Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

V.Venkateswara Raoalias Chintu vs Sri Vyasasramam
2022 Latest Caselaw 9468 AP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9468 AP
Judgement Date : 8 December, 2022

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
V.Venkateswara Raoalias Chintu vs Sri Vyasasramam on 8 December, 2022
Bench: C.Praveen Kumar, B V Chakravarthi
  THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR
                     AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI

                  CONTEMPT APPEAL No.34 of 2022


JUDGMENT:- (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice C.Praveen Kumar)

       Heard Sri G. V. S. Kishore Kumar, learned counsel for

the appellant, and Sri G. Ramesh Babu, learned counsel

appearing for the respondent, and with their consent, this

Contempt Appeal is disposed of at the stage of admission.

2. The present Contempt Appeal is filed under Section 19 of

the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 challenging the order, dated

01.11.2022 in C.C.No.1466 of 2021 wherein a learned Single

Judge of this Court passed the following order:-

"19) In the considered opinion of this Court, once the respondent by filing a compromise Memo invited the decree dated 24.11.1997 and as such, he has to implement the same without any deviation. Avoiding to implement the decree is deliberate violation of the Order of the Court, which is punishable under the provisions of the Contempt of Court Act. As such, in our considered view, the respondent has committed Contempt of Court and therefore, he is liable for the punishment under the provisions of the Contempt of Court Act.

20) Accordingly, the Contempt Case is allowed and the contemnor is sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment for

a period of Two months and to pay a fine of Rs.2000/- (Rupees Two Thousand only). In default of the payment of the amount, the respondent shall undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of Two weeks.

(ii) The Contemnor is directed to surrender before the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court on or before 14-11-2022.

21) There shall be no order as to costs."

3. It appears that pending appeal, the parties have settled

their dispute out of Court. The respondent filed a memo before

this Court on 01.12.2022, duly enclosing the Undertaking

Affidavit given by the appellant dated 30.11.2022. Para No.4 of

the said Undertaking Affidavit reads as under:-

"4. I submit that, as the matter stood, pending contempt appeal, the parties to the above proceedings have reconciled the subject issue in 'lis' and pursuant to the reconciliation, I hereby undertake to vacate the schedule properties as per the following terms and conditions:-

a) That I shall forthwith handover the property situated behind the two theaters viz., Sri Venkateshwara Theater and Ananda Theater, roughly an extent of 10,000 sft. to the respondent.

b) That I shall handover Ananda Theater, in its as it is where it is form, by 28.02.2023, without fail to the respondent.

c) That the respondent in the contempt appeal, who is the absolute owner of the schedule properties, has accepted for my continuation of my possession and enjoyment as a lawful tenant in Sri Venkateshwara Theater and that I

shall continue the same till 31.12.2024 and respondent has no objection of any kind.

d) That I shall pay the monthly rent, an amount of Rs.65,000/- for Sri Venkateshwara Theater from 01.03.2023 till 31.12.2024 without fail to the respondent.

e) That I shall strictly adhere to all the above conditions with due diligence and I reiterate that I shall not deviate from the above conditions/understanding between me and respondent in the contempt appeal.

f) That it is made clear, in the event myself and respondents in the contempt appeal have any future thought, to continue as a lessee and lessor in the said premises, that we shall get executed a new agreement to the satisfaction of the both the parties, however it is mandatory that I shall vacate the premises by 31.12.2024 and handover the possession enjoyment of Sri Venkateshwara Theater to the respondents and after handing over the theater only, a new agreement for Sri Venkateswara Theater or for other properties that I am relinquishing by way of this undertaking shall be executed by the respondent, all at his will and pleasure.

g) The above terms and conditions as stipulated or executed by me in due diligence, without threat, fraud, coercion and same are binding on me for the above purpose only."

In view of the above, learned counsel for the appellant would

submit that the matter may be closed.

4. Taking into consideration the contents of the Undertaking

Affidavit filed and having regard to the terms and conditions

stipulated therein, which are agreed upon, this Contempt

Appeal stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Contempt

Appeal shall stand closed.

_______________________________ JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR

___________________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI Date : 08.12.2022 AMD

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI

CONTEMPT APPEAL No.34 of 2022

Date : 08.12.2022

AMD

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter