Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 552 ALL
Judgement Date : 8 January, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 89 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 177 of 2021 Applicant :- Pappu Yadav @ Vishesh Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Pandey,Ashok Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Rakesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.
This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by applicant - Pappu Yadav @ Vishesh Yadav in connection with Case Crime No.0219 of 2020, under Sections 336, 285, 286 I.P.C. and 3/7 Essential Commodities Act, 1955, Police Station- Saifai, District Etawah.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of material brought on record as well as complicity of accused and also judgment of the Apex Court in the case of P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019 SC 4198, this Court does not find any exceptional ground to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the present application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
Order Date :- 8.1.2021
Anil K. Sharma
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!