Kiran Lata Singh vs State Of U.P. Through ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 3034 ALL

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

A.F.R.
 
Reserved on 28.01.2021
 
Delivered on 26.02.2021
 
Court No. - 48
 

 
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 326 of 2020
 

 
Appellant :- Kiran Lata Singh
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Secretary,Department Of Basic Education And 5 Others
 
Counsel for Appellant :- Siddharth Khare,Ashok Khare (Sr. Advocate),Rajendra Singh Yadav,Satya Prakash Maurya
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Avneesh Tripathi,Gagan Mehta,Jagannath Maurya,Nisheeth Yadav
 
with
 
Special Appeal Nos. 167 of 2020, 315 of 2020, 316 of 2020, 317 of 2020, 318 of 2020, 319 of 2020, 320 of 2020, 321 of 2020, 322 of 2020, 323 of 2020, 324 of 2020, 325 of 2020, 327 of 2020, 328 of 2020, 329 of 2020, 330 of 2020, 331 of 2020, 332 of 2020, 333 of 2020, 334 of 2020, 335 of 2020, 336 of 2020, 337 of 2020, 338 of 2020, 339 of 2020, 340 of 2020, 341 of 2020, 342 of 2020, 343 of 2020, 344 of 2020, 345 of 2020, 346 of 2020, 347 of 2020, 355 of 2020, 356 of 2020, 357 of 2020, 358 of 2020, 359 of 2020, 360 of 2020, 361 of 2020, 362 of 2020, 363 of 2020, 364 of 2020, 365 of 2020, 366 of 2020, 367 of 2020, 368 of 2020, 369 of 2020, 370 of 2020, 379 of 2020, 380 of 2020, 381 of 2020, 382 of 2020, 383 of 2020, 384 of 2020, 388 of 2020, 389 of 2020, 390 of 2020, 391 of 2020, 392 of 2020, 393 of 2020, 394 of 2020, 395 of 2020, 396 of 2020, 397 of 2020, 398 of 2020, 399 of 2020, 400 of 2020, 401 of 2020, 402 of 2020, 403 of 2020, 404 of 2020, 405 of 2020, 409 of 2020, 410 of 2020, 411 of 2020, 412 of 2020, 413 of 2020, 414 of 2020, 415 of 2020, 416 of 2020, 417 of 2020, 418 of 2020, 423 of 2020, 424 of 2020, 425 of 2020, 426 of 2020, 427 of 2020, 428 of 2020, 429 of 2020, 430 of 2020, 431 of 2020, 433 of 2020, 434 of 2020, 435 of 2020, 436 of 2020, 437 of 2020, 438 of 2020, 441 of 2020, 442 of 2020, 443 of 2020, 447 of 2020, 448 of 2020, 449 of 2020, 450 of 2020, 451 of 2020, 452 of 2020, 453 of 2020, 454 of 2020, 455 of 2020, 456 of 2020, 457 of 2020, 458 of 2020, 459 of 2020, 460 of 2020, 461 of 2020, 462 of 2020, 466 of 2020, 467 of 2020, 468 of 2020, 469 of 2020, 470 of 2020, 471 of 2020, 472 of 2020, 473 of 2020, 474 of 2020, 477 of 2020, 478 of 2020, 479 of 2020, 480 of 2020, 482 of 2020, 483 of 2020, 484 of 2020, 485 of 2020, 487 of 2020, 488 of 2020, 489 of 2020, 490 of 2020, 491 of 2020, 496 of 2020, 497 of 2020, 498 of 2020, 499 of 2020, 500 of 2020, 501 of 2020, 502 of 2020, 503 of 2020, 504 of 2020, 505 of 2020, 506 of 2020, 507 of 2020, 508 of 2020, 509 of 2020, 510 of 2020, 511 of 2020, 512 of 2020, 513 of 2020, 514 of 2020, 515 of 2020, 518 of 2020, 519 of 2020, 520 of 2020, 521 of 2020, 522 of 2020, 523 of 2020, 524 of 2020, 525 of 2020, 526 of 2020, 527 of 2020, 528 of 2020, 529 of 2020, 530 of 2020, 531 of 2020, 532 of 2020, 533 of 2020, 534 of 2020, 535 of 2020, 536 of 2020, 537 of 2020, 538 of 2020, 539 of 2020, 540 of 2020, 541 of 2020, 542 of 2020, 543 of 2020, 544 of 2020, 545 of 2020, 546 of 2020, 547 of 2020, 548 of 2020, 549 of 2020, 550 of 2020, 551 of 2020, 552 of 2020, 556 of 2020, 558 of 2020, 559 of 2020, 560 of 2020, 561 of 2020, 562 of 2020, 563 of 2020, 564 of 2020, 565 of 2020, 566 of 2020, 567 of 2020, 568 of 2020, 569 of 2020, 570 of 2020, 571 of 2020, 572 of 2020, 573 of 2020, 574 of 2020, 575 of 2020, 576 of 2020, 577 of 2020, 578 of 2020, 579 of 2020, 580 of 2020, 581 of 2020, 582 of 2020, 583 of 2020, 584 of 2020, 585 of 2020, 586 of 2020, 587 of 2020, 588 of 2020, 589 of 2020, 590 of 2020, 591 of 2020, 592 of 2020, 593 of 2020, 594 of 2020, 595 of 2020, 596 of 2020, 597 of 2020, 598 of 2020, 599 of 2020, 600 of 2020, 601 of 2020, 602 of 2020, 603 of 2020, 604 of 2020, 605 of 2020, 606 of 2020, 607 of 2020, 608 of 2020, 609 of 2020, 610 of 2020, 611 of 2020, 612 of 2020, 613 of 2020, 614 of 2020, 615 of 2020, 616 of 2020, 617 of 2020, 618 of 2020, 619 of 2020, 620 of 2020, 621 of 2020, 622 of 2020, 623 of 2020, 624 of 2020, 625 of 2020, 626 of 2020, 627 of 2020, 628 of 2020, 629 of 2020, 630 of 2020, 631 of 2020, 632 of 2020, 633 of 2020, 634 of 2020, 635 of 2020, 636 of 2020, 637 of 2020, 638 of 2020, 639 of 2020, 640 of 2020, 641 of 2020, 642 of 2020, 643 of 2020, 644 of 2020, 645 of 2020, 646 of 2020, 647 of 2020, 648 of 2020, 649 of 2020, 650 of 2020, 651 of 2020, 652 of 2020, 653 of 2020, 654 of 2020, 655 of 2020, 656 of 2020, 657 of 2020, 658 of 2020, 659 of 2020, 660 of 2020, 661 of 2020, 662 of 2020, 663 of 2020, 664 of 2020, 665 of 2020, 666 of 2020, 667 of 2020, 668 of 2020, 669 of 2020, 670 of 2020, 671 of 2020, 672 of 2020, 673 of 2020, 674 of 2020, 675 of 2020, 676 of 2020, 677 of 2020, 678 of 2020, 679 of 2020, 680 of 2020, 681 of 2020, 682 of 2020, 683 of 2020, 684 of 2020, 685 of 2020, 719 of 2020, 730 of 2020, 736 of 2020, 737 of 2020, 738 of 2020, 739 of 2020, 740 of 2020, 741 of 2020, 742 of 2020, 743 of 2020, 744 of 2020, 745 of 2020, 746 of 2020, 748 of 2020, 749 of 2020, 762 of 2020, 763 of 2020, 764 of 2020, 765 of 2020, 766 of 2020, 768 of 2020, 769 of 2020, 770 of 2020, 771 of 2020, 772 of 2020, 773 of 2020, 777 of 2020, 780 of 2020, 781 of 2020, 782 of 2020, 783 of 2020, 784 of 2020, 785 of 2020, 786 of 2020, 787 of 2020, 788 of 2020, 789 of 2020, 795 of 2020, 796 of 2020, 797 of 2020, 798 of 2020, 799 of 2020, 800 of 2020, 801 of 2020, 802 of 2020 and 6 of 2021
 

 
and with
 

 
Special Appeals (Defective) No. 837 of 2020, 981 of 2020, 1000 of 2020, 1032 of 2020, 1034 of 2020, 1035 of 2020, 1036 of 2020, 1037 of 2020, 1039 of 2020, 1041 of 2020, 1042 of 2020, 1043 of 2020, 1044 of 2020, 1045 of 2020, 1046 of 2020, 1047 of 2020, 1048 of 2020, 1049 of 2020, 1050 of 2020, 1051 of 2020, 1052 of 2020, 1102 of 2020, 1107 of 2020, 1112 of 2020, 1116 of 2020, 1122 of 2020, 1146 of 2020, 1157 of 2020, 1159 of 2020, 1164 of 2020, 1165 of 2020, 1170 of 2020, 1171 of 2020, 1173 of 2020, 1176 of 2020, 1177 of 2020, 1179 of 2020, 1221 of 2020, 1235 of 2020, 1237 of 2020, 1241 of 2020, 1250 of 2020, 1251 of 2020, 1252 of 2020, 1253 of 2020, 1255 of 2020, 1256 of 2020, 1258 of 2020, 1259 of 2020, 1266 of 2020, 1284 of 2020, 1322 of 2020 and 26 of 2021.
 

 
Hon'ble Munishwar Nath Bhandari,J.

Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.

(Delivered by Hon'ble Munishwar Nath Bhandari, J.)

Heard Sri Ashok Khare, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Siddharth Khare, Sri H.N. Singh, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Vineet Kumar Singh, Sri Radha Kant Ojha, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Shivendu Ojha, Sri Prabhakar Awasthi and Smt. Arti Raje, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/appellants. Sri M.C. Chaturvedi, Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri Rama Nand Pandey, Additional Chief Standing Counsel and Sri Rajiv Singh is appearing for the State Government, Sri Ashok Mehta, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Gagan Mehta is appearing for the Agra University and Sri J.N. Maurya, learned counsel is appearing for the U.P. Education Board/Basic Shiksha Adhikari.

The batch of appeals have been filed to assail the judgment dated 29.04.2020 whereby bunch of writ petitions were decided.

The writ petitions were filed to challenge the order passed by the District Basic Education Officer by which the appointments of the petitioners/appellants on the post of Assistant Teacher were cancelled/terminated. It was alleged that appointments sought were based on fake or tampered mark-sheets/degrees of B.Ed. Examination, 2005.

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE AND PREVIOUS LITIGATION

The facts available on record and taken into consideration by the learned Single Judge, reflect that the education was made a saleable product by the Dr. B.R. Ambedkar University, Agra (for short "University") and thereby the candidates, who even did not appear in B.Ed. Examination, 2005 were conferred with the mark-sheet and degree. The other allegation is for tampering of marks apart from candidates having same roll numbers on the mark-sheets.

