Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Barre Vijaya Lakshmi vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
2022 Latest Caselaw 4062 AP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4062 AP
Judgement Date : 18 July, 2022

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Barre Vijaya Lakshmi vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 18 July, 2022
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

                WRIT PETITION No.6175 of 2022

ORDER:-

      This Writ Petition for mandamus is filed to declare the action

of respondents - police officials in not providing police aid to the

petitioner for effective implementation of the judgment and decree

passed by the civil Court, as illegal and consequently sought

direction to respondents 2 to 4 to provide police aid to the

petitioner against the unofficial respondents 5 to 10 as per the

representation submitted on 19.01.2021.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents

1 to 4 and learned counsel for the unofficial respondents 5 to 7

and 9. None appeared for respondents 8 and 10.

The petitioner is the plaintiff in the suit in O.S.No.54 of 2009

on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Palakol. She

has filed the said suit against the unofficial respondents 5 to 10 for

decree of permanent injunction restraining them and their men

from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the

petitioner in respect of the plaint schedule property of the said

suit. The said suit was decreed on 02.01.2019 granting permanent

injunction decree in favour of the petitioner in respect of the plaint

schedule property restraining the unofficial respondents herein

from interfering with her possession and enjoyment of the

property.

Now, the grievance of the writ petitioner is that despite

passing of the said permanent injunction decree, the unofficial

respondents 5 to 10 are still interfering with the possession and

enjoyment of the said property and as such she has submitted a

representation, dated 19.01.2021, with the respondents - police

officials seeking police aid and they are not providing the said

police aid.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on

instructions, would submit that as it is a civil dispute relating to a

decree passed by the civil Court that the police will normally not

interfere in the civil dispute unless the Court directs to provide

police aid. He would submit that if the trial Court or this Court

directs the police to provide police aid that they will provide the

same to the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the unofficial respondents would submit

that the petitioner is seeking to grant police aid to implement the

decree in respect of the land in an extent of 65 cents and the

decree was passed only for 6 cents out of the said 65 cents and as

such the petitioner is not entitled for police aid in respect of 65

cents.

As can be seen from the copy of the decree which is now

produced by the learned counsel for the unofficial respondents,

along with counter, the decree was passed only for 6 cents out of

65 cents. The said 6 cents of land is clearly shown in the

boundaries given in the said schedule. Therefore, the petitioner

cannot seek police aid in respect of entire 65 cents of land. She is

only entitled for police aid to implement the said permanent

injunction decree in respect of only 6 cents out of 65 cents, which

is the plaint schedule property in the said suit.

It is well settled law that when a permanent injunction

decree is passed, the Court can grant police aid for effective

implementation of the said injunction decree passed by the

competent civil Court.

Therefore, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to

the respondents 3 and 4 - police officials to provide police

protection/aid to the petitioner for effective implementation of the

permanent injunction decree, dated 02.01.2019, passed in

O.S.No.54 of 2009 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil

Judge, Palakol, only in respect of 6 cents which is clearly shown in

the plaint schedule of the said suit. No costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Writ Petition,

shall stand closed.

_____________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

Date: 18.07.2022 AKN

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

WRIT PETITION No. 6175 of 2022

Date: 18-07-2022

AKN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter