Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1233 AP
Judgement Date : 9 March, 2022
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE No: W.P.No.5891 of 2022
PROCEEDING SHEET
SL. DATE ORDER OFFICE
NO. NOTE
01. 09.03.2022 KVL, J
Heard Ms. Nirupama, learned
counsel, representing Smt. Kavitha
Gottipati, learned counsel for the
petitioner.
The Writ Petition is filed challenging
the seizure of 310.00 Quintals of Raw Rice
from lorry bearing registration
No.AP27TZ1539 under the cover of police
proceedings dated 20.01.2022 as arbitrary
and illegal.
The main contention of the learned
counsel for the petitioner is that according
to Clause 20(a) of the Andhra Pradesh
Targeted Public Distribution System
(Control Order), 2018, the power to seize
the stock is given only to the officers not
below the rank of Sub-Inspector. Whereas,
in the present case, a Constable has seized
the subject stock.
Learned counsel also relied upon the
Judgment of this Court in Vigneswara
Traders Vs., The Circle Inspector of Police &
others [2013(4) ALD 241] in support of her
contention.
In view of the facts and
circumstances of the case, the respondents
are directed to release the subject stock to the petitioner, which was seized on SL. DATE ORDER OFFICE NO. NOTE 20.01.2022. However, this order is subject to the further order that would be passed in the enquiry initiated under Section 6A of the Essential Commodities Act and the petitioner is at liberty to raise all the contentions before the Joint Collector.
List the matter after eight (08) weeks.
________ KVL, J Ks
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!