The efface of the University came in the knowledge of the Court when a writ petition was filed by one Sunil Kumar bearing Writ Petition No. 2906 of 2013 on issuance of two mark-sheets to him by the University for B.Ed. Examination 2005. The learned Single Judge hearing the said writ petition directed the University to produce the tabulation sheets of B.Ed. Examination, 2005. In pursuance to the direction aforesaid, the tabulation sheets were produced. It was not bearing signature of any authorized officer/person of the University. The learned Single Judge hearing the said writ petition passed an order on 28.02.2013 directing the Vice Chancellor of the University to file an affidavit in respect to the B.Ed. Examination 2005. The affidavit was sworn. The learned Single Judge observed cross list/tabulation sheets to be manufactured documents in absence of signature of the officer. It was admitted by the University that tabulation sheets/cross list are always signed by the authorized officer/person otherwise it cannot be accepted as genuine.

In pursuance to the subsequent order dated 28.02.2013, the then Vice Chancellor Professor D.N. Jauhar filed an affidavit stating that a three member inquiry committee was constituted on the receipt of the complaint and information regarding manipulation and discrepancies in the mark charts. The committee found following discrepancies-:

(i) Font of computer printing on some pages are different from other pages;

(ii) Font quality on paper used in different pages defers;

(iii) The signature of authorized person of agency was also found different on different pages.

The learned Single Judge hearing the writ petition of Sunil Kumar passed another order on 23.01.2014 for impartial inquiry into the affairs of the University in regard to B.Ed. Examination, 2005. In pursuance to the order dated 23.01.2014, the State Government constituted a Special Investigation Team (For short "S.I.T."). The writ petition of Sunil Kumar was then treated to be a Public Interest Litigation, thus to be placed before the Division Bench. After referring the matter to the Division Bench, the record of said writ petition was not found traceable, thus matter could not be heard for further direction. The file was reconstituted in the year 2020 pursuant to the order of the Court.

The S.I.T. constituted by the State Government submitted its report dated 14.08.2017 before this Court after the investigation. As per the report, the allegation of issuance of fake mark-sheets apart from tampered mark-sheets were found based on the material collected during the course of investigation/inquiry.

After receipt of the report from the S.I.T., the University as well as the State Government decided to take action in the matter. The Director of Basic Education issued show cause notice to the petitioners/appellants. The show cause notice was challenged by a Writ Petition (A) No. 56739 of 2017 (Smt. Suryavati and 150 others Vs. State of U.P. and 24 others). An interim order was passed therein to continue the petitioners/appellants with payment of salary. The Court, however, allowed the Department to proceed in the matter in accordance to Rules. It was followed by large number of writ petitions.

The Basic Shiksha Adhikari passed the order of termination pursuant to the show cause notice. It was challenged separately by maintaining a writ petition. The first writ petition for it was Writ A No. 20244 of 2018 (Santosh Kuamr and others Vs. State of U.P. and others). The said writ petition was dismissed by the judgment dated 20.09.2018. The judgment in the case of Santosh Kumar (supra) was challenged by maintaining an appeal where an interim order was passed.

The University also proceeded in the matter and accordingly a notice was published in the news papers requiring the doubtful candidates to submit reply to the questionnaire supported by material. The validity of the show cause notice of the University was also challenged by Writ A No. 486 of 2020 (Tilak Singh and others Vs. State of U.P. and others). The said writ petition was dismissed by the learned Single Judge by its judgment dated 20.01.2020 with a direction to the University to proceed further in the matter.

In pursuance to the show cause notice given by the University, majority of candidates, alleged to have fake mark-sheets, did not submit any reply and in few cases, reply was submitted with incomplete information and documents or after the last date for it. Only 18 candidates/students submitted proper reply along with documents. The University cancelled B.Ed. degree of 2823 candidates by the order dated 07.02.2020, who failed to submit reply. The order dated 07.02.2020 was passed during the pendency of the writ petition. It was brought on record by way of an affidavit by the University. The hearing of the writ petition commenced thereafter on different dates. The arguments were concluded on 06.03.2020 and thereupon the impugned judgment was pronounced on 29.04.2020.

The learned Single Judge decided the batch of writ petitions with certain directions in paragraph 69 of the impugned judgment which has been assailed by the appellants herein.

In few appeals, there is delay and in few appeals, an application to seek leave for appeal has been submitted. The application for condonation of delay so as the leave to appeal are allowed as otherwise no objection to it has been raised by the side opposite. It is looking to the fact that few appeals have been preferred within limitation, thus, would be decided on merits and judgments therein would apply on all the appeals and accordingly even leave to appeal is granted because the applicants are either effected by the impugned judgment or in their pending writ petitions they cannot get result unless judgment in question is set aside. Thus, prayed for leave and accordingly granted for the ends of justice. Accordingly, all the appeal were heard together.

Before we proceed to refer to the arguments of the learned counsel for the appellants, it would be material to refer judgment in the case of Tilak Singh & others Vs. State of U.P. and others, Writ-A 468 of 2020. The said writ petition was decided by the judgment dated 20.01.2020. It is without causing interference the show cause notice given by the University though certain formalities were interfered which were basically to have verification of documents through the Principal etc. but no interference in the material information sought by the University was caused rather a direction was given to the University to proceed in the matter in regard to the degrees which are alleged to be forged. The procedure given under Section 67 of U.P. State Universities Act, 1973 was not required to be applied for fake degrees though it was mandated for the tampered mark-sheet.

All the facts narrated above are relevant and otherwise summarised by the counsel for the appellants.

ARGUMENTS OF LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANTS

Learned counsel submits that the appellants were appointed on the post of Assistant Teacher after undergoing the selection as per U.P. Basic Education Staff Rules, 1973 (in short "Rules of 1973"). All the appellants were thus regular employees and even granted promotion during the intervening period. They could not have terminated from service without a departmental enquiry under the U.P. Government Servant (Punishment & Appeal) Rules, 1999 (In short "Rules of 1999"). They could not have been terminated from service only by serving a show cause notice. Learned Single Judge failed to consider this aspect of the matter. The show cause notice was even stayed in the set of another litigation initiated by Suryavati and 150 others (supra). During currency of the interim order, the respondents could not have proceeded to pass termination order. It is more so when there was no material with the State Government to infer B.Ed. degrees of the appellants either fake or tampered. The State Government could not have relied on the report submitted by the S.I.T. It was barely an opinion of the S.I.T. thus could not have been treated to be substantive piece of evidence. The report of the S.I.T. would be tested by the court in the criminal trial. Thus, the sole basis to terminate the services of the appellants was not made out.

It is further urged that the learned Single Judge could not have decided the writ petition in reference to the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University to cancel the degrees finding it to be fake, as no opportunity was given to them to assail the order dated 07.02.2020. It is despite their request.

The learned Single Judge decided the writ petition after taking adverse inference pursuant to the order of the University dated 07.02.2020 cancelling the degrees of the appellants. The Court should have given opportunity to challenge the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University.

The learned Single Judge has even drawn a statement to classify the number of candidates obtained fake mark-sheets while others having tampered mark-sheets. The third category is of the candidates having mark-sheets with same roll numbers. The statement of candidates given in the judgment should not be relied as otherwise S.I.T. has given data on their own assumption. The appellants have challenged S.I.T. report in the case of Sunil Kumar (Supra) which petition was converted into Public Interest Litigation and is yet to be decided. The finding of the learned Single Judge that the appellants have not challenged the S.I.T. report is thus perversed.

The learned Single Judge has relied the judgment in the case of Tilak Singh (Supra) though the said writ petition was against the show cause notice given by the University, thus dismissed. The judgment in the case of Tilak Singh (Supra) has not decided any issue pertaining to the case rather directed the University to proceed further in the matter, thus no final decision was given holding certain mark-sheet to be fake or tampered. The learned Single Judge should not have relied on the judgment in the case of Tilak Singh (Supra).

The report of S.I.T. considered by learned Single Judge was based on superficial mathematical calculation. No supporting material exist to arrive at the calculation of eligible candidates for B.Ed. Examination, 2005 with the figures students actually appeared followed by declaration of the result of excess candidates. The S.I.T. had failed to take note of the judgment of Lucknow Bench in the case of Shri Puran Prasad Gupta Memorial Degree College Vs. State of U.P. dated 06.04.2007 passed in Writ Petition No.399 (M.B.) 2007 wherein a direction was given to declare the result of additional students. The S.I.T. failed to take note of those students while making calculation of the studens appeared in the examination. Thus, there was no reason for the learned Single Judge to place reliance on the S.I.T. report.

It is also submitted that even if the learned Single Judge was to proceed with a matter in reference to the order dated 07.05.2020 passed by the University cancelling the degrees, it should not have been in ignorance of the fact that out of total 3637 candidates, 814 candidates had submitted reply but while passing the order dated 07.02.2020, the University cancelled the degree of all the candidates without giving any reason. The order dated 07.02.2020 should not have been relied by the learned Single Judge.

So far as finding regarding tampered mark-sheet is concerned, the judgment of learned Single Judge is in ignorance of the fact the candidates had no access to the record of the University to become instrument to tamper the mark-sheet. In fact mark-sheets were issued immediately with declaration of result. Thus, there was no occasion for any candidates to tamper the mark-sheet.

The tampering of mark-sheets in fact did not effect even the candidature to seek appointments on the post of the Assistant Teacher as it was based on the selection test where all the candidates remained successful. It was also stated that if candidates were involved in tampering of the mark-sheets, their marks would not have been reduced whereas in many cases, marks of the candidates were less compared to the marks in the foil recovered by the S.I.T. Thus, allegation of tampering of mark-sheet was not even made out. The allegation of tampering of the mark-sheets is also without any basis as neither tabulation sheets were available nor original marks foil were recovered by the S.I.T. The record seized by the S.I.T. is lying with it or with the Registrar of High Court. The original marks foil may accordingly be called to consider the argument aforesaid.

In view of above, termination order should have been interfered by the learned Single Judge. The denial of wages during the intervening period till the University passes the order after compliance of the procedure given under Section 67 of the State Universities Act, 1973 in regards to tampered mark sheets is also illegal.

Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that if a direction is given to the University to pass an order in regard to tampered mark-sheets after following the procedure given under Section 67 of the Act, then appellants would have no grievance rather submitted that subject to the outcome of the order pursuant to it, the order of termination be governed. If the decision of the University comes adverse to them then they would not question their termination order but in case of favourable report, it should be interfered thus appropriate order for it may be passed.

It is also submitted that the marks foil recovered by the SIT is not of all the papers of B.Ed. Examination rather is of two papers only. The aforesaid should not have been taken to be a decisive factor to hold mark-sheets to be tampered.

Some of the counsel of the appellants even challenged the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University cancelling B.Ed. degrees of 2005 of 2823 candidates. It is submitted that the University proceeded to pass the order dated 07.02.2020 solely based on the report of SIT. It is by presuming admission of the allegation by the candidates in absence of reply to show cause notice containing a questionnaire. The University could not have cancelled the degrees only in reference to the report of SIT. Thus the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University may also be interfered. The learned counsel pressing the appeal for challenge to the order dated 07.02.2020 submitted that an opportunity to challenge the said order was not given by the learned Single Judge, thus it has been challenged in these appeals.

