Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Syed Bazed vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh,
2022 Latest Caselaw 2093 AP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2093 AP
Judgement Date : 28 April, 2022

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Syed Bazed vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 28 April, 2022
                                                                                      RC,J
                                                                      W.P.No.27988 of 2021

                                            1


                HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

                      WRIT PETITION No. 27988 of 2021

ORDER:

This writ petition has been filed under article 226 of the Constitution of

India for the following relief:

"....to issue an appropriate order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the Memo No.OE56362021-3, dated 16.11.2021 issued by the 2nd respondent, rejecting the representation to consider the case of the petitioner for sanction of increments as not feasible, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of articles 14, 16& 21 of the Constitution of India and also the Judgments of this Court and consequently set aside the Memo No.OE5636/2021-3, dated 16.11.2021 issued by the 2nd respondent and direct the 2nd respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for releasing increments for the period on 01.;01.2019, 01.01.2020 and 01.01.2021 in terms of the judgment of this Court in W.P.No.4553 of 2021 and W.P.No.9228 of 2021 and release the increments...."

2. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that while he was working as

Superintendent/Sub Registrar, Gr.II in the office of the 2nd respondent, there

was ACB trap on 18.09.2018 and the petitioner was kept under suspension

w.e.f. 19.09.2018 and investigation is pending, his suspension was revoked

during review meeting held on 28.10.2019 without prejudice to the

disciplinary/ criminal proceedings initiated against him and accordingly he was

reinstated into service. It is the further case of the petitioner that he made a

representation to the 2nd respondent on 03.09.2021 for release of increments

which are due on 01.01.2019, 01.01.2020 and 01.01.2021 and the said

representation was rejected by the 2nd respondent placing reliance on rule-

5(a)& F.R.24 of A.P.Fundamental Rules. Aggrieved by the same, the present

writ petition is filed.

RC,J W.P.No.27988 of 2021

3. The 2nd respondent filed counter-affidavit refuting the averments of

the petition.

4. Heard Sri E.V.V.S.Ravi Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and

Sri N.Aswartha Narayana, learned Government Pleader for Services-I.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that rejection of

representation of the petitioner placing reliance on Rule-5(a) & F.R.24 of A.P.

Fundamental Rules is not sustainable and Rule-5(a) is not at all applicable to

the facts of the case. The learned counsel while relying on the orders of this

Court passed in W.P.No.4553 of 2021 and W.P.No.9228 of 2021, which were

placed on record, contended that the respondents have no right to withhold

the annual increments and prayed to allow the writ petition.

6. On the other hand, the learned Government Pleader for Service-I

argued that annual increment for the year 2021 has already been granted to

the petitioner and as the petitioner is not entitled for annual increments for

the years 2019 and 2020 they were withheld and thus justified the action of

the respondents in withholding them and prayed to dismiss the writ petition.

7. A perusal of the memo passed by the 2nd respondent shows that it is

not as per law and the reasons mentioned therein are not justifiable.

8. Upon perusal of the orders passed in W.P.No.4553 of 2021 and

W.P.No.9228 of 2021, relied on by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this

Court deems it fit and appropriate to dispose of the writ petition on the

following terms:

RC,J W.P.No.27988 of 2021

(a) The impugned Memo No.OE56362021-3, dated 16.11.2021 issued

by the 2nd respondent is set aside,

(b) The 2nd respondent is directed to consider and decide the issue

afresh with regard to release of annual increments for the years

2019 and 2020, preferably within a period of four (04) weeks from

the date of receipt of copy of this order, bearing in mind the

orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.9228 of 2021 and

W.P.No.4553 of 2021 and also the Rules in vogue.

(c) There shall be no order as to costs.

As sequel thereto, miscellaneous petition, if any, pending shall stand

closed. Interim orders, if any, shall stand vacated.

_________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 28th April, 2022 RR RC,J W.P.No.27988 of 2021

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION No.27988 of 2021

28th April, 2022

RR

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter