Sunday, 19, May, 2024
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The vs Unknown
2022 Latest Caselaw 2214 AP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2214 AP
Judgement Date : 2 May, 2022

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
The vs Unknown on 2 May, 2022
              HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO

                          W.P.No.12853 of 2022

ORDER:

The petitioner, who is in the business of establishing infrastructure

for Cellular mobile telephone operators in India, after obtaining necessary

permissions from the 2nd respondent, commenced setting up of a Cellular

Mobile tower in Razole Village and Mandal, East Godavari District. While,

the said tower was being erected, the 2nd respondent issued a notice to

the petitioner on 16.03.2002 directing the petitioner to stop erection on

the ground based tower in view of the objections raised by the people in

the locality. Aggrieved by the said notice, the petitioner has approached

this Court.

Sri Ghanta Sridhar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

would rely upon the earlier judgments of this Court dated 09.04.2019 in

W.P.Nos.3137 and 13896 of 2017 and the orders dated 21.10.2019 in

W.P.(PIL).No.92 of 2019 and the order dated 26.12.2019 in W.P.No.9519

of 2019. In all these cases, the writ petitions had been filed to direct the

Gram Panchayats to stop giving any permissions on the ground that the

radiation come from these towers would affect the health of the residents

of the respective villages.

In the present case, the Gram Panchayat, after having given

permission, has now taken the step of prohibiting the petitioner from

completing the erection of the tower. The power of the Gram Panchayat

to reverse its earlier decision and the authority of the Gram Panchayat to

direct stoppage of construction activity after having given permission, is a

matter of dispute.

                                        2                               RRR,J
                                                        W.P.No.12853 of 2022




In the circumstances, it would be appropriate to direct the Gram

Panchayat to consider any objections that the petitioner may file in

relation to the stoppage of erection of tower. However, since the objection

appears to be the perceived apprehension of the villagers about the

radiation that may come from the tower, it would also be appropriate to

permit the petitioner to complete the construction, subject to the

condition that the tower would not become operational until this issue is

decided by the Gram Panchayat. Needless to say, the Gram Panchayat

shall take a decision either way within a period of three weeks from the

date of receipt of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand,

closed.

_________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.

2nd May, 2022 Js.

                          3                           RRR,J
                                      W.P.No.12853 of 2022




      HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO




               W.P.No.12853 of 2022




                   2nd May, 2022
Js.
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 
 
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2024

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2024', Apply Now!

 
 
 
 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

Publish Your Article

Campus Ambassador

Media Partner

Campus Buzz