One set of the counsel appearing for the appellants, however, submitted that they do not prefer to challenge the order dated 07.02.2020 in these appeals as for that separate writ petitions can be filed or even filed. The fact however remains that one set of the appellants have challenged the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University and accordingly, we need to decide the issue aforesaid, otherwise this judgment may be criticized alleging that despite a challenge to the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University, consideration of argument has not been made by us. Accordingly, we proceed to determine all the issues raised before us not only in reference to the challenge to the judgment of the learned Single Judge but the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University.

No other arguments have been raised by the appellants other than what have been mentioned above. The written arguments have been submitted by the counsel but we are confining to the oral argument before this Court and otherwise the written arguments should have been confined to the oral argument made before this Court.

The prayer of learned counsel for appellants is to set aside the termination order so as the judgment of learned Single Judge or pass any other appropriate order in the fitness of the case. The order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University may also be quashed. Learned counsel for the appellants have cited judgments to support their arguments which would be referred by this Court while recording finding on the rival submission of the parties.

The prayer of learned counsel for appellants is to consider the documents submitted on the direction of this Court to show that the candidates were having required documents to show their admission in the college followed by payment of fee apart from issuance of admit cards for appearance in the examination followed by other documents to show their appearance in the examination. At this stage, it is also stated that University has passed an order to cancel remaining fake mark-sheets and degrees other than of two students by the order dated 27.07.2020. It is out of 814 students/candidates.

ARGUMENTS OF LEARNED COUNSEL FOR SIDE OPPOSITE

Per contra, the contest to the appeals has been made by the counsel appearing for the State and the University. The have supported the judgment of the learned Single Judge.

It is submitted by the Senior Counsel appearing for the University that pursuant to the direction of this Court in the case of Sunil Kumar (supra), the University had initially constituted a Committee of three members. The Committee found that font of the cross sheet/tabulation sheet is different on certain pages. It is apart from the different font size in the cross sheet/tabulation register. The University, thus realized manipulation and malpractices in the B.Ed. examination of 2005. It decided to proceed against the officers involved in the manipulations.

The matter was referred to SIT by the State Government for investigation followed by a report in the light of the direction in the case of Sunil Kumar (supra). On the receipt of the report from S.I.T., the State Government gave direction to University to proceed in the matter and accordingly the University decided to issue show cause notice to the candidates by publishing it in the newspaper requiring the candidates to submit their reply to the questionnaire with supporting material. The show cause notice was challenged by Tilak Singh and 495 other candidates. The writ petition was dismissed vide judgment dated 20.01.2020 with a direction to the University to proceed in the matter of fake mark-sheets without observing Section 67 of the Act of 1973 but for tampered mark-sheets, to proceed under Section 67 of the Act of 1973. The University accordingly proceeded in compliance to the judgment in the case of Tilak Singh (supra) as the judgment in the said case was not challenged thus attained finality.

In pursuance to the notice published in the newspaper, reply was submitted only by 814 candidates within the time prescribed for it. It was out of 4766 candidates which was for fake degree as well as tampered. 2823 candidates did not send reply to show cause notice while 814 candidates sent the reply, however out of 814 also 796 candidates did not submit complete information sought in the show cause notice. Only 18 candidates submitted proper reply with material. The University thus proceeded to pass order dated 07.02.2020 holding that 2823 students are having fake degrees. It is thus incorrect to state that by the order dated 07.02.2020, all the degrees were declared fake, which includes the degrees of 814 candidates. It is also incorrect that the University has declared 2823 candidates to be fake based on the report of the SIT. In fact, the report of the SIT was the basis to initiate the action and accordingly proper questionnaire was prepared by the University to independently assess the allegations. The failure of the candidates to submit the reply was taken adverse. There was no reason for the candidates not to submit reply to the notice with relevant materials. The University proceeded in the matter pursuant to the direction of the Court in the case of Tilak Singh (supra). Thus there is no illegality in the order dated 07.02.2020. The appellants have not submitted any material even while filing the appeal and direction of this Court other than seven candidates those who had even submitted reply to the show cause notice.

The learned counsel for the University has given details of all the students who could have appeared in B.Ed. Examination of 2005. It is by referring to the number of institutions recognized by the N.C.T. and the students to be admitted by each of the institutions. It is submitted that out of total 82 institutions having recognition from the N.C.T., each was entitle to admit 100 students, 50 percent through management quota and 50 percent through counselling or 15 percent through management quota and 85 percent through counselling. A controversy regarding quota through counselling came in reference to 25 self-financed/unaided colleges which was subject matter of litigation and pursuant to which, many self-financed/unaided colleges, were permitted to admit 135 students. The university however declared the final results keeping in mind the intake of each institution though 135 students appeared in many self-financed institutions. Thus, as per the direction of the Court in the case of Sri Puram Prasad Gupta Memorial Degree College (supra), by the judgment dated 06.04.2007, result of all the students, who appeared in the examination was declared.

Taking aforesaid to be an input, it is submitted that maximum 9075 students could have appeared in the examination if it is figured out with 100 students for all the 82 colleges coming to 8200 with addition of 35 students for 25 self-financed/unaided institutions coming to 875 totalling to 9070. It is the maximum number of students though, admission was given to 8899 students.

8899 students appeared in the examination out of which 869 were those who were admitted in excess to the approved strength of 100 students pursuant to the direction of the Lucknow Bench. In fact, in all the self-financed/unaided institutions, total excess admission were 869 against 35 additional seats given to it. As against 8899 students appeared in the examination, the result of 8930 students was declared thereby it was in excess by 31 students. The marks foil recovered by the S.I.T. proves the fact aforesaid. The original marks foil was seen by the Court as well as counsel for the appellants during the course of argument. The tabulation chart/cross sheet of the University was however containing result of 12472 students.

In the light of the fact aforesaid, even the counsel for the appellants have admitted that result in the tabulation sheet is in excess to students appeared in the examination even pursuant to the direction of Bench at Lucknow. The question however raised by them is that the excess students may not be the appellants but others.

It is submitted that S.I.T. made report based on the record recovered by them from the University. The material recovered by the S.I.T. was input for the action and thereby University had issued show cause notice to verify the truth after giving an opportunity to the students. The students failed to send reply to the questionnaire with material. They were accordingly declared to be fake students as otherwise they would have given the reply to the questionnaire. It is more so when this Court in the case of Tilak Singh (supra) directed the University to proceed with the matter in regard to fake students and judgment in that case has already attained finality. Thus, the learned Single Judge has rightly drawn conclusion about the fake students and for that there is no basis to challenge the order dated 07.02.2020. The petitioners/appellants have not submitted any material or documents pursuant to questionnaire even while challenging the order of termination passed by the State Government or now the order dated 07.02.2020 other than by few. It is even while filing the appeal despite an opportunity for it. The documents have been filed only by few students who had otherwise submitted their reply pursuant to the show cause notice of the University. Thus, other than few students, who are maximum 18 in number, none has produced any material before the Court to show truthfulness of their appearance in the examination. Accordingly, no basis remains to cause interference in the order dated 07.02.2020 and the order passed by learned Single Judge. The University has even passed an order dated 27.07.2020 to declare 812 students to be fake out of 814 students.

It is also stated that University has proceed to cause disciplinary inquiry against those involved in the racket.

So far as the allegation of tampering of the mark-sheets is concerned, the University would proceed to take action after applying Section 67 of the Act of 1973.

Learned counsel has even made a reference of the F.I.R. registered against those indulged in issuance of fake mark-sheets so as the tampered. The charge-sheet has also been filed pursuant to four F.I.Rs. It is also stated that a Committee under the Chairmanship of a retired Judge was constituted to fix the responsibilities of those officers involved in this case and accordingly respondents would proceed to take action against all those officers involved in this case.

Learned counsel for the University further submits that during the course of hearing of the case of Sunil Kumar (supra), it was noticed that three bags of fake mark-sheets were found at the residence of Principal of one affiliated college of the University. The fact aforesaid was flashed even in the newspaper, thus, the conduct of the then officer of the University and the students is writ large.

In view of the above, this Court may not cause interference in the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge.

Learned counsel appearing for the University has made further argument and it would be elaborately discussed during the course of consideration of the rival arguments to avoid repetition.

Learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the State has also supported the judgment of learned Single Judge. It is submitted that in pursuance to the direction of this Court in the case of Sunil Kumar (supra), criminal racket involved in issuance of the fake and tampered mark-sheets came in the notice of the State Government. It may be when a writ petition was filed by Sunil Kumar showing two mark-sheets issued to him for B.Ed. Examination, 2005. The reference of the case to the S.I.T. was pursuant to the direction of the Court and accordingly State Government constituted 5 members to investigate the affairs of the University in reference to the B.Ed. Examination of 2005. The S.I.T. had given detailed report in reference to the material collected by it during the course of investigation. It could recover the material which includes marks foil to draw its report finding cases not only of tampering but issuance of the fake mark-sheets. It was also for issuance of mark-sheets to the students with same roll number.

On the receipt of the report, the Government issued direction not only to the University but even to the Basic Shiksha Adhikari for appropriate action. The show cause notice was issued and when reply to it was not found satisfactory, passed the order of termination finding case of obtaining service based on the forged or tampered mark-sheets. The writ petition was then filed by the appellants but therein also, they failed to supply material to prove their appearance in B.Ed. Examination of 2005. Seven appellants have produced the material pursuant to the direction of this Court to show their appearances in B.Ed. Examination 2005. It is while three other failed to produce document to prove their appearance in the Examination 2005. This itself is enough to show that even the petitioners/appellants failed to produce any material before the Court to prove their appearance in the Examination of 2005 so as to challenge the allegation of obtaining fake mark-sheets.

The racket was involved in this case has been admitted even by the appellants realising that as against the intake capacity of each college with additional seats permitted by the High Court, the total students could not have been 12,472. The question however raised is as to whether the excess students having forged mark-sheets are the petitioners/appellants or others. The argument aforesaid has been raised without realising that to prove genuineness of B.Ed. degree, appellants failed to produce material in reference to the show cause notice before the order of termination and even along with the writ petition. Thus, truthfulness of the allegation against the petitioners/appellants gets satisfied on the face of record. In view of the above, the challenge to the judgment may not be accepted.

Learned Additional Advocate General has further submitted that for passing the order of termination, Regulations of 1999 were not required to be applied. The appointment taken based on the forged or tampered mark-sheets were void. The compliance of Regulation of 1999 is not envisaged in such cases rather for that the Government was not even required to issue a show cause notice. However, to provide an opportunity to submit the necessary documents to prove appearance in the B.Ed. Examination, 2005, a show cause notice was given. The order of termination was passed thereupon when appellant failed to give satisfactory reply supported with material. It is thus incorrect to state that the order of termination is simply based on the S.I.T. report.

It is also submitted that merely for the reason that petitioners/appellants are in service for the last 10 to 15 years would not vitiate the action taken by the State as the foundation of appointment is based on forgery. Such appointments remain void ab-initio and thereby the learned Single Judge has rightly refused to cause interference in the order of termination. The learned Additional Advocate General cited the judgments to support the argument which would be referred at the time of discussion of rival submissions.

Learned Additional Advocate General has further given reply to all the arguments raised by the learned counsel for appellants for challenge to the judgment of learned Single Judge which could also be referred at the time of dealing with the arguments to avoid bulkiness of the judgment.

