Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2301 ALL
Judgement Date : 7 May, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 12 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 135 of 2008 Revisionist :- Paras Nath Opposite Party :- Prem Narayan Shukla And 2 Ors. Counsel for Revisionist :- Rakesh Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- Umesh Kumar Shukla Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
1. List has been revised. No one appears either for the revisionists or for the respondents.
2. This criminal revision, under Section 397/401 CrPC has been filed against the judgment and order dated 04.10.2007 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Balrampur in Sessions Trial No. 64 of 2007.
3. By means of the judgment and order in question, the learned trial Court, after considering the evidence on record and taking into consideration the submissions made on behalf of the prosecution and the defence, did not find any offence having been committed by the accused-respondents and, therefore, acquitted them of the charges levelled under sections 325 and 323 IPC by giving benefit of doubt.
4. After perusing the judgment and order carefully, this Court does not find any error of law, fact or evidence, which requires any interference by this Court in exercise of revisional jurisdiction. Thus, the revision fails and is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 7.5.2022
MVS/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!