Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10037 ALL
Judgement Date : 11 August, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 266 of 2017 Revisionist :- Arun Mishra @ Sunil Mishra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Ors. Counsel for Revisionist :- Suyesh Pradhan Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Hari Prasad,Vineet Kumar Chaurasia Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent.
2. Present revision under section 19(4) of the Family Court Act, 1984 has been filed against the Judgment and Order dated 04-02-2017 passed by the learned Principal Judge,Family Court,Sitapur in Case No. 561 of 2013, by which application filed by the wife of the revisionist under section 125 Cr.P.C. for granting maintenance has been allowed.
3. By the impugned order 04-02-2017, learned Principal Judge,Family Court, Sitapur, after considering the evidence on record has awarded interim maintenance @ Rs. 2,000/- P.M. to the wife and @ Rs. 1,500/-P.M. each to the minor children of the revisionist.
4. This court does not find any error of law or jurisdiction in the impugned order passed by the learned Principal Judge,Family Court, Sitapur, in awarding meager amount of maintenance @ Rs. 2,000/- P.M. to the wife and @ Rs. 1,500/-P.M. each to the minor children of the revisionist.
5. This revision is without merit, which is hereby dismissed.
Order Date :- 11.8.2022
AKS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!