DISCUSSION OF THE ISSUES BY THE COURT

We have considered the rival submissions of the parties and scanned the matter carefully.

It is a case where District Basic Education Officer passed an order of termination/cancellation of the appointments given to the appellants on the post of Assistant Teacher on the ground that appointments were sought based on fake or tampered mark-sheets of B.Ed. Examination, 2005. The termination/cancellation of the appointments were after giving opportunity of hearing by serving a show cause notice. The order of termination/cancellation of appointments of the appellants was challenged by maintaining a writ petition. The learned Single Judge found appointment based on fake mark-sheets of B.Ed. Examination, 2005 so as the tampered. The fact about issuance of fake or tampered mark-sheets came to the notice of the respondents when S.I.T. made investigation pursuant to the case registered on the direction of this Court in the writ petition filed by one Sunil Kumar (supra). The brief detail of the litigation thereupon has been given but needs to be reiterated for ready reference.

The brief facts pertaining to the case show that on a writ petition filed by one Sunil Kumar (supra), this Court passed orders from time to time to direct the University not only to file affidavit but constitution of the investigation team by the State Government in regard to B.Ed. Examination 2005 conducted by the University. It is on finding manipulation in the B.Ed. Examination, 2005. Pursuant to the direction of the Court, S.I.T. conducted investigation followed by a report. The F.I.R. was registered for offence under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 204, 201 read with 120 I.P.C. and 13 (1) (d), 13 (2) and 13 (3) of Prevention of Corruption Act. The charge sheet in all the cases has been filed other than one.

The judgment of learned Single Judge has been challenged by the appellants on the ground that non interference in the order of termination from the service is mainly in reference to the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University declaring 2823 degrees to be fake. It is without realising that the order dated 07.02.2020 was passed during the pendency of the writ petition. The appellants had no opportunity to challenge it. The judgment of learned Single Judge in reference to dismissal of the writ petition of 2823 candidates has been questioned on the aforesaid ground apart from many other grounds. We would be dealing with each of the arguments raised by the counsel for parties.

The first argument raised by counsel for the appellant is in reference to the Regulation of 1999. It is stated that the order of termination has been passed without causing inquiry by applying the procedure given under the Rules of 1999. It is despite the fact that all the appellants were appointed under the Rules of 1973 and were permanent employees. Few of them were given promotion.

The judgments to support the argument have also been referred. The argument in reference to Rules of 1999 has been raised without realising the foundation for passing the order of termination. The termination order is in reference to the appointments based on the forged and tampered mark-sheets. If appointment is sought based on the forged or tampered documents, then remains void and in those circumstances, the procedure given under the U.P. Government Servant (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1999 is not required to be applied.

The main thrust of argument of the counsel for the appellants is without taking note of the aforesaid aspect. They have relied on the judgment of Apex Court in the case of Mahipal Singh Tomar Vs. State of U.P., 2013 (16) SCC 771. A perusal of the judgment shows altogether on different facts. Para 13 and 14 of the said judgment has been relied by the learned counsel for the appellants without taking note of the facts of that case. In the instant case, the appellants were served with the show cause notice and it is after considering their reply, if submitted, the order of termination was passed. It is in reference to the forged or tampered B.Ed. degree.

The other judgment referred by the learned counsel for the appellants is in the case of Inderpreet Singh Kahlon Vs. State of Punjab and others, 2006 (11) SCC 356. In the said case, the entire selection process was cancelled said to be vitiated by corruption. The Court found that the evidence need to be adduced before the Court to prove that selection was tainted due to mass cheating. The case in hand is having distinguishable facts inasmuch as before passing the order, the respondents issued show cause notice on the petitioners/appellants and thereupon the order was passed. Sufficient material has been produced before the Court to show that appointment was secured based on forged and tampered mark-sheets, thus it was void. The judgment aforesaid provide no assistance to the appellants on the facts of this case.

In fact, procedure given under the Rules of 1999 is to be applied if the appointment is not based on forged or tampered documents.

As against the judgment cited by the learned counsel for the appellants, learned counsel for the State has cited judgments directly applicable to the facts of the case. A reference of the judgment in the case of Union of India and another Vs. Raghuwar Pal Singh, (2018) 15 SCC 463 for it would be relevant. In the said case, the order of termination was passed without an opportunity of hearing. The Apex Court refused to cause interference in the order and thereby the judgment of the High Court was set aside by restoring the judgment of Central Administrative Tribunal holding termination to be legal. Para 19 and 20 of the said judgment are quoted herein for ready reference-:

"19. We shall now consider the efficacy of the reason so recorded in the office order. The recruitment procedure in relation to the post of Veterinary Compounder is governed by the statutory rules titled, Central Cattle Breeding Farms (Class III and Class IV posts) Recruitment Rules, 1969, as amended from time to time and including the executive instructions issued in that behalf. As per the stated dispensation for such recruitment, the appointment letter could be issued only by an authorised officer and after grant of approval by the competent authority. Nowhere in the Original Application filed by the respondent, it has been asserted that such prior approval is not the quintessence for issuing a letter of appointment.

20. For taking this contention forward, we may assume, for the time being, that the then Director Incharge H.S. Rathore, Agriculture Officer had the authority to issue a letter of appointment. Nevertheless, he could do so only upon obtaining prior written approval of the competent authority. No case has been made out in the Original Application that due approval was granted by the competent authority before issue of the letter of appointment to the respondent. Thus, it is indisputable that no prior approval of the competent authority was given for the appointment of the respondent. In such a case, the next logical issue that arises for consideration is: whether the appointment letter issued to the respondent, would be a case of nullity or a mere irregularity? If it is a case of nullity, affording opportunity to the incumbent would be a mere formality and non grant of opportunity may not vitiate the final decision of termination of his services. The Tribunal has rightly held that in absence of prior approval of the competent authority, the Director Incharge could not have hastened issuance of the appointment letter. The act of commission and omission of the then Director Incharge would, therefore, suffer from the vice of lack of authority and nullity in law."

Same view was taken by the Apex Court in the case of State of Bihar and others Vs. Kirti Narayan Prasad, (2019) 13 SCC 250. In the aforesaid case, the regularisation sought by the petitioner was not permitted as claim was based on forged appointment letters. The termination order was thus not interfered. Para 16 of the said judgment is quoted herein-:

"16. In the instant cases the writ petitioners have filed the petitions before the High Court with a specific prayer to regularize their service and to set aside the order of termination of their services. They have also challenged the report submitted by the State Committee. The real controversy is whether the writ petitioners were legally and validly appointed. The finding of the State Committee is that many writ petitioners had secured appointment by producing fake or forged appointment letter or had been inducted in Government service surreptitiously by concerned Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer by issuing a posting order. The writ petitioners are the beneficiaries of illegal orders made by the Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer. They were given notice to establish the genuineness of their appointment and to show cause. None of them could establish the genuineness or legality of their appointment before the State Committee. The State Committee on appreciation of the materials on record has opined that their appointment was illegal and void ab initio. We do not find any ground to disagree with the finding of the State Committee. In the circumstances, the question of regularisation of their services by invoking para 53 of the judgment in Umadevi (supra) does not arise. Since the appointment of the petitioners is ab initio void, they cannot be said to be the civil servants of the State. Therefore, holding disciplinary proceedings envisaged by Article 311 of the Constitution or under any other disciplinary rules shall not arise."

The same view was taken by the Apex Court in the case of Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority and another Vs. Karamjit Singh, AIR 2019 SC 1913; (2019) 16 SCC 782.

The argument therein was in reference to the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The argument was not accepted by the Apex Court finding appointment to be illegal. The regularization sought by misrepresentation of fact. The judgment relied by the High Court in the case of Managing Director, ECIL Hyderabad, AIR 1944 SC 1074 was not approved. Para 6, 6.1, 6.2 and 7 are quoted herein-:

"6. In the present case, the Single Judge had held that "rightly or wrongly", the Respondent had obtained regularization, and was therefore entitled to a disciplinary enquiry. The Division Bench affirmed the Judgment of the Single Judge.

6.1. The High Court however failed to appreciate that the decision in Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad (supra) is applicable to "employees" of Government Departments. Since the very appointment of the Respondent on regular basis was illegal, he could not be treated as an "employee" of the Appellant - Authority.

In Rupa Rani Rakshit & Ors. v. Jharkhand Gramin Bank & Ors., this Court held that service rendered in pursuance of an illegal appointment or promotion cannot be equated to service rendered in pursuance of a valid and lawful appointment or promotion.

6.2. The illegality of such an appointment goes to the root of the Respondent's absorption as a regular employee. The Respondent could not be considered to be an "employee", and would not be entitled to any benefits under the Regulations applicable to employees of the Appellant - Authority.

Therefore, the High Court erroneously placed reliance on the decision in Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad (supra), which would not be applicable to the facts of the present case.

7. The question of holding disciplinary proceedings as envisaged under Article 311 of the Constitution, or under any other disciplinary rules did not arise in the present case since the Respondent was admittedly not an "employee" of the Appellant - Authority, and did not hold a civil post under the State Government. He was merely a daily wager on the muster rolls of the Appellant - Authority."

The judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Nidhi Kaim and another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others, (2017) 4 SCC 1 is also relevant. The medical examination was cancelled when it was found to be based on cheating, unfair means and leakage of question paper. It was held that "fraud unravels everything".

The another judgment of the Apex Court relied by the learned counsel for respondents is in the case of Bank of India and another Vs. Avinash D. Mandivikar and others, (2005) 7 SCC 690. The judgment of the Apex Court in the case of R. Vishwanatha Pillai Vs. State of Kerala and others, (2004) 2 SCC 105 was cited in reference to Article 311 which was not held to be applicable in case appointment is procured based on false caste certificate. Such an appointment was not held to be an appointment in the eyes of law. The dismissal of person from service, thus, was not to attract Article 311 so as the All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969.

The judgment aforesaid answers the question raised by the appellants in regard to the application of Rules of 1999 for passing the order of termination. The observance of the Rules of 1999 and Article 311 of the Constitution of India is not warranted in the cases where appointment was taken by fraudulent means. Para 15 of the said judgment is quoted herein for ready reference-:

"This apart, the appellant obtained the appointment in the service on the basis that he belonged to a Scheduled Caste community. When it was found by the Scrutiny Committee that he did not belong to the Scheduled Caste community, then the very basis of his appointment was taken away. His appointment was no appointment in the eye of law. He cannot claim a right to the post as he had usurped the post meant for a reserved candidate by playing a fraud and producing a false caste certificate. Unless the appellant can lay a claim to the post on the basis of his appointment he cannot claim the constitutional guarantee given under the Article 311 of the Constitution. As he had obtained the appointment on the basis of a false caste certificate he cannot be considered to be a person who holds a post within the meaning of Article 311 of the Constitution of India. Finding recorded by the Scrutiny Committee that the appellant got the appointment on the basis of false caste certificate has become final. The position, therefore, is that the appellant has usurped the post which should have gone to a member of the Scheduled Caste. In view of the finding recorded by the Scrutiny Committee and upheld upto this Court he has disqualified himself to hold the post. The appointment was void from its inception. It cannot be said that the said void appointment would enable the appellant to claim that he was holding a civil post within the meaning of Article 311 of the Constitution of India. As appellant had obtained the appointment by playing a fraud he cannot be allowed to take advantage of his own fraud in entering the service and claim that he was holder of the post entitled to be dealt with in terms of Article 311 of the Constitution of India or the Rules framed thereunder. Where an appointment in a service has been acquired by practising fraud or deceit such an appointment is no appointment in law, in service and in such a situation Article 311 of the Constitution is not attracted at all."

