Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9358 AP
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2022
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURESH REDDY
W.P.No.31074 of 2022
ORDER:-
This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:-
"to issue a writ order or direction more
particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS
declaring the action of the Respondents in withholding
the payments of Rs.1,08,14,511/- to the petitioner for supplying the Sailage Bailes to the Respondent No 3 and 4 Animal Husbandry Department even after issuing sanction proceedings for 6 work supplies i) Proc Roc No ASLPSK08/SRE1105/2019 20/SIUJAN/0519, dated.22- 01-2020 ii) Proc Roc No ASLPSK08/SRE1105/201920/SI WAN/0511 dated.22-01-2020 iii) Proc Roc No.ASLPSK08/SRE1105/201920/SIL/JAN/0511, dated. 22-01-2020 iv) Proc Roc.No.ASLPSK08/SRE1105/2019 20/SIL/JAN/0511 dated.22-01-2020 v) Proc Roc No ASLPSK08/SRE1105/201920/SIL/JAN/0511 dated.
22-01-2020 and vi) Proc Roc No.
ASLPSK08/SRE1105/201920/SIL/JAN/0511 dated.
22-01-2020 and generating CFMS tokens 2022274934 and 2022282959 is illegal arbitrary discriminatory contrary and violation of principle of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents to pay the total bill amounts of Rs.1,08,14,511/- along with interest @24% to the petitioner."
2. The contention of the petitioner is that he was awarded
the contract work by the 3rd respondent i.e., supply of Sailage
Bales (Corn extract Silage Bales are made by chopping the
maize crop (with cob) into small pieces) and in that process
an amount of Rs.1,08,14,511/- has to be paid by the
respondents. Further, it is the contention of the petitioner that
even though the respondents admitted that the petitioner is
entitled for payment of the aforesaid amount, no payment is
being made. The petitioner contends that such non-payment
of money is clearly arbitrary and high-handed requiring the
interference of this court.
3. This court, in various orders, including the judgment of
a learned single Judge of this court, dated 05-10-2021 in
W.P.No.10038 of 2021 and batch had taken the view that
such non-payment of dues is arbitrary and that such dues
need to be cleared by the respondents at the earliest.
4. The learned Government Pleaders for Animal Husbandry
and Finance and Planning have not disputed the same and
submit that payment/bills will be considered in due course as
and when funds made available.
5. In view of the aforesaid directions of this court in
various cases and after hearing both sides, this writ petition is
disposed of with a direction to the respondents to pay the
pending bill amount i.e., Rs.1,08,14,511/- to the petitioner
within a period of eight(8) weeks from the date of receipt of a
copy of this order . It would also be open to the petitioner to
agitate his/her/their claim for interest, if any payable by the
respondents in an appropriate forum.
No order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any,
pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
_______________ K.SURESH REDDY,J 06-12-2022.
TSNR
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!