Vipin And Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 9444 ALL

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
 
 

?Court No. - 14
 

 
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5162 of 2022
 

 
Applicant :- Vipin And Others
 
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. And Another
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Kumar Shukla
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.

Sri Dinesh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Shiv Kumar Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

The present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1298 of 2022 , (State Vs. Vipin and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 0158 of 2020, under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 506, 452, 308 and 325 of I.P.C., Police Station- Takait Nagar, District- Barabanki, pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barabanki.

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that Vipin, Lav Singh @ Digvijay Singh, Munnu @ Manish Singh, Kutul @ Amrej Bahadur, Vipin Singh, Pawan, Sher Babu, Chandan, Pankaj and Suraj applicants have not been arrested during the course of investigation and charge-sheet has been submitted against them.

After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants wants to withdraw the application with liberty to file a regular bail application before the court of competent jurisdiction.

In case bail application is filed by the learned counsel for the applicants, the same shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgments rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another 2022 (11) SCC 676 and Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director 2021 SCC Online SC 941.

The application stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

Order Date :- 5.8.2022

Ishan