The same view has been taken by the Patna High Court in the case of Rita Misra and others Vs. Director, Primary Education, Bihar, AIR 1988 (Patna) 26 which is approved by the Apex Court in the case of R. Vishwanatha (supra).

In view of the judgments referred to above, we find no substance in the first argument raised by the learned counsel for appellants. The procedure given under the Rule of 1999 was not required to be applied for an order of termination in reference to fake or tampered mark-sheets and degrees.

The other issue raised by counsel for the appellants is about the delay in initiation of action. It is stated that appellants are serving with the respondents (Basic Education) for the last 10 to 15 years. Their services have been terminated ignoring the aforesaid.

The issue of delay in passing the order of termination is of no substance. It is not only for the reason that the fraudulent affairs of the University came into notice to the High Court when the writ petition was filed by Sunil Kumar (supra) in the year 2013.

The efface of the University in regard to B.Ed. Examination 2005 was investigated by the S.I.T. on the direction of the Court. It is on collection of material, the fact about issuance of fake mark-sheets apart from tampered came in notice of the State. The action was immediately initiated thereupon not only by the State but the University. The issue of delay has otherwise been considered by the Apex Court in the case of R. Vishwanatha Pillai Vs. State of Kerala and others, (2004) 2 SCC 105 therein the action was taken after 27 years. The Apex Court refused to accept the plea in the light of the fact that the appointments secured based on fraud is void. The writ petition therein was filed by the son to secure the pensionary benefits. The long service was not accepted as a ground to secure the pensionary benefits. Para 15 and 19 of the said judgment are quoted herein for ready reference-:

"15. This apart, the appellant obtained the appointment in the service on the basis that he belonged to a Scheduled Caste community. When it was found by the Scrutiny Committee that he did not belong to the Scheduled Caste community, then the very basis of his appointment was taken away. His appointment was no appointment in the eyes of law. He cannot claim a right to the post as he had usurped the post meant for a reserved candidate by playing a fraud and producing a false caste certificate. Unless the appellant can lay a claim to the post on the basis of his appointment he cannot claim the constitutional guarantee given under the Article 311 of the Constitution. As he had obtained the appointment on the basis of a false caste certificate he cannot be considered to be a person who holds a post within the meaning of Article 311 of the Constitution of India. Finding recorded by the Scrutiny Committee that the appellant got the appointment on the basis of false caste certificate has become final. The position, therefore, is that the appellant has usurped the post which should have gone to a member of the Scheduled Caste. In view of the finding recorded by the Scrutiny Committee and upheld upto this Court he has disqualified himself to hold the post. Appointment was void from its inception. It cannot be said that the said void appointment would enable the appellant to claim that he was holding a civil post within the meaning of Article 311 of the Constitution of India. As appellant had obtained the appointment by playing a fraud he cannot be allowed to take advantage of his own fraud in entering the service and claim that he was holder of the post entitled to be dealt with in terms of Article 311 of the Constitution of India or the Rules framed thereunder. Where an appointment in a service has been acquired by practising fraud or deceit such an appointment is no appointment in law, in service and in such a situation Article 311 of the Constitution is not attracted at all.

19. It was then contended by Shri Ranjit Kumar, learned senior counsel for the appellant that since the appellant has rendered about 27 years of service the order of dismissal be substituted by an order of compulsory retirement or removal from service to protect the pensionary benefits of the appellant. We do not find any substance in this submission, as well. The rights to salary, pension and other service benefits are entirely statutory in nature in public service. Appellant obtained the appointment against a post meant for a reserved candidate by producing a false caste certificate and by playing a fraud. His appointment to the post was void and non est in the eyes of law. The right to salary or pension after retirement flow from a valid and legal appointment. The consequential right of pension and monetary benefits can be given only if the appointment was valid and legal. Such benefits cannot be given in a case where the appointment was found to have been obtained fraudulently and rested on false caste certificate. A person who entered the service by producing a false caste certificate and obtained appointment for the post meant for Scheduled Caste thus depriving the genuine Scheduled Caste of appointment to that post does not deserve any sympathy or indulgence of this Court. A person who seeks equity must come with clean hands. He, who comes to the Court with false claims, cannot plead equity nor the Court would be justified to exercise equity jurisdiction in his favour. A person who seeks equity must act in a fair and equitable manner. Equity jurisdiction cannot be exercised in the case of a person who got the appointment on the basis of false caste certificate by playing a fraud. No sympathy and equitable consideration can come to his rescue. We are of the view that equity or compassion cannot be allowed to bend the arms of law in a case where an individual acquired a status by practising fraud."

The Apex Court refused to grant relief on compassion or equity even though the deceased had rendered 27 years of service. The prayer to substitute the order of dismissal by compulsory retirement or removal to protect pensionary benefits was not accepted therein.

In view of the above, we do not find that mere rendering the service for more than 10 years can be a ground to set aside the order of termination. If the prayer is accepted, then it would mean endorsement of fake or tampered mark-sheets.

The next question advanced by counsel for the appellants is in reference to an interim order passed by the Court in the case of Smt. Suryavati and 150 others (supra) on the show cause notice issued by the State Government. A perusal of the interim order goes against the appellants in view of the fact that learned Single Judge while protecting the salary of the appellants, allowed the respondents to proceed in the matter as per Rules and accordingly there was no restrain to proceed in the matter for passing the order of termination or cancellation of the order of appointment. If there would have been disobedience of the Court's order in the said writ petitions, the appellants could have moved for contempt. The fact is that no contempt petition was preferred. Thus, challenge to the order of termination in reference to the interim order passed by the Court in the case of Suryavati and 152 others Vs. State of U.P. and 24 others, Writ A No. 56739 of 2017 remains of no consequence. For ready reference, the operative portion of the order dated 29.11.2017 in the case of Suryavati and 152 others (supra) is quoted herein-:

"Reliance has been placed on the decisions rendered by this Court in Writ Petition No. 399 (MB) of 2007 (Shri Puran Prasad Gupta Memorial Degree College Versus State of U.P. and others) decided on 6 April 2007 and in Service Single No. 3335 of 2001 (Akhtyar Ahmad Versus State of U.P. and others) decided on 7 August 2015.

Submission requires consideration.

Till the next date of listing, it will be open for the respondents to initiate proceedings against the petitioners for removal/termination in accordance with the Rules. Respondents, however, in the mean time are restrained from interfering in the functioning of the petitioners, they shall be entitled to their salary as and when due which shall abide by the outcome of the proceedings initiated against the petitioners."

It is not correct to state that respondents passed order of termination in defiance of the order quoted above. There was no restrain in passing the order of termination.

It is also urged by the learned counsel for appellants that the report of S.I.T. was made basis for passing the order of termination whereas report is not final in nature rather would be subject matter of trial in criminal case. The fact aforesaid has been clarified by the learned Additional Advocate General for the State. The sequence of the events in reference to the earlier litigation has been given in the opening paras. It started with a writ petition filed by Sunil Kumar (supra). The S.I.T. was constituted by the State Government pursuant to the direction of this Court. The S.I.T. collected material in the course of inquiry/investigation. A report was then submitted.

The basis for taking action is the material collected by the S.I.T. and not the report alone. It is thus incorrect to state that no material was available with the respondents to proceed in the matter. The fact about manipulation came in the notice of the High Court on filing of a writ petition by Sunil Kumar (supra), when he was given two mark-sheets of B.Ed. Examination, 2005. A direction and on the production of affidavit by the Vice Chancellor, this Court observed about manufacturing of tabulation sheets, thus, directed the State Government to refer the matter to CBCID. The S.I.T. was constituted thereupon. During the course of investigation, the marks foil were recovered to assess how many marks were given by the examiner to each of the candidates apart from the fact as to how many candidates appeared in the B.Ed. Examination 2005. The details of it has been given by the learned Single Judge. The result of 12472 students was declared whereas admission and appearance of the students in the examination was less than to it. The figure of students appeared in the examination revealed from the record. It is not only in reference to the intake capacity of each institution approved by the N.C.T. but subsequent judgment of Bench at Lucknow in the case of Sri Puram Prasad Gupta Memorial Degree College (supra). Total 8899 students appeared in the examination out of which 869 were those who appeared pursuant to the direction of the Bench at Lucknow. The result of the examination thereupon was declared for 8930 students. The declaration of excess result of 31 students was again pursuant to the direction of the Bench at Lucknow. As against it, the mark-sheets were issued in favour of 12472 students.

The fact aforesaid could not be disputed even by the counsel for the appellants other than to emphasize that S.I.T. did not take care of the judgment of the Bench at Lucknow in the case of Sri Puram Prasad Gupta Memorial Degree College (supra). The argument aforesaid has been raised without realising that the S.I.T. had taken figure of additional 869 students in excess to the admission otherwise given by the colleges. It was pursuant to the interim order and judgment of Bench at Lucknow. It was admitted by the counsel for the appellants that fraudulent mark-sheets have been issued but how it can be said to be to the appellants and not to the others. The argument aforesaid is relevant because nobody could dispute about declaration of result of the students in excess to admission as well as the appearance in the examination. It is therefore only the tabulation sheet/cross list produced by the University was not containing signatures of any authorized officer/person and additional pages were in different font. The question remains as to how the appellants alone can be said to have obtained fake mark-sheets out of those whose name appeared in tabulation sheet in excess to the students appeared in the examination. The determination of the aforesaid issue is not difficult in view of the fact that even while filing the writ petitions to question the order of termination, the appellants did not submit relevant documents to show their admission in any of the colleges with payment of fee apart from all other material to prove relevant facts as otherwise submitted by few appellants now namely-:

(i) Surendra Kumar S/o Sri Mauji Lal

(ii) Rajiv Singh Yadav S/o Sri Ram Ladait Yadav

(iii) Sudeep Kumar S/o Sri Ajay Pal Singh

(iv) Smt. Reeta Gautam D/o Sri Ram Gautam

(v) Reeta Yadav D/o Sri Janki Lal Yadav

(vi) Anuradha D/o Sri Rajendra Singh

(vii) Rekha Lavania D/o Sri Vijendra Singh

The documents aforesaid were submitted when Court asked the appellants to prove their case but other than few, none else could submit the documents rather if the documents in reference to Sarvesh Kumar Chaturvedi and Rajesh Kumar Chaturvedi S/o Sri Shankar Lal Chaturvedi, submitted by the Senior Counsel Sri Ashok Khare are perused, they are not of the nature submitted by other appellants named above. No material was submitted by the petitioners along with the writ petition to prove their admission in the college and appearance in the B.Ed. Examination, 2005. The documents submitted along with the writ petition were largely the mark-sheets and the degrees which have been considered to be fake. The majority of mark-sheets are not containing even the enrollment number. No reason has been given as to why other than 18 candidates, which includes candidates named above, did not file reply to the notice given by the University along with complete material if they were genuine candidates. The material was not submitted even in response to the notice given by the Basic Education Officer. It is otherwise a fact that name of the appellants did not find place in the marks foil.

