Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9037 ALL
Judgement Date : 27 March, 2023
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 353 of 2023 Petitioner :- M/S Star Enterlocking Bricks Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yashonidhi Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
Present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 07.05.2022 whereby the registration of the petitioner has been cancelled.
The petitioner also challenges the order dated 20.01.2023 whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner has been rejected on the ground of delay.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the impugned order is a non-speaking order. He relies upon a judgment passed by this Court in the case of M/s Chandra Sain, Sarda Nagar, Lucknow Thru. Its Proprietor v. U.O.I & Ors. (Writ Tax No.147 of 2022) on 22.09.2022.
I have perused the impugned order, which is patently non-speaking order.
Considering the fact that a similar issue has been decided by this Court in the case of M/s Chandra Sain (supra), the present writ petition deserves to be allowed on the same ground and reasoning.
The writ petition is accordingly allowed.
Impugned orders dated 07.05.2022 and 20.01.2023 are set aside.
The matter is remanded to the adjudicating authority to pass fresh order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
Order Date :- 27.3.2023
nishant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!