Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2812 AP
Judgement Date : 3 August, 2021
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION NO.15013 OF 2021
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
of India seeking the following relief:-
"to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of 3rd respondent in not deciding the petitioner's appeal dated 25.03.2015 filed under Standing Order 34-A of Andhra Pradesh Board of Revenue Standing Orders, as illegal, irregular, irrational and amounts to non discharge of legal obligation conferred on the 3rd respondent under the provisions of aforesaid standing order and offends Article 14 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to decide his pending appeal dated 25.03.2015 in accordance with law"
2. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the
respondents, during hearing, Sri V.N.V Surya Dattu, learned counsel
for the petitioner limited his request to dispose of appeal pending
before the 3rd respondent/Revenue Divisional Officer, without
touching the merits of the case.
3. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the
respondents readily agreed to dispose of the appeal, if any, pending
with the respondent-authorities.
4. Recording the submissions made by the learned Government
Pleader for Revenue, I need not decide the truth or otherwise of the
allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no
such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court
in The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh1, wherein the Apex
Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of
cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do no
2019 (8) SCALE 544
service to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the
petitioner himself requested to issue a direction to dispose of the
appeal pending before the 3rd respondent/Revenue Divisional Officer,
I find no other alternative, except to issue such direction.
5. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the
3rd respondent/Revenue Divisional Officer to dispose of the appeal
pending before him, in accordance with law, within Six(6) weeks from
the date of a receipt of copy of this order after giving opportunity to
all the concerned. No costs.
As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall
also stand closed.
__________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Date: 03.08.2021
tm
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION NO.15013 OF 2021
Date: 03.08.2021
tm
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!