The marks foil so recovered by the S.I.T. were called in the Court during the course of hearing even for perusal of counsel for the appellants. It was when they had shown their doubt about availability of the marks foil. The doubt was mainly raised by those counsel who have appeared for the students having the tampered mark-sheets. The original marks foil is material to show that appellants did not appear in the examination, thus are having fake mark-sheets. The marks foil was seen by the counsel for the appellants also. It is thus not correct to state that S.I.T. report alone was basis for passing termination order rather it is even the material collected during the course of investigation. There was no reason for the appellants not to produce relevant material while filing the writ petition to prove themselves to be genuine students.

Learned counsel for appellants further stated that the basis to dismiss the writ petitions by the learned Single Judge is the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University to cancel the degrees.

It is without a liberty to challenge the order. It is a fact that during the pendency of the writ petition, the University cancelled the degrees issued in favour of 2823 students who failed to submit reply along with material to prove their appearance in the examination after admission in any of the colleges. The impugned judgment however shows detail arguments of the appellants against the order dated 07.02.2020 and discussion of each issue thereupon. It is thus not correct to state that learned Single Judge did not allow challenge or arguments against the order dated 07.02.2020. Those candidates have challenged the order of termination without placing material to show their admission and appearance in the B.Ed. Examination 2005. The impugned judgment shows extensive arguments of the counsel for the appellants against the order dated 07.02.2020 without a formal challenge. The learned Single Judge has discussed all the arguments while passing the judgment.

The order dated 07.02.2020 is not based on the S.I.T. report alone. The University called for the information in its show cause notice. 2823 students failed to submit reply to notice and even failed to place any material along with the writ petitions to prove their admission in the college apart from appearance in the examination. The questionnaire given by the University through its notice is as under-:

[email protected]=k dk uke

[email protected]=k dk [email protected]=O;ogkj dk irk] eks0 uacj ,oa vk/kkj dkMZ uacj%

[email protected]=k ds firk dk uke%

izos'k ijh{kk dk vuqdzekad%

ftl egkfo|ky; esa izos'k fy;k mldk uke

izos'k dkmUlfyax vFkok izca/kdh; dksVs esa gqvk ¼LiLV mYys[k djsa½

dkmUlfyax la[;[email protected]/kdh; dksVs esa izos'k lwph esa LFkku ¼dkmUlfyax i= layXu djsa½

egkfo|ky; esa izos'k ds le; izos'k 'kqYd Mªk¶[email protected] tek djkus dk fooj.k

Mªk¶[email protected] la[;k [email protected]/kujkf'k----------fnukad ¼izek.k lfgr½

egkfo|ky; esa LdkWyjf'ki izkIr dh n'kk esa fooj.kA

Mªk¶[email protected] la[;k [email protected]/kujkf'k----------fnukad ¼izek.k lfgr½

ukekadu la[;k

eq[; ijh{kk ch0,M0 05 dk vuqdzekad

ch0,M0 o"kZ 2005 eq[; ijh{kk ds ijh{kk dsUnz dk uke

ch0,M0 o"kZ 2005 ijh{kk esa cSBus dk izos'k i= dh Nk;kizfr

ch0,M0 o"kZ 2005 dh ijh{kk esa lfEefyr gksus ds ckn vadrkfydk Lo;a izekf.kr dj layXu djsaA

;fn vLFkkbZ izek.k i= fo'ofo|ky; }kjk fuxZr fd;k x;k gks rks izek.k i=ksa dh la[;k leLr vLFkkbZ izek.ki=ksa dh Nk;k izfr layXu djsaA

ewy mikf/k dk fooj.k dzekad la[;k

vU; dksbZ [email protected]

^^uksV&% mijksDr ls lacaf/kr lHkh vfHkys[kksa dh Loizekf.kr izfr;[email protected] vfuok;Z #i ls layXu djsaA layXuksa dh la[;k vadksa esa ------------------------------- ¼'kCnksa esa½------------------------ lacaf/kr egkfo|ky; ds izkpk;Z }kjk vxzlkj.k&% izekf.kr fd;k tkrk gS fd [email protected]@dqekjh--------------------- [email protected]=h--------------------- fuoklh----------------------------- us egkfo|ky; esa o"kZ 2004&05 dkmUlfyax esustesaV ------------------------ ds varxZr fof/k lEer izosf'kr [email protected]=k [email protected] Jh --------------------- dks tks vadrkfydk fo'ofo|ky; }kjk tkjh dh x;h Fkh mlds -------- vad izkIr gq;s Fks rFkk lS)kfUrd esa ------------- Js.kh rFkk izk;ksfxd esa --------------- Js.kh FkkA

[email protected]=k ds gLrk{kj----------------- izkpk;Z

fnukad ----------------------- gLrk{kj ,oa eqgj^^

No explanation has been given for non-submission of information sought by the University along with material, if candidates appeared in the B.Ed. Examination, 2005. The information sought in the questionnaire was not such which would not have been available if a candidate took admission in the college and appeared in the examination.

It is also urged that appellants had appeared in the selection test and stood in the merit, thus could not have been terminated. Mere appearance in the selection test for the post of Assistant Teacher and qualifying it would not make the candidates eligible for the post having fake or tampered mark-sheets. In absence of valid B.Ed. degrees, they were not eligible for appointment as B.Ed. course is an essential qualification for appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher.

It is at this stage we are again considering the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University as few appellants have challenged the order aforesaid in these appeals. The order dated 07.02.2020 was passed by the University after issuance of show cause notice. It was not interfered by this Court in the case of Tilak Singh (supra). The notice was published in the news papers where a questionnaire was given to each of the candidates to answer it and submit reply along with supporting material. 2823 candidates did not submit any reply to the notice and accordingly they were declared to be holder of fake mark-sheets. The degrees as well as mark sheets were thus cancelled. The order dated 07.02.2020 has been questioned by the appellants without supplying any material even along with the appeal other than seven candidates named in the earlier paragraph. It is despite an opportunity by the University and even by the State.

It is more so when name of such students came during the course of investigation as no record for their appearance in examination was found. The marks foil recovered in the investigation were not containing their names. The cross list/tabulation sheet was observed to be manufactured documents by this Court in the case of Sunil Kumar (supra) as it was not containing signature of any authorized officer/person and it was having different font. In fact there were addition of pages in the tabulation sheet and thereby it was containing the result over and above those appeared in the examination. The University conducted the inquiry and it is on the recommendation of the Committee that the order dated 07.02.2020 was passed. Why the reply to questionnaire was not given by the appellants could not be explained if they are genuine students. It was not submitted even while filing the writ petition. It goes against the appellants whose degrees have been cancelled holding it to be fake.

In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the arguments for challenge to the order dated 07.02.2020. We are alive of the situation that few writ petitions have been separately instituted to question the order dated 07.02.2020 and are pending but it does not affect the right of others to challenge it in the appeal. The order dated 02.07.2020 came on record during the pendency of the writ petition and extensive arguments were made even before the learned Single Judge, who recorded finding on each argument. No error in the finding has been shown other than to state that appellants were not permitted to challenge the order dated 07.02.2020 though manifold arguments against the said order were made before the learned Single Judge. The argument of the appellants that learned Single Judge did not give opportunity to question the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University, thus cannot be accepted. The opportunity for it has otherwise been given by this Court in the appeal on the request of counsel for the appellants and otherwise arguments were even raised before the learned Single Judge also who has recorded its finding on each argument and has not been questioned. This virtually nullifies the argument of learned counsel for appellants to question the judgment in reference to the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University.

The University has already taken decision in regard to other 814 students also which includes 18 those students who filed detailed reply and submitted material to support it. The copy of the order dated 29.07.2020 in reference to 814 students was placed on record by Sri Ashok Khare, Senior Advocate along with written arguments. The direction of the learned Single Judge in regard to 814 candidates has been thus complied. They did not submit material along with the writ petition or the appeal for challenge to the order of termination other than few. It was submitted only by seven candidates pursuant to the direction in these appeals to show their admission in the college and appearance in the examination. The documents should have been filed otherwise for scrutiny by the State. The order dated 29.07.2020 has been kept in abeyance by the University pursuant to the interim order in these appeals. The interim orders are vacated; accordingly order would be revived.

The other argument of learned counsel for appellants is that the S.I.T. report is not final because a challenge to it has been made in the case of Sunil Kumar converted into a P.I.L. The argument aforesaid is of no relevance in view of the fact that this Court has passed a detailed judgment holding action of the respondents to be independent to the report. The material collected during the course of investigation has been used. There is no contest and denial regarding issuance of fake mark-sheets though it has been qualified as to how fake candidates can be appellants alone and not others. The argument aforesaid has already been dealt with by this Court. The S.I.T. report alone was not taken as a piece of evidence rather the material recovered by the S.I.T. is also basis for passing the order. Marks foil were otherwise perused by the counsel for the appellants on their request, as was called by this Court from the respondents. The name of fake candidates does not exist in the marks foil. In the majority of mark-sheets submitted by them does not even contain enrollment number. In view of the above, the appellants declared to be fake students should have produced material in their defence.

The impugned judgment of learned Single Judge is not otherwise based on the judgment of this Court in the case of Tilak Singh (supra). It is however a fact that issue about the competence of the officer/council, apart from other issues, adjudicated therein and attained finality in absence of further challenge, thus relied upon by the learned Single Judge. The issues settled therein are not open for challenge in these cases. The learned Single Judge was aware of the fact that judgment aforesaid was against the show cause notice.

The argument has also been made by the counsel for the appellants that result of B.Ed. Examination 2005 was declared on two occasions, one prior to the judgment in the case of Shri Puran Prasad Gupta Memorial Degree College (supra) dated 06.04.2007 and another subsequent to it. The S.I.T. has not taken note of the aforesaid. The argument aforesaid has been raised without taking into consideration that as against 82 institutions, how many students could have been admitted pursuant to the intake capacity given by the N.C.T. to those institutions with actual figure of students. The material recovered by the S.I.T. has made the picture clear. The figure of total students was taken with addition to the students pursuant to the judgment of Bench at Lucknow in the case of Sri Puram Prasad Gupta Memorial Degree College (supra).

Learned counsel for the appellants has failed to refer the interim order passed in the said case from time to time while challenging number of the students taken by the S.I.T. and even while doing so, they could not come out with a figure as to how many students appeared pursuant to the judgment of Bench at Lucknow. In fact the effort of the appellants is only to confuse the Court. The learned Additional Advocate General appeared for the State clarified the picture after referring to the material collected by the S.I.T. as to how many students appeared in the examination.

An argument has been raised even in reference to the marks foil. It contains marks of only two papers, thus could not have been relied by the S.I.T. and this Court. The marks foil recovered during the course of investigation were called for perusal of the Court as well as counsel for the appellants. It is true that marks foil of only two papers have been recovered but therein also marks appeared in the mark-sheets were found different than what has been recorded in the marks foil, prepared based on the marks allotted by the examiner. They were sufficient to prove tampering of mark sheets and even the number of the students appeared in the examination.

At this stage, another argument was raised that the name of those appeared in the marks foil is to be treated as genuine candidates. The argument for it was raised by the counsel appearing for the candidates having tampered mark-sheets. The argument aforesaid is accepted for tampered mark-sheets. The name of 2823+814 students does not exist in the marks foil which was even examined by the Court on random basis in the presence of counsel for the appellants. Two candidates out of 814 students appeared as ex-students, thus, they are excluded from the list of fake students. They are Km. Anita Maurya D/o Bhola Singh and Vijay Singh S/o Hari Singh. The case of seven candidates named in earlier paras needs to be considered separately for which necessary direction would be passed.

The counsel were invited to refer the name of any of the candidates whose mark-sheets/degree was declared to be fake. The name given by the counsel for the appellants were not found in the marks foil and it was perused not only for one institution but more than one on random basis. It is also that other than seven out of 814 students/candidates failed to produce any material to prove their appearance in the examination. In view of the above, their termination order are not interfered. The action of the State for 814 candidates is taken to be independent to the action of University. The learned Single Judge found that even mark-sheets produced by them do not contain enrollment number.

In view of the above, we do not find substance in any of the arguments raised on behalf of appellants/students whose mark-sheets/degrees were found to be fake and accordingly we do not find any reason to cause interference in the order of termination.

The issue now remains about the tampered mark-sheets. Learned counsel for appellants submits that University has yet to undertake exercise in reference to the tampered mark-sheets. Thus, the order of the learned Single Judge may be interfered. Whatever decision is taken by the University after applying the procedure given under Section 67 of the Act of 1973, the aforesaid would be acceptable to the appellants. Thus, their order of termination may be made subject to final outcome of the exercise yet to be taken by the University for tampered mark-sheets.

The counsel for University has raised no objection. The learned counsel for the State however made a contest. It is submitted that marks foil are sufficient to show tampering of mark-sheets.

It is however submitted that if any direction in reference to the request of the appellants is given, they should not be reinstated at this stage but their termination be made subject to final outcome of the exercise to be undertaken by the University.

In that case, issue regarding lessor marks in the tampered mark-sheets in few cases would also be considered by the University though so far as the State is concerned, they still support their the order of termination/cancellation of appointments as it is based on the material collected by the S.I.T. The marks folio show different marks than appeared in the mark-sheets. The tabulation sheets was also showing marks at variance to marks folio.

In view of the above, the respondent-State prayed to maintain order for termination of those involved in the tampering of mark-sheets. According to them, the fact about tampering gets established as one Sunil Kumar was issued two different mark-sheets containing different marks. It happened due to tampering of marks. The said Sunil Kumar then preferred the writ petition to challenge the issuance of two mark-sheets showing different marks. It is thereupon only the manipulation and malpractices played by the University came in the notice of the High Court. It is however admitted that the direction of the learned Single Judge in regards to tampered mark-sheets has not been challenged by the State.

In view of the above and as we find no error in the judgment to direct the University to proceed in the matter as per Section 67 of the Act of 1977 and making termination order subject to the outcome of the aforesaid, we accept the prayer of the appellants and for that to modify the direction only in regards to payment of salary of the intervening period.

In view of the above, we would pass appropriate order in the concluding paragraph for the tampering of mark-sheets.

No arguments in reference to the candidates given mark-sheets on one roll number has been made rather the appeal was filed by only those candidates who have been terminated holding their mark-sheets to be fake or tampered. Accordingly, limited to that extent, the judgment is rendered.

In the light of the discussion made above, we dispose of all these appeals with following directions substituting the judgment of learned Single Judge-:

(1) No interference is made in the order of termination/cancellation of appointment of those who obtained service based on fake mark-sheets other than those whose writ petition was allowed by the learned Single Judge. The direction aforesaid would apply not only to 2823 candidates whose mark-sheets/degrees were cancelled by the University by order dated 07.02.2020 but remaining 814 candidates also other than those excluded by the learned Single Judge and one Km. Anita Maurya D/o Bhola Singh of T.R.K. College, Aligarh and Vijay Singh S/o Hari Singh of K.R.T.T. College, Mathura. This direction would further exclude seven other candidates, viz. (i) Surendra Kumar S/o Sri Mauji Lal; (ii) Rajiv Singh Yadav S/o Sri Ram Ladait Yadav; (iii) Sudeep Kumar S/o Sri Ajay Pal Singh; (iv) Smt. Reeta Gautam D/o Sri Ram Gautam; (v) Reeta Yadav D/o Sri Janki Lal Yadav; (vi) Anuradha D/o Sri Rajendra Singh; (vii) Rekha Lavania D/o Sri Vijendra Singh. The respondent-State and University are directed to reconsider the case of above named seven candidates in the light of the documents submitted by them pursuant to the liberty given by this Court in these appeals. It would be in coordination. Necessary exercise in regard to those candidates would made within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order. If their admission in the college coupled with appearance in the examination is found proved, then the termination order would be recalled in reference to them. For a period of one month, those candidates would continue in service subject to outcome of the direction given above. List of 812 candidates out of 814 is enclosed as Schedule-I. Their order of termination of 812 candidates has been examined independently by the Court. It was not otherwise made dependent by the State to the order to be passed by the University for 814 candidates.

(2) So far as the challenge to the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University is concerned, no interference therein is made. Extensive arguments against the said order were made even before the learned Single Judge without a formal challenge to it but arguments so made were then dealt with by the learned Single Judge. The finding recorded therein does not suffer from error and even no argument to challenge the finding has been made other than to state that no opportunity was given to challenge the order dated 07.02.2020 ignoring that extensive arguments were made by the learned counsel. The finding in regard to it has been recorded by this Court also.

(3) The judgment of learned Single Judge is interfered in regard to the direction to the concerned District Basic Education Officer to effect the recovery of benefits obtained pursuant to the interim order of the Court. The liberty given by the learned Single Judge to the District Basic Education Officer for recovery is set aside.

(4) So far as the termination orders in reference to tampered mark-sheets are concerned, as urged by the learned counsel for the appellants, the University is directed to complete the exercise, as directed by the learned Single Judge, after observance of the provisions of law referred in the judgment and otherwise directed by this Court in the case of Tilak Singh (supra). The order in reference to those candidates would be made within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The order of termination/cancellation of appointments would be governed by the outcome of the order passed by the University, as agreed by the learned counsel for the appellants. If the University hold mark-sheets to be genuine instead of tampered of any of the appellants, the order of termination/cancellation of appointments, those would stand set aside. However, if the University records a finding about any of the candidates holding tampered mark-sheets, then the order of termination/cancellation of appointments would have effect but it would be from the date of the order passed by the University and accordingly for a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment by the University, the order of termination/cancellation of appointments of the candidates holding tampered mark-sheets is kept in abeyance. Those candidates would be allowed to work with payment of salary.

It is, however, made clear that in case any of the candidate fails to participate in the proceedings initiated by the University or delays it, this order would not be to their benefit and accordingly, the direction herein above would remain operative only for a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order by the University. On the expiry of the period given above, the order of termination/cancellation of appointments would become effective and thereby the University is directed to complete the exercise within the period given above. In case any candidate fails to cooperate with them, then a separate order for it can be passed but University would not, in any case, delay the process and for that no extension would be given by this Court rather default of the University to comply the direction aforesaid would have consequences of stoppage of salary of those who have to take action and to pass order in pursuance to the direction of this Court. The Vice Chancellor of the University would monitor compliance of this order and in case of delay, he would not be entitle to salary.

The University would be at liberty to make inspection of the marks folio lying with the Registrar, High Court or the S.I.T. for the purpose of verification, if so required and accordingly Registrar, High Court as well as S.I.T. is directed to cooperate with the University for it.

(5) The list of 2823 students has been enclosed along with the impugned judgment and list of remaining 812 candidates is enclosed as schedule I to this judgment.

All the appeals are disposed of with the aforesaid.

द्वारा:- माननीय सौरभ श्याम शमशेरी, न्यायमूर्ति

1. यह मेरा सौभाग्य है, की मुझे मेरे भ्राता न्यायमूर्ति श्री मुनीश्वर नाथ भंडारी द्वारा लिखा गया, एक अर्थपूर्ण व सारगर्भित निर्णय को पढ़ने का मौक़ा मिला। मैं उनके द्वारा प्रश्नगत विषय पर दिये गये तथ्यात्तमक व विधिक विश्लेषण, निष्कर्ष व निर्देशों से पूर्ण रुप से सहमत हूँ और केवल ''भारत वर्ष में गुरु की महत्ता' व ''छल का प्रभाव' पर पूरक निर्णय दे रहा हूँ:-

भारत वर्ष में गुरु की महत्ता

गुरुर्ब्रह्मा गुरुर्विष्णु र्गुरुर्देवो महेश्वरः|

गुरु साक्षात परब्रह्मा तस्मै श्रीगुरवे नमः||

(गुरु ही ब्रह्मा है, गुरु ही विष्णु है और गुरु ही भगवान शंकर है।

गुरु ही साक्षात परब्रह्म है, ऐसे गुरु को मैं प्रणाम करता हूं।)

2. भारतीय समाज में गुरु के उच्च स्थान की परिकल्पना उपरोक्त श्लोक से सर्वविदित होती है, जहाँ उसको भगवान की प्रतिमूर्ति माना जाता है। शिक्षक, ब्रह्मा के रूप में, ज्ञान और बुद्धिमत्ता का निर्माण करता है, विष्णु के रुप में, विद्वता का परिक्षण करता है तथा महेश्वर के रूप में अज्ञान का संहार करता है। कबीर दास जी गुरु को भगवान से भी ऊपर मानते है,जब वो कहते हैं :

"गुरु गोविन्द दोऊ खड़े,काके लागू पाय।

बलिहारी गुरु आपने, गोविन्द दियो बताय"।

3. शैक्षिक प्रक्रिया की सफलता, बहुत कुछ शिक्षक पर निर्भर करती है, क्योंकि यही वो शिक्षक हैं, जो छात्रों में उद्देश्य का प्रत्यारोपण और चरित्र का निर्माण करते हैं, इसलिए शिक्षकों की गुणवत्ता, योग्यता व चरित्र का शिक्षण प्रणाली की क्षमता के लिये सर्वाधिक महत्ता है, जिससे छात्र भविष्य में एक ज़िम्मेदार नागरिक बन सके।

4. शिक्षक का व्यवसाय एक पवित्र व्यवसाय है, यह केवल जीविका चलाने का साधन मात्र नहीं है। शिक्षक, राष्ट्र निर्माण में महत्वपूर्ण भूमिका निभाते हैं। यह शिक्षक ही है जो न केवल ज्ञान प्रदान करते हैं, वरन् भविष्य के नागरिकों को ऐसे साँचें में ढालते हैं, जिससे उनको दिल व दिमाग़ की विशेषताओं के अतिरिक्त, देश के प्रति कर्तव्य, नितिपरायणता और निष्ठा का भी बोध हो।

