Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 vs Unknown
2012 Latest Caselaw 287 Bom

Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 287 Bom
Judgement Date : 30 October, 2012

Bombay High Court
Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 vs Unknown on 30 October, 2012
Bench: J.P. Devadhar, M.S. Sanklecha
     ASN                          1/10                        ITXA-602-11.doc

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
               ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION




                                                                    
                 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.602 OF 2011




                                           
     Commissioner of Income Tax-2,
     Aayakar Bhavan, M.K.Road,
     Mumbai- 400 020.                                ..Appellant.




                                          
                    v.
     Upendra T. Kapadia,
     Laxmi Niwas,
     37, L. Jagmohandas Marg,
     Mumbai-400036.                                  ..Respondent.




                                 
                    
     Mr. Vimal Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Padma Divakar for the
     Appellant.
     Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the Respondent.
                   
                          CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND
                                   M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
      


                          DATE       : 30TH OCTOBER, 2012
   



     JUDGMENT ( PER M.S. SANKLECHA, J.):

This appeal by the revenue under Section 260 A of

the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act") is against the order dated

26/10/2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ("the

Tribunal") relating to the assessment year 2004-05.

      ASN                         2/10                        ITXA-602-11.doc

     2)         Being aggrieved, the following questions of law have

been formulated by the appellant for the consideration by this

Court.

A) Whether on the facts and in the

circumstances of the case and in law the

Tribunal was justified in deleting the dis-

allowance of Rs.52,85,205/- made by the

Assessing Officer u/s. 43B of the Income Tax Act

being interest payable by the assessee to Shree

Mahalaxmi Mercantile Co-operative Bank

Limited even though there was no evidence

furnished by the assessee to substantiate the

claim that the assessee had made the payment

of interest before the filing of his return of

income?

B) Whether on the facts and in the

circumstances of the case and in law the

Tribunal was justified in holding that Shree

ASN 3/10 ITXA-602-11.doc

Mahalaxmi Mercantile Co-operative Bank Ltd. is

not a scheduled bank within the meaning of

Section 43B and Section-11(5) of the Income Tax

Act even though the said Shree Mahalaxmi

Mercantile Co-operative Bank Limited is a co-

operative society which is engaged in banking

and thus the provisions of section 43B(e) will not

apply to the assessee?

3) The appeal is admitted on questions (a) and (b). At the

request of the Advocates for the appellant and the respondent the

appeal is itself taken up for final hearing.

4) The respondent-assessee is an individual engaged in

the business of trading in cotton bales. For the assessment year

2004-05, the respondent-assessee filed his return of income

declaring a loss of Rs.61.38 lacs. In his return the respondent

assessee had claimed a deduction/expense on account of interest

of Rs.52.85 lacs payable by him to Shree Mahalaxmi Mercantile

Co-operative Bank Limited on a loan taken. During the course of

ASN 4/10 ITXA-602-11.doc

the assessment proceedings the Assessing Officer noticed that

the aforesaid amount of interest of Rs.52.85 lacs had not been

actually paid even upto the date of filing of return of income for the

assessment year 2004-05. Consequently, the Assessing Officer in

his assessment order dated 30/11/2006 disallowed the

deduction/expenses claimed by the assessee on account of

interest of Rs.52.85 lacs under Section 43B of the Act and added

it back to the income of the assessee.

5) Being aggrieved, the respondent-assessee filed an

appeal to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). By an order

dated 25/9/2008, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)

dismissed the respondent-assessee's appeal on the ground that it

is an admitted position that the interest of Rs.52.85 lacs had not

been paid to Shree Mahalaxmi Mercantile Co-operative Bank

Limited upto the date of filing of the return. In the circumstances,

on application of Section 43B of the Act the order of the

Assessing Officer dated 30/11/2006 was upheld.



     6)          On second appeal, the Tribunal by its order dated





      ASN                            5/10                        ITXA-602-11.doc

26/10/2009 held that Section 43B of the Act would not apply in

case of payment of interest to a co-operative bank for the reason

that the section is applicable only in respect of interest payable on

a loan taken from a scheduled bank. Under terms of Explanation

4(aa) to Section 43B of the Act a scheduled bank would have a

meaning assigned to it in the Explanation to clause (iii) of sub

section 5 of Section-11 of the Act. The Tribunal held that Shree

Mahalaxmi Mercantile Co-operative Bank Ltd. is not covered

within the definition of scheduled bank under Section 43B of the

Act. Thus, the appeal of the respondent-assessee was allowed.

