Thursday, 30, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The vs /Ws & Vv/Wv Department
2022 Latest Caselaw 2380 AP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2380 AP
Judgement Date : 5 May, 2022

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
The vs /Ws & Vv/Wv Department on 5 May, 2022
    THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO

               WRIT PETITION No.965 of 2021
ORDER:

The petitioner is a resident of Venkupalli Village in

Kadapa District. The Government had initially sanctioned a

Village Secretariat to the Gram Panchayat, Venkupalli in

accordance with G.O.Ms.No.110 dated 19.07.2019. Originally

the location of the building was to be in Venkupalli Village.

However, the location of the building was shifted from

Venkupalli Village to Zillella village which is part of the same

Gram Panchayat and a foundation stone has also been laid for

construction of the building. The petitioner states that the

petitioner and other villagers had made a number of

representations to the authorities, to stop the construction of

the building in Zillella Village, and to take up construction of

the building in Venkupalli village. The petitioner contends that

the reasons given by the authorities, that there is no

government land, available in Venkupalli Village, is only an

excuse to shift the building to Zillella Village.

2. The 6th respondent and the 7th respondents have

filed separate counters. In the counter filed by the 6th

respondent, it is stated that the Village Secretariat had

initially been proposed to be constructed in Venkupalli Village

as part of the 'Navaratnalu scheme' in accordance with

G.O.Ms.No.110 dated 19.07.2019. However, the Assistant

Engineer (RWS & S) Duvvur Mandal, on inspection of the site,

RRR,J W.P.No.965 of 2021

had informed that the site allotted in Venkupalli Village was

not suitable for construction of the Secretariat building as the

said site cannot accommodate the building with proper

dimensions. The Assistant Engineer had also requested for

allotment of an alternative suitable site at Venkupalli Village

itself. Thereafter, the Tahsidlar, Duvvur Mandal has stated

that there was no alternative land available at Venkupalli

Village. At that stage, one Sri S.Sai Pratap of Zillella Village

came forward to donate half an acre in Sy.No.116/2A in

Zillella Village, free of cost, for construction of a Village

Secretariat, Rythu Bharosa kendram and Y.S.R Clinic. The

villagers of Zillella Village had also given a representation to

the District Collector to establish these buildings in Zillella

Village as it would be convenient for all the habitations which

form the Venkupalli Gram Panchayat. The 6th respondent goes

on to state that on examination of these requests of the

villagers of Zillella, it was found that the location of these

buildings in Zillella would ensure that it would be more

centrally located.

3. In view of these factors, proposals were placed

before the Commissioner, VS/WS & VV/WV Department,

Thadepalli, Guntur District, by a letter of the 3rd respondent

bearing Rc.No.N8/1059/2020, dated 18.01.2021. The matter

was then sent up to the Special Chief Secretary to the

Government, Department of GV/WV & VS/WS, who had

accorded permission to the Commissioner & Director vide

RRR,J W.P.No.965 of 2021

Memo No.1396928/GWS01/169/2021, dated 26.04.2021 to

change the location of the Village Secretariat from Venkupalli

Gram Panchayat to Zillella Gram Panchayat. On the basis of

these proceedings, the location of the building was shifted

from Venkupalli to Zillella.

4. The 6th respondent also relied upon a judgment of

the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.Nos.55 and 99 of 2021

dated 27.08.2021. In this case, the Division Bench had

considered a case of relocation of the Village Secretariat from

the original location to another location. The Division Bench,

after considering G.O.Ms.No.110, dated 19.07.2019 had held

that the location of a Village Secretariat is essentially an

administrative matter and a decision in this regard has to be

taken by the executive. In view of the specific reasons given for

the change of the location, it cannot be said that the decision

to change the location of the Village Secretariat is so irrational

that this Court is required to intervene the exercise of the

discretion.

5. The petitioner in his reply affidavit had disputed

the distances pointed out by the 6th and 7th respondent in

their counter affidavits. However, the fact remains that the

non availability of necessary land in Venkupalli Gram

Panchayat cannot be ignored. In the circumstances, the

petitioner cannot insist that the Gram Panchayat has to be

built only in Venkupalli Village irrespective of whether

RRR,J W.P.No.965 of 2021

necessary extent of land is available in Venkupalli Village or

not.

6. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. There

shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand

closed.

___________________________________ JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO Date : 05-05-2022 RJS

RRR,J W.P.No.965 of 2021

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO

WRIT PETITION No.965 of 2021

Date : 05.05.2022

RJS

RRR,J W.P.No.965 of 2021

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter