Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manisha Patel vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others
2021 Latest Caselaw 561 ALL

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 561 ALL
Judgement Date : 8 January, 2021

Allahabad High Court
Manisha Patel vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 8 January, 2021
Bench: Yashwant Varma



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 34
 

 
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 13625 of 2020
 

 
Petitioner :- Manisha Patel
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Seemant Singh
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arun Kumar
 

 
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.

Heard learned counsel for parties.

This petition would merit disposal in light of the judgment rendered by the Court in Pawan Kumar And 26 Others v. State of U.P. And 2 Others [Writ-A No. 11079 of 2020 decided on 14.12.2020]. In that petition the Court held thus:-

"On an overall conspectus of the aforesaid discussion the Court comes to the following conclusions. A permission to rectify and amend entries made in the online applications would be clearly impermissible in light of the caveats carried in the advertisements and notices issued by the respondents as well as the declarations made by the candidates themselves while participating in the recruitment process. It would not only be iniquitous but also detrimental to public interest to command the respondents to permit rectifications at the fag end of a recruitment exercise which commenced in December 2018. The stipulations contained in the advertisements and notices issued were never assailed by the petitioners prior to participating in the recruitment process. It would be unfair not just to the respondents but to the other selected candidates to now accord them such permission which would necessarily result in the selection process being stalled and derailed. This Court as well as the Supreme Court has consistently taken the view that such a course being tread would be wholly unfair and unwarranted. The Court repels the challenge to the Government Order of 4 December 2020 being contrary to the mandate of Rule 14. It also negatives its challenge on the ground of being discriminatory or unfair.

These petitions shall consequently stand disposed of with liberty to the State respondents to evaluate the case of each of the petitioners before this Court in light of the Government Order dated 4 December 2020. "

Accordingly this petition shall stand disposed of in similar terms.

Order Date :- 8.1.2021

Vivek Kr.

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter