Ramlal And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another
2024 Latest Caselaw 36274 ALL

Allahabad High Court

Ramlal And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 5 November, 2024

Author: Sanjay Kumar Pachori

Bench: Sanjay Kumar Pachori

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 


?Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:173059
 
Court No. - 77
 

 
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 35028 of 2024
 

 
Applicant :- Ramlal And Another
 
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Raunak Kanaujiya,Shubham Kumar
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
 

Sri Shubham Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State are present.

The present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed to quash the order dated 1.10.2019 13.9.2024 passed by A.C.J.M., Allahabad, Court No. 6, Prayagraj, in Case No. 4782 of 2005 (State vs. Ram Lal and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 221 of 1993, under Sections 323, 504, 325 of I.P.C., P.S. Mauaima, District Prayagraj, whereby non bailable warrant has been issued against the applicants.

Applicants were on bail before passing the impugned order dated 1.10.2019.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the impugned order has been passed by the court without satisfying itself that the summon and other process for attendance has been served and without issuing any summon or bailable warrant, direct N.B.W. has been issued.

Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that the impugned order has been passed without considering the facts and circumstances of the case and law provided in this regard. It is further submitted that order of the non-bailable warrant has been passed without satisfying the service of summons or bailable warrants itself and reason to believe from absconding the process of the court.

Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 have opposed the application.

Considering submissions of learned counsel and perusing record, the instant application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed of with a direction that in case applicant appears before the court below within three weeks from today and applies for bail/recall of non bailable warrant, his application shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgments rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another 2022 (11) SCC 676 and Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director 2021 SCC Online SC 941.

For a period of three weeks from today or till applicant appears before the court below, whichever is earlier, execution of non bailable warrant against the applicant shall be kept in abeyance.

Order Date :- 5.11.2024

A.P. Pandey