7) Mr. Vimal Gupta, Senior Counsel appearing for the

revenue in support of the appeal submits that there is no dispute

that the amount of interest has not been actually paid by the

respondent-assessee to Shree Mahalaxmi Mercantile Co-

operative Bank Limited up to the date of filing of the return for the

assessment year 2004-05. Further, he contends that a co-

operative bank being a co-operative society would be covered

within the meaning of scheduled bank under Section-43B of the

Act read with Section 11(5) (iii) of the Act. In the circumstances

ASN 6/10 ITXA-602-11.doc

he contends that the deduction/expenses of Rs.52.85 lacs being

the interest payable to Shree Mahalaxmi Mercantile Co-

operative Bank Limited is not allowable in view of the bar under

Section 43B of the Act. As against the above, Mr. Atul Jasani,

Advocate for the respondent-assessee submits that though there

is no dispute about the non payment of interest till the date of

filing of the return, the same is not germane to the controversy at

hand. Mr. Jasani submits that Section 43B of the Act is not

applicable to the payment of interest made to Shree Mahalaxmi

Mercantile Co-op. Bank Ltd. In support of his submission, he

relies upon an order of the Tribunal dated 26/10/2009 and states

that no substantial question of law arises and the appeal be

dismissed.

8) We may usefully reproduce the relevant portion of

Section-43B of the Act and Section 11(5)(iii) of the Act for an

appropriate adjudication of the present controversy. The relevant

portion of Section 43B of the Act reads as under:

"Certain deductions to be only on actual payment.

ASN 7/10 ITXA-602-11.doc

43B. Notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of this Act, a deduction otherwise allowable under this Act in respect

of-

(a) ......

(b) ......

(c) ......

(d) .....or

(e) any sum payable by the assessee as interest or any loan or advances from a scheduled bank in accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreement governing such loan or advance or

(f) any sum payable by the assessee as an employer in lieu of any leave at the credit of his

employee,

shall be allowed (irrespective of the previous

year in which the liability to pay such sum was incurred by the assessee according to the method of accounting regularly employed by him) only in computing the income referred to

in section 28 of that previous year in which such sum is actually paid by him.

Explanation 4-For the purposes of this section.-

(a) "public financial institution " shall have the meaning assigned to it in section 4A of the

Companies Act, 1956 ( 1 of 1956); (aa) "scheduled bank "shall have the meaning assigned to it in the Explanation to clause (iii) of sub-section (5) of section 11;

Section 11(5)(iii) of the Act is reproduced along with the explanation as under:

(iii) deposit in any account with a scheduled bank or a co-operative society engaged in carrying on the business of banking (including

ASN 8/10 ITXA-602-11.doc

a co-operative land mortgage bank or a co-

operative land development bank).

Explanation- In this clause, "scheduled bank"

means the State Bank of India constituted under the State Bank of India Act, 1955 (23 of

1955), a subsidiary bank as defined in the State Bank of India (Subsidiary Banks) Act, 1959 (38 of 1959), a corresponding new bank constituted under section 3 of the Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5 of 1970), or under section 3 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 (40 of 1980) or any other bank being a

bank included in the Second Schedule to the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 ( 2 of 1934);"

From the reading of the above sections, it is amply

clear that Section 43B of the Act is applicable only in respect of

any amount paid as interest to a scheduled bank. A scheduled

bank as defined in Explanation 4 to Section 43B of the Act would

have the same meaning as contained in the Explanation to

Section 11(5) (iii) of the Act. The Explanation to Section 11(5)(iii)

of the Act defines a scheduled bank to mean various banks

referred to therein i. e. State Bank of India, its subsidiaries,

Nationalized Banks and any bank included in the second schedule

to Reserve Bank of India Act, 1924. The Shree Mahalaxmi Co. op.

ASN 9/10 ITXA-602-11.doc

Bank Ltd. Is not mentioned in the second schedule to the Reserve

Bank of India Act, 1934 nor covered by any other Banks

mentioned to the Explanation to Section 11(5)(iii) of the Act.

Consequently, the Tribunal was correct in its conclusion that non

payment of interest amount to a co-operative bank would not

attract the provisions of Section 43B of the Act. This is for the

reason that in terms of Explanation (4) to Section 43B of the said

Act scheduled bank would have a meaning given to it in the

Explanation to Section 11(5)(iii) of the Act. Therefore, one has to

merely look at the Explanation to Section 11(5)(iii) of the Act to

determine whether or not Shree Mahalaxmi Mercantile Co-

operative Bank limited is included within the meaning of a

Scheduled Bank. Sub Clause (iii) of sub section 5 of Section 11

speaks about the deposit of any amount in a scheduled bank or

co-operative Society engaged in banking but the same is of no

consequence. This is for the reason that for purposes of Section

43B of the Act we would be governed by the meaning given in the

explanation to Section 11(5) (iii) of the Act and not by the main

part thereof. Therefore, no fault can be found with the order of the

Tribunal dated 26/10/.2009.

      ASN                            10/10                       ITXA-602-11.doc




     9)           In view of the above clear position of law both the




                                                                      

questions of law (a) and (b) are answered in the affirmative i. e. in

favour of the respondent-assessee and against the appellant

-revenue.

10) Appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.

(M.S.SANKELCHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter