Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5411 AP
Judgement Date : 9 November, 2023
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
M.A.C.M.A.No.1238 OF 2016
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. OFFICE
DATE ORDER
No. NOTE
06. 09.11.2023 AVRB,J:
I.A.No.1 of 2022
This application is filed by the
petitioner, who wanted to come on record in
the place of respondent No.1/original
claimant who died during the pendency of the M.A.C.M.A.
The cause set up by the petitioner is that the respondent No.1/original claimant died during the COVID Pandemic and in view of the benefit of limitation and judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court, though the petitioner filed earlier the abatement set aside petition and condone delay petition, they were not pressed.
Learned counsel for the appellant will have no objection.
In the light of the facts and circumstances, the material available on record shows that the present petitioner is no other than the legal representative of the respondent No.1/original claimant.
Considering the same, the petition is allowed, bringing the petitioner as the respondent No.2 in M.A.C.M.A., as the legal representative of the respondent No.1/original claimant who died during the pendency of the M.A.C.M.A.
Let the Registry to carry out necessary amendments.
M.A.C.M.A.No.1238 OF 2016
List the matter after one (1) week.
_________ AVRB,J
MH
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!