Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chief Executive Officer, & ... vs Bhausaheb Vishnu Bhonde
2016 Latest Caselaw 7246 Bom

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 7246 Bom
Judgement Date : 15 December, 2016

Bombay High Court
Chief Executive Officer, & ... vs Bhausaheb Vishnu Bhonde on 15 December, 2016
Bench: R.V. Ghuge
                                                                       WP/3286/1997
                                             1

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                               BENCH AT AURANGABAD




                                                                               
                              WRIT PETITION NO. 3286 OF 1997




                                                       
     1. The Chief Executive Engineer,
        Zilla Parishad,
        Ahmednagar.




                                                      
     2. The Executive Engineer,
        Minor Irrigation,
        South Division,
        Zilla Parishad,
        Ahmednagar                                               - PETITIONERS




                                           
     VERSUS                  
     Bhausaheb Vishnu Bhonde,
     Age - 41 years, Occu-Service,
     R/o Newasa, Tq. Newasa,
                            
     Dist.Ahmednagar                                             - RESPONDENT
                                            ...
                         Advocate for Petitioner : Shri S.T.Shelke
                                            ...
      


                              CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

Dated: December 15, 2016

...

ORAL JUDGMENT:-

1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the ex-parte ad-interim order

dated 25.7.1989 passed by the Industrial Court, by which, notice was

issued to the petitioner and liberty was granted to appear in the

Court and file the written statement.

2. While admitting this petition, this Court granted interim relief

in terms of prayer clause (C) to the petitioner, thereby, staying the

ex-parte ad-interim relief.

WP/3286/1997

3. None has appeared for the respondent.

4. I have heard Shri Shelke and have gone through the petition

paper book with his assistance.

5. The ex-parte ad-interim order passed by the Industrial Court,

while issuing notice to the petitioner / original respondent, has been

stayed by this Court for the past more than 19 years.

6. In the light of the above, this petition is partly allowed and

the interim order of this Court is continued for the period of six

months. The Industrial Court at Ahmednagar shall decide Complaint

(ULP) No.246 of 1989, on it's own merits, if not already decided,

within the period of six months from today.

7. Needless to state, if the complaint is already decided, this

interim relief shall stand vacated as the parties would be bound by

the final judgment of the Industrial Court. If the complaint is not

decided, this interim relief shall lose it's efficacy after the complaint

is decided by the Industrial Court or within six months from today,

whichever is earlier.

WP/3286/1997

8. Rule is made partly absolute in the above terms.

( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) ...

akl/d

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter