Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8823 AP
Judgement Date : 17 November, 2022
BSS,J
S.A.No.165 of 2007
1
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE BANDARU SYAMSUNDER
I.A.No.1 of 2022 IN/AND
SECOND APPEAL No.165 of 2007
JUDGMENT:
The learned counsel for appellant No.2 Mr.K.Satyanandam,
represented the case. The learned Senior Counsel Mr.Y.Srinivasa
Murthy, represented for 1st respondent/plaintiff. Both counsels have
represented that matter has been compromised between the parties
and the terms stated in Memorandum of Compromise also complied
with.
2. In I.A.No.1 of 2022 in S.A.No.165 of 2007, the appellants and the
respondent are praying this Court to record the compromise in terms of
Memorandum of Compromise, dated 28.09.2022 and dispose of the
appeal. The terms of said memorandum of compromise read as follows:
1.The second respondent who has now become the Legal Representative of the deceased sole appellant herein admit and agree that the document of cancellation of the earlier transaction executed and registered, thereby in her favour by the deceased appellant herein is a pendente lite transaction and is not valid and therefore the consequential documents and the revenue entries including the issuance of Pattadar pass book and Title deed in her favour is null and void;
2. The 2nd respondent who has now become the Legal Representative of the deceased sole appellant herein agreed BSS,J S.A.No.165 of 2007
and accepted to execute and register a regular sale deed of the aforesaid document for an extent of about Ac.1.00 situate in S.No.67-6 of Panchalavaram Village, Amarthaluru in favour of the 1st respondent or his nominee thereby negating the effect of a pendente lite transaction and also agree and admit that she shall give No-Objection letter for incorporation of the name of the 1st respondent or his nominee in all relevant revenue records including cooperating for issuance of a new Pattadar Pass Book and Title Deed and that she or her legal heirs or nominees shall have no objection whatsoever for the same;
3. The 1st respondent through his nominee shall pay a sum of Rs.7,00,000/- to the 2nd respondent who has now become the Legal Representative of the deceased sole appellant herein in full and final settlement of all her claims whatsoever in respect of the subject matter lands;
4. The 2nd respondent who has now become the Legal Representative of the deceased sole appellant herein shall have no objection whatsoever for the 1st respondent withdrawing the amounts deposited by him and lying to the credit of the suit together with interest accrued thereon from the bank where it is kept in deposit without any further notice to the parties hereto;
5. The parties hereto agree and admit that they shall bear respective costs in the litigation.
3. Having regard to the above compromise and by placing the
memorandum of terms of compromise referred to supra on record, the
application in I.A.No.1 of 2022 is allowed, and the second appeal is BSS,J S.A.No.165 of 2007
disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand
closed.
______________________ BANDARU SYAMSUNDER, J Dt:17.11.2022.
Rns BSS,J S.A.No.165 of 2007
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE BANDARU SYAMSUNDER
I.A.No.1 of 2022 in/and S.A.No.165 of 2007
Date: 17.11.2022
Rns
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!