Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Managing Director Pradeshik ... vs Ashish Kumar Srivastava And ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 28593 ALL

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 28593 ALL
Judgement Date : 13 October, 2023

Allahabad High Court
Managing Director Pradeshik ... vs Ashish Kumar Srivastava And ... on 13 October, 2023
Bench: Attau Rahman Masoodi, Om Prakash Shukla




HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
 
 


?Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:66950-DB
 
Court No. - 1
 

 
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 786 of 2023
 
Appellant :- Managing Director Pradeshik Cooperative Dairy Federation Ltd. Lucknow
 
Respondent :- Ashish Kumar Srivastava And Another
 
Counsel for Appellant :- Lalit Shukla
 
Counsel for Respondent :- Aman Shankar
 

 
Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J.

Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.

(C.M. Application No.1 of 2023: Application for Condonation of Delay)

1. Heard Shri Lalit Shukla, learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent No.1.

2. There is delay of 12 days in filing the special appeal. The appeal is accompanied with an application for condonation of delay supported by an affidavit.

3. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 does not have any objection, if delay in filing the instant appeal is condoned and the matter is heard on merits.

4. Cause shown in the affidavit filed in support of application for condonation of delay is satisfactory and in absence of any objection, application for condonation of delay is allowed and delay in filing the special appeal is hereby condoned.

(order on appeal)

5. The intra-Court appeal filed under Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 has assailed the judgment/order dated 22.08.2023 passed by the writ Court in Writ-A No.6137 of 2023.

6. The challenge to the impugned judgment/order dated 22.08.20223 is confined to the payment of interest on the amount due which was computed as a consequence of grant of promotional pay scale on completion of 19 and 24 years of satisfactory service. The amount due has already been paid to the respondent No.1-employee.

7. It is to be noted that the respondent No.1-employee had opted for voluntary retirement under the scheme in the year 2016 but the benefit of promotional pay scale on account of an audit objection remained pending with the appellant-organization.

8. By an order passed on 23.12.2022, the benefit of promotional pay scale on completion of 19 and 24 years of satisfactory service was however granted in favour of the respondent and the actual payment has also been made after passing of the impugned judgement/order in Writ-A No.6137 of 2023 on 22.08.2023. The interest component has not been paid till date. It is this part of the payment, pursuant to the order passed by the writ Court which has come to be challenged in the present special appeal.

9. Once the principle amount has been paid to the respondent pursuant to the same very judgment, there is no reason as to why delayed payment may not be compensated at the rate of 7% per annum ordered by the writ Court.

10. We see no good reason to interfere in the present special appeal, the same is hereby dismissed.

(Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Attau Rahman Masoodi, J.)

Order Date :- 13.10.2023

Shubhankar

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter