Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Janardhan Gopalrao Kapse And ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And ...
2016 Latest Caselaw 519 Bom

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 519 Bom
Judgement Date : 10 March, 2016

Bombay High Court
Janardhan Gopalrao Kapse And ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And ... on 10 March, 2016
Bench: R.M. Borde
                                          1                     WP NO.2887/2016

             
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY




                                                                           
                        BENCH AT AURANGABAD




                                                   
                        WRIT PETITION NO.2887 OF 2016

      1.       Janardhan s/o Gopalrao Kapse,
               Age 63 years, Occu. Retired Employee,
               R/o. Jangda-Nagar, Bhokardan Road,




                                                  
               Jalna.

      2.       Trimbak s/o Girjaji Nikam,
               Age 66 years, Occu. Retired Employee,




                                        
               r/o. Kothari-Nagar, Bhokardan Road,
               Jalna.

      3.
                             
               Smt.Jijabai w/o Trimbak Mali,
               Age 62 years, Occu.Nil,
               r/o. Fire Station, Deulgaon Raja Road,
                            
               Jalna.

                                               ...PETITIONERS
                       VERSUS
      


      1.       The State of Maharashtra,
   



               Through: Director of Municipal Administration,
               State Transport Service Building, 3rd Floor,
               Sir Pochkhanwala Road, Worli,
               Mumbai 400 030





      2.       The Divisional Commissioner,
               Aurangabad.

      3.       The District Collector,
               Jalna, Dist. Jalna.





      4.       The President, Municipal Council,
               Jalna, Dist. Jalna.

      5.       The Municipal Council, Jalna,
               Through its Chief Officer.

                                               ...RESPONDENTS

                                         ...




    ::: Uploaded on - 18/03/2016                   ::: Downloaded on - 31/07/2016 08:27:30 :::
                                                2                    WP NO.2887/2016

      Mr.Suresh M.Kulkarni, Advocate for petitioners. 
      Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, AGP for respondent State.




                                                                               
      Mr. H. K.Munde, Advocate, for respondent nos. 4 
      and  5.




                                                       
                                              ...
                                    CORAM: R.M.BORDE
                                            AND




                                                      
                                          P.R.BORA, JJ.

DATE : March 10th, 2016

***

ORAL JUDGMENT: (Per R.M.Borde, J.)

1. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable and heard

forthwith with the consent of learned Counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioners are retired employees of the

Municipal Council, Jalna, and are making grievance in respect of

the failure of the respondent employer to pay retiral benefits

admissible to the employees, which are overdue.

3. The total liability computed by the petitioners is to

the tune of Rs.5,10,831/-. The Municipal Council has not

disputed the liability, however, has contended that considering

the financial constraints, and looking at the prevailing drought

situation in the district, the funds are required to be diverted for

enforcement of water supply scheme with a view to provide

3 WP NO.2887/2016

drinking water to the residents of Jalna.

4. It is no doubt true that the Municipal Council has to

take up the issue of providing drinking water to the citizens

residing within the municipal area on priority basis and major

funds are required to be diverted for the aforesaid purpose,

however, the petitioners are retired employees and the only

source of their livelihood is the retiral benefits to which they are

legally entitled to.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances, we deem

it appropriate to direct the respondent Municipal Council to pay

the dues receivable by the petitioners within a period of six

months from today.

Considering the financial constraints put forth by the

Municipal Council, we deem it appropriate to direct the

Municipal Council to pay interest on the amount receivable by

the petitioners at the rate of six per cent per annum from the

date of their entitlement to the amount till the date of receipt.

The respondents are, as such, directed to pay the

admissible dues to the petitioners as expeditiously as possible,

preferably, within a period of six months from today, together

with interest at the rate of six per cent, per annum, from the

4 WP NO.2887/2016

date of their entitlement to the amount till the date of payment.

Rule is made absolute accordingly. There shall be no

order as to costs.

                 (P.R.BORA)                (R.M.BORDE)
                    JUDGE                     JUDGE

                                    ...




                                    
      AGP/2887-16wp 
                             
                            
      
   







 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter