian Penal Code, registered by Respondent No.1 -
Rajapeth Police Station, Amravati, against the applicant.
03. The First Information Report, in question, is lodged at the
behest of respondent no.2 with regard to certain mutation entries in
the revenue records.
apl72.16
04. It appears that there was a transaction between the parties
with respect to purchase of some property. The First Information
Report, in question, is an outcome of such transaction.
05. The learned counsel for the parties inform that the parties
have now settled the matter. The applicant as well as the respondent
no.2 are personally present before this Court and they reiterate about
the settlement.
06. In the light of the Judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the
case of Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab & another
[ (2014) 6 SCC 466 ], we find that since the present dispute is basically
of a civil nature and no element of public law is involved, it is a fit case
where this Court should exercise powers under Section 482, Criminal
Procedure Code, and give an end to the criminal proceedings.
07. Rule is, therefore, made absolute in terms of Prayer Clause
[a].
Judge Judge
-0-0-0-0-
|hedau|
apl72.16
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!