Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 350 AP
Judgement Date : 25 January, 2022
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI
MAIN CASE No.: S.A.No.379 of 2019
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. Office
DATE ORDER
No Note
4. 25.01.2022 MVR, J
I.A.No.1 of 2019
Transferred
to I/O
Heard Sri Uday Kumar, learned counsel for folder
before
Sri Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, learned counsel for correction
the appellant.
Respondent was served notice. None
represented. Service against respondent is sufficient.
Accepting the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition that make out sufficient cause to condone the delay of ten (10) days in filing this petition, this petition is allowed. No costs.
_____ MVR,J
S.A.No.379 of 2019
Heard learned counsel for the appellant. Considering the findings recorded in the judgments of the trial court as well as the appellate Court and submissions of learned counsel for the appellant, since the following substantial question of law arise for determination in this second appeal, ADMIT.
Whether the first appellate Court is right in reversing the judgment of the trial Court with
Contd..
reference to joint nucleus claimed by the plaintiff, in the absence of proof of necessary conditions ?
Notice to respondent.
List during 1st week of April, 2022.
______ MVR,J
I.A.No.2 of 2022 Heard.
The trial Court is directed to proceed with the final decree petition if any, pending and shall not pass final decree until further orders.
Notice to respondent.
______ MVR,J EPS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!