Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Durvesh Babu And 8 Others vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others
2025 Latest Caselaw 190 ALL

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 190 ALL
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2025

Allahabad High Court

Durvesh Babu And 8 Others vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 1 April, 2025

Author: Ajit Kumar
Bench: Ajit Kumar




HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 


?Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:44357
 
Court No. - 4
 

 
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18462 of 2024
 

 
Petitioner :- Durvesh Babu And 8 Others
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Akshay Kumar Shukla,Ravindra Pal Singh Kashyap
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
 

 
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
 

1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents.

2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioners have questioned recovery of the commutation amount given to the petitioners, by means of installments from pension.

3. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioners that since amount paid as commutation has already stood recovered, further recovery from the pension of petitioner is bad even though rules provide for deductions for a period of 15 years.

4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the controversy is no more res integra in the light of judgment of Division Bench of this Court in the case of Ashok Kumar Agarwal and others v. Union of India and another passed in Writ - A No.- 17819 of 2024 decided on 15th January, 2025 which has also been followed by a coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Radheshyam Shukla and others v. State of U.P. and others along with bunch matters passed in Writ - A No.- 19031 of 2024 decided on 6th March, 2025.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the above facts, nor could take any plea that above judgments are distinguishable on law or on facts. Learned counsel for the petitioner also could not place any judgment of Supreme Court to hold that judgments relied upon by learned Standing Counsel are not binding judicial precedents.

6. In view of the above, no indulgence can be granted by this Court in such matter.

7. Thus petition is dismissed in the light of the law laid down in aforesaid quoted authorities of this Court.

Order Date :- 1.4.2025

Deepika

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter