Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ram Janam vs State Of Up And 3 Others
2024 Latest Caselaw 20030 ALL

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 20030 ALL
Judgement Date : 30 May, 2024

Allahabad High Court

Ram Janam vs State Of Up And 3 Others on 30 May, 2024

Author: Saumitra Dayal Singh

Bench: Saumitra Dayal Singh





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 


?Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:99198-DB
 
Court No. - 39
 

 
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 929 of 2024
 

 
Petitioner :- Ram Janam
 
Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Hanuman Prasad Kushwaha
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
 

 
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
 

Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

2. Grievance of the petitioner is, though he was original registered owner of the vehicle (Jeep Taxi) bearing Registration No. U.P.-64-T-2037, that vehicle had been financed from Tata Motor Finance Solution Ltd. Owing to default committed by the petitioner in repayment of its loan, the said finance company repossessed the vehicle in 2014.

3. In such facts, it is the contention of the petitioner, he is not liable for road tax dues of the said vehicle since its repossession.

4. Whatever be the facts this much is clear, in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. State of U.P. & Ors. (2022) 5 SCC 525, the petitioner who is the original owner, may not be liable for road tax dues on the vehicle in question from the date of its repossession by the finance authority.

5. At present, the tax liability appears to be Rs. 2,34,102/- for the period 01.06.2015 to 31.05.2023 yet, the original authority has not been approached in accordance with law and thus, that authority has yet not applied its mind.

6. In view of facts noted above, no useful purpose may be served by keeping the present writ petition pending or calling for counter affidavit. This petition is disposed of with a direction, in case the petitioner files a fresh application on the prescribed proforma before respondent no.2 referable to Rule 18 of the U.P. Motor Vehicles Taxation Rules, 1998, within a period of two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order, that application shall be dealt with strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within three months therefrom.

7. Subject to first compliance made, for a period of three months or till the disposal of the application to be made by the petitioner, whichever is earlier, no coercive measure may be adopted against the petitioner.

Order Date :- 30.5.2024

Noman

(Donadi Ramesh, J.) (S.D. Singh, J.)

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter