Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mahraj Singh And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another
2022 Latest Caselaw 14736 ALL

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14736 ALL
Judgement Date : 20 October, 2022

Allahabad High Court
Mahraj Singh And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 20 October, 2022
Bench: Krishan Pahal



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 78
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9890 of 2022
 

 
Applicant :- Mahraj Singh And Another
 
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Yadav
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri P.K. Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record.

The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants in Case Crime No.C-04 of 2009, registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC at Police Station- Kotwali, District Mainpuri with a prayer to enlarge them on anticipatory bail.

As per prosecution story, the applicant no.1 is stated to have filed a forged medical certificate of disability of his son who was wanted in a case under Section 376 IPC and got him bailed out.

Learned counsel for the applicants has stated that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicants have not prepared any forged documents whatsoever. Learned counsel has further stated that the said documents were issued by the office of the Chief Medical Officer, Mainpuri and none of the said officials have been made accused in the FIR. The charge-sheet has been filed against the applicants. Several other submissions have been made on behalf of the applicants to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made an against them. The circumstances which, as per counsel, led to the false implication of the applicants have also been touched upon at length. Learned counsel for the applicants undertakes that they has co-operated in the investigation and are ready to do so in trial also failing which the State can move appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail.

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail application but unable to dispute the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicants.

On due consideration to the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. and considering the nature of accusations and antecedents of the applicants, the applicants are liable to be enlarged on anticipatory bail in view of the judgment of Supreme Court in the case of "Sushila Aggarwal Vs. State (NCT of Delhi), (2020) 5 SCC 1". The future contingencies regarding the anticipatory bail being granted to applicants shall also be taken care of as per the aforesaid judgment of the Apex Court.

In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicants is allowed. Let the accused-applicants- Mahraj Singh and Ajendra Singh be released forthwith in the aforesaid case crime (supra) on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the Police Station concerned/court concerned with the following conditions:-

1. that the applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

2. that the applicants shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;

3. that the applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court;

4. that the applicants shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness;

5. that the applicants shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed unless personal presence is exempted;

6. that in case of breach of any of the above conditions the court below shall have the liberty to cancel the bail.

It is made clear that observations made hereinabove are exclusively for deciding the instant anticipatory bail application and shall not affect the trial or deciding the regular bail application.

Order Date :- 20.10.2022

Ravi Kant

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter