Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3196 ALL
Judgement Date : 17 May, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 93 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 812 of 2016 Revisionist :- Smt. Rachchu Devi And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Santosh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Amit Kumar Singh,Bhanu Dutt Pandey Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
List has been revised.
None has appeared on behalf of the revisionist.
Sri Sanjay Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
This revision has been filed against the order dated 28.1.2016 by which Principal Judge Family Court Chitrakoot had directed opposite party no.2 to pay the maintenance of Rs. 1500/- per month to revisionist no.1 and Rs. 1000/- to revisionist no.2.
Learned A.G.A. submits that there appears no illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment and order passed by the court below, therefore, the present revision may be dismissed.
After having gone through the judgment and order passed by the court below and also perusal of the record and the arguments advanced by learned A.G.A., this Court comes to the conclusion that the same need no interference as there is no illegality or infirmity in the judgment and order under challenge, therefore, the present revision is liable to be dismissed.
Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned District and Sessions Judge for its onwards transmission to the concerned Magistrate for compliance who will proceed further in the matter.
The file is consigned to record.
Let the lower Court record, if any, be returned back to the concerned Court.
Order Date :- 17.5.2022
Arvind
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!