Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 13038 ALL
Judgement Date : 14 September, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 84 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2882 of 2018 Revisionist :- Ramratan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Rajeev Chaddha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sanjeev Kumar Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
1. None appeared to press this revision even in revised call. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. This criminal revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. has been filed aggrieved by order and judgment dated 2.7.2018 passed by Additional District Judge/ Family Court/F.T.C. IInd Gorakhpur in Case No.709 of 2007, Smt Saroj Devi and another Vs. Shri. Ramratan granting maintenance of Rs.4000/- per month to opposite party no.2 and Rs.2,000/- per month to opposite party no.2 from the date of order under Section 125 Cr.P.C.
3. Having gone through the record, I do not find any manifest error or otherwise illegality, procedural or otherwise, so as to justify interference in criminal revision.
4. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
5. Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.
Order Date :- 14.9.2022
SB
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!