Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 17343 ALL
Judgement Date : 14 July, 2023
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:140614 Court No. - 92 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 24599 of 2016 Applicant :- Ibrahim And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Krishna Dutt Awasthi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Girja Shanker Sen Hon'ble Surendra Singh-I,J.
Sri Krishna Dutt Awasthi, learned counsel for the applicants has filed supplementary affidavit, annexing certified copy of agreement of settlement/compromise, affidavit in support of compromise and order dated 17.5.2023 passed by the trial court after verification of the agreement of settlement/compromise, which is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Grija Shankar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2, Sri K.K. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 253 of 2014 (Laxmi Devi vs. Ibrahim and another), under sections 352 and 504 I.P.C., P.S. Auraiya, district-Auraiya, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Auraiya, as well as summoning order dated 18.4.2016 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Auraiya.
In compliance of the order of this Court dated 11.5.2023, applicants and opposite party no. 2 have appeared before the concerned trial court and filed an application for verification of the agreement of settlement/compromise along with compromise deed, which was verified by the trial court on 17.5.2023.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court.
Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 states that the matter has been compromised and the opposite party no. 2 does not want to pursue the matter any further as the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and opposite party no. 2 has no objection if the present application in question is allowed and the impugned proceedings be quashed.
Since the parties have amicably settled the dispute and have mutually compromised in the matter. According to the counsels there is no dispute left out any more in between the parties and they wish no more litigation in between them. The compromise deed filed by them has been verified by the concerned trial Court.
In view of the fact that the applicants and opposite party no. 2 do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them. The matter has been mutually settled between the parties, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further.
Thus, in view of the well settled principles of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2003(4) SCC 675 (B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana) as well as the Judgment of the Apex Court reported in J.T., 2008(9) SC 192 (Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of investigation and another), the proceedings of the Complaint Case No. 253 of 2014 (Laxmi Devi vs. Ibrahim and another), under sections 352 and 504 I.P.C., P.S. Auraiya, district-Auraiya, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Auraiya, as well as summoning order dated 18.4.2016 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Auraiya are hereby quashed.
The present writ petition is accordingly allowed.
Order Date :- 14.7.2023
Faridul
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!