Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2439 AP
Judgement Date : 25 April, 2023
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
MAIN CASE No:W.P.No.10389 OF 2023
PROCEEDING SHEET
SL. DATE ORDER OFFICE
NO. NOTE
RNT,J
1. 25.04.2023
Sri Dr. S. Ananth, learned counsel for the
petitioners submits that the petitioners are
challenging Clause 9 of G.O.Ms.No.35, dated
08.04.2021 issued by the 1st respondent in so far as
it allows the owners and operators of the Multiplex Cinemas and other theatres to fix and collect parking fees from cine goers. He submits that the said clause is contrary to the judgment of this Court in W.P.Nos.1180 of 2003 & Batch, decided on 02.05.2003. However, a perusal of G.O.Ms.No.35 shows that the said G.O.Ms has been issued, in compliance of the order of this Court in W.P.No.18779 of 2014 & Batch.
2. Without expressing any opinion at this stage, the matter can be considered effectively only after counter affidavit is filed by the respondents.
3. Issue notice to the 3rd respondent.
4. Let the counter affidavit be filed by the respondents within a period of two (02) weeks.
5. If counter affidavit is filed, the reply/rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within a further period of two (02) weeks.
SL. DATE ORDER OFFICE
NO. NOTE
6. List on 04.07.2023.
7. It has also been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that some appeal is pending in the National Consumer Redressal Commission filed by the 3rd respondent, in which the petitioner No.1 is also party.
8. It is clarified that the proceedings of the pending appeal, shall not be effected merely because of pendency of the petition.
________ RNT,J Scs/Kkv
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!