Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9145 AP
Judgement Date : 3 October, 2024
1
APHC010434812024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3310]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 22115/2024
Between:
Bhaskarla Venkata Bala Krishna, ...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VELADI SAI SRI HARSHA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
seeking the following relief:
".....to declare the action of the Respondent no.4 in issuing impugned notice dated 03.09.2024 without following due procedure of law and further threatening the petitioner to vacate the land as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to law and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner over the land to an extent of Ac.0.15 Cents situated at R.S.No.522/3 of Nandigama Town and Mandal, NTR district in the interest of justice."
2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the owner of the land
to an extent of Ac.0.15 cents in R.S.No.522/3 of Nandigama Town and
Mandal, having purchased the same in the year 2014 through a registered
sale deed vide Document No.12057 of 2014, dated 20.10.2014 from one Sri
Chevendra Rajasekhara Sarma and since then he has been in possession
and enjoyment of the same by paying the taxes to the Municipal authorities.
While so, in the year 2023, the respondent authorities tried to interfere
highhandedly with his possession, aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has
filed W.P.No.14703 of 2023 before this Court, wherein this Court disposed of
the said writ petition with a direction to the petitioner to approach the
Endowments Tribunal. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred writ
appeal vide W.A.No.839 of 2023, wherein the Division Bench of this Court
observed that since the respondent authorities did not follow the due
procedure of law, this Court granted status quo on spot till the competent
authority issues notice.
3. While the matter stood thus, without serving a notice on the petitioner
as per the direction of this Court in W.A.No.839 of 2023, on 03.09.2024 the 4th
respondent pasted a notice to the wall of the said property and directed the
petitioner to submit explanation, failing which, appropriate action will be taken
by the 4th respondent and further threatened to take forceful possession of the
said land. Further stated that even as per the report of the 3rd respondent
dated 23.04.2021, the said land is not a part of temple land and as per the
entries of RSR, the land in question is a gramakantam land, but not temple
land, as such, the 4th respondent has no right to issue any notice to the
petitioner. Hence the writ petition.
4. Heard Mr.V.Sai Sri Harsha, learned counsel for the petitioner and
Ms.P.Sudeepthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments,
appearing for the respondents 1 to 3.
5. Perused the material on record.
6. On perusal of the judgment in W.A.No.839 of 2023, the Division Bench
of this Court held at para 11, which reads as under:
"Be that as it may, while we do not find any merit in the present appeal and are of the opinion that the remedy of the parties would be before the concerned Tribunal which has been constituted by the Government in terms of Section 162 of the Act of 1987, which can exercise the powers which are otherwise vested in it under Section 87 of the said Act, as amended/ substituted by the Ordinance bearing No.5/2023 dated 23.06.2023. However, till such time as the competent authority issues a notice in terms of newly substituted Section 83(2) of the Act of 1987, status quo be maintained on spot."
7. As per the above judgment, status quo was granted and the
respondents are constrained to issue a notice under Section under Section
83(2) of Act 30 of 1987. Accordingly, the 4th respondent has issued statutory
notice under the said Act and directed the petitioner to submit his explanation
within seven days from the date of receipt of the notice along with the
documentary evidence, if any, failing which, appropriate action will be taken as
per the provisions of Section 83 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu
Religious Institutions and Endowments Act 30 of 1987.
8. On hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the
respondents without serving any notice on the petitioner, affixed the notice on
the compound wall of the property to an extent of Ac.0.15 cents in
R.S.No.522/3 of Nandigama Town and Mandal. But as seen from the cause
title of the writ petition, the petitioner is residing in Vijayawada.
9. Having regard to the submissions made by both the learned counsel for
the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments, it
is suffice to direct the petitioner to appear before the 4th respondent and file
his explanation within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of a
copy of this order and on receipt of such explanation, the respondent
authorities shall pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, within a
period of six (06) weeks. Till such time, the respondents are directed not to
take any coercive steps against the petitioners.
10. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall
be no order as to costs.
11. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand
closed.
_________________________ DR. K. MANMADHA RAO, J.
ARR
HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
Writ Petition No.22115 of 2024 Date: 03.10.2024
ARR
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!