5. शिक्षक,माता पिता के बाद, 'गुरु देवो भव' की तरह सुशोभित होते हैं, क्योंकि वो बालक में सांस्कृतिक लोकाचार, बौद्धिक उत्कृष्टता व अनुशासित होने का भाव जागृति करने में मुख्य कारक होते हैं।

6. महर्षि अरविंद ने शिक्षकों के सम्बन्ध में कहा कि ''शिक्षक राष्ट्र की संस्कृति के चतुर माली होते हैं। वे संस्कारों की जड़ों में खाद देते हैं और अपने श्रम से सींचकर उन्हें शक्ति में निर्मित करते हैं।'' उनका मानना था कि किसी राष्ट्र के वास्तविक निर्माता उस देश के शिक्षक होते हैं। एक विकसित, समृद्ध एवम् हर्षित राष्ट्र व विश्व के निर्माण में शिक्षकों की भूमिका ही सबसे अधिक महत्वपूर्ण होती है। (देखें - अविनाश नागरा बनाम नवोदय विधालय समिति (१९९७) २ एस सी सी ५३४, सुष्मिता वासु व अन्य बनाम बैलीगुनजें शिक्षा समिति (२००६)७ एस सी सी ६८०, महाराष्ट्र राज्य बनाम विकास साहेबराव राउनदले (१९९२)४ एस सी सी ४३५)

''छल का प्रभाव'

7. वर्तमान प्रकरण के तथ्य व परिस्थितियाँ, उपरोक्त वर्णित शिक्षक की समाज में महत्ता से पूर्ण रुप से विपरीत है। तथ्यों की पुनरावृत्ति न करते हुए, यह विदित है कि विश्वविद्यालय व कॉलेजों के अधिकारियों, कर्मचारियों व अन्य ने अपीलार्थीयों को सदोष अभिलाभ पहुँचाने के उद्देश्य के लिए छल व कपट करके कुटरचित दस्तावेज़ों का निर्माण किया और इन्हें फ़र्ज़ी शिक्षा स्नातक की अंकतालिका व डिग्री प्रदान करायी गयी, जिसके आधार पर इन्होंने सहायक शिक्षक के पद पर नियुक्ति प्राप्त कर ली। यह विधि की अतिसामान्य अभिधारणा है, कि कोई ऐसा कृत्य जिसका आधार छल या कपट या धोखाधड़ी हो तो वो प्रारंभ से ही शुन्य माना जायेगा। अत: यह नियुक्ति आरम्भ से ही शून्य है।

8. अपीलार्थीयों ने छल व कपट से शिक्षक बनकर न केवल छात्रों के भविष्य से खिलवाड़ किया है, वरन् शिक्षक के सम्मान को ठेस भी पहुँचाई है। प्रकरण के तथ्यात्मक व विधिक विश्लेषण अपीलार्थीयों के प्रतिकूल है।

9. विधि की यह स्पष्ट व्यवस्था है कि 'धोखाधड़ी पवित्र कृत्य को भी निष्प्रभावी कर देती है' और 'धोखाधड़ी और न्याय कभी एक साथ नहीं रहते हैं।' दुवयपदेशन स्वयं में ही एक धोखा है ।

10. जब कोई व्यक्ति कूटरचित / जाली दस्तावेज़ों के आधार पर नियुक्ति प्राप्त करता है, तो वो कृत्य नियोक्ता के प्रति दुवयपदेशन व छल माना जायेगा और इसलिये, न तो उसके पक्ष में कोई न्यायसंगता उत्पन्न होगी और न ही नियोक्ता को विबंधन होगा, अगर बिना किसी जाँच के वो उसको सेवा से हटा दें और न हीं सेवा की अवधि की कोई प्रासंगिकता रहेगी । [देखें :- राम चन्द्र सिंह बनाम सावित्री देवी और अन्य, (२००३) ८ एस सी सी ३१९; जैनेन्दर सिंह बनाम उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य: (२०१२)८ एस सी सी ७४८; सुधाकर पाठक और अन्य बनाम उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य व एक अन्य, २०१९(१) ए.डी.जे. ५८९ (डी.बी.); बिहार राज्य व अन्य बनाम देवेन्द्र शर्मा 2019 एस सी सी ऑन लाइन एस सी 1360]

11. वर्तमान प्रकरण में जहां प्रारम्भ से ही छल, कपट व धोखाधड़ी के आधार पर पद प्राप्त किया हो, वो शिक्षक भविष्य में छात्रों को अच्छे संस्कार दे पायेंगे, इसकी संभावना नगण्य है। अपीलार्थीयों ने यह जानकारी होते हुए भी की उनकी डिग्री या अंकतालिका वास्तविक नहीं है और वो छल व कपट के द्वारा प्राप्त किया गया एक कुटरचित दस्तावेज है, उसको वास्तविक दस्तावेज के रुप में नियोक्ता को दे कर, पदनियोक्ति प्राप्त करी है, जैसा की पूर्व में उल्लेखित किया गया है, ऐसी नियुक्ति प्रारम्भ से ही शून्य मानी जायेगी। छल और धोखाधड़ी के आधार पर ली गयी नियुक्ति के कारण न केवल योग्य प्रत्यक्षी के अधिकार का हनन किया है वरन् आने वाली पीढ़ी के भविष्य पर भी कुठाराघात किया है।

12. इस न्यायालय के निर्देश पर गठित विशिष्ट अनुसंधान दल द्वारा दस्तावेज़ों व अन्य साक्ष्यों के आधार पर इस निष्कर्ष पर पहुँचना कि प्रकरण में बड़े स्तर पर धांधली हुई है तथा उन छात्रों को सूचीबद्ध करना जो फेक छात्र हैं, जिनकी अंकतालिका टैम्पर्ड या जिन्होंने प्रतिरुपण किया है, में कोई त्रुटि प्रतीत नहीं होती है, क्योंकि अपीलार्थी, विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा जारी करी गई प्रश्नावली के उत्तर के साथ, ऐसा कोई भी साक्ष्य न तो प्राधिकारी या न्यायालय के समक्ष प्रस्तुत कर पाये, जिससे उनकी डिग्री व अंकतालिका वास्तविक मानी जा सके। वर्तमान प्रकरण में नैसर्गिक न्याय के सिद्धान्तों का भी पूर्णतः परिपालन हुआ है, जबकि धोखाधड़ी के आधार पर नौकरी लेने वालों के प्रकरण में, इन सिद्धान्तों के परिपालन का अपवाद है। इस विशिष्ट अनुसंधान दल ने विश्वविद्यालय से वर्ष 2005 के शिक्षा स्नातक के संबंधित सभी उपलब्ध दस्तावेजों को एकत्र किया, उनका अध्ययन किया और सारणीबद्ध किया। सारणी के ध्यानपूर्वक परिशीलन से यह विदित होता है कि, यह सारणी विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा उपलब्ध दस्तावेज़ों के आधार पर, स्पष्ट रुप से शीर्षकों में विभक्त करके बनाई गयी है। ऐसा कोई कारण नहीं है, जिसके आधार पर विशेष अनुसंधान दल की रिपोर्ट पर संशय करा जा सके।

13. अत: अपीलार्थीयों को कोई भी राहत नहीं दी जा सकती है। मैं भ्राता न्यायमूर्ति द्वारा प्रश्नगत विषय पर दिये गये विधिक विश्लेषण, निष्कर्ष व निर्देशों से पूर्ण रुप से सहमत हूँ ।

Order Date-: 26.02.2021

Schedule-I

S. No.

ID

Roll No.

Name of Candidate

Father's Name

College Code

College Name

Recommendation

1.

F4

5027134

VANDANA

M. CHANDRA

AK COLLEGE, SIKOHABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

2.

F7

5027137

RAJESH KUMARI

BRIJ LAL

AK COLLEGE, SIKOHABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

3.

F10

5027140

MEENA KUMARI

KHOOB SINGH

AK COLLEGE, SIKOHABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

4.

F11

5027141

PRAMILA LODHI

RAI SINGH

AK COLLEGE, SIKOHABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

5.

F19

5027149

SURESH CHANDAR

KANHAIYA LAL

AK COLLEGE, SIKOHABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

6.

F23

5027153

DEVENDRA MANI

SELEM SINGH

AK COLLEGE, SIKOHABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

7.

F24

5027154

RAJESH YADAV

N.K. YADAV

AK COLLEGE, SIKOHABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

8.

F31

5027301

SANJAY PRATAP SINGH

LALLU SINGH

AK COLLEGE, SIKOHABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

9.

F35

5027305

MANOJ KUMAR

R. SINGH

AK COLLEGE, SIKOHABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

10.

F36

5027306

GURUPENDRA KASHYAP

RAM SANEHI LAL

AK COLLEGE, SIKOHABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

11.

F37

5027307

DIGAMBER SINGH

JAGDISH SINGH

AK COLLEGE, SIKOHABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

12.

F46

5280087

MANOJ KUMARI

GENDA LAL

APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

13.

F47

5280088

BHUP SINGH

PATI RAM

APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

14.

F48

5280089

VIJAY SHANKAR SUMAN

RAMDAS SUMAN

APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

15.

F57

5280117

ANIL KUMAR

RAM KHILARI

APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

16.

F58

5280118

VINITA PAL

HARI RAM PAL

APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

17.

F62

5280122

DEENDAYAL

MUNNA SINGH

APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

18.

F63

5280123

SANDIP YADAV

RANANJAY YADAV

APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

19.

F65

5280125

RUCHI SINGH

RAJENDRA SINGH

APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

20.

F66

5280126

MANGAL SINGH

SHIV DAYAL

APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

21.

F67

5280127

AKHILESH KUMAR

SIDDH NATH

APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

22.

F68

5280128

ALOOK RAJ VARSHNEY

A.K. VARSHNEY

APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

23.

F69

5280129

ANEK SINGH

SARNAM SINGH

APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

24.

F70

5280130

VIMAL PRATAP SINGH

K.S. YADAV

APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

25.

F74

5280134

KAUSHAL KISHOR

R.C. RATHORE

APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

26.

F78

5280138

PANKAJ MISHRA

C.P. MISHRA

APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

27.

F80

5280140

RAM NIRANJAN

SUMIRAM

APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

28.

F81

5280141

SANDIP KUMAR VARSHNEY

M.C. VARSHNEY

APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

29.

F83

5280143

SHYAM VIHARI

HARI SHANKAR

APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

30.

F84

5280144

SRI NIWAS SINGH

PURAN SINGH

APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

31.

F85

5280145

SUJIT SINGH

R.V. SINGH EIKARWAR

APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

32.

F86

5280146

VIJENDRA SINGH

SARNAM SINGH

APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

33.

F88

5280148

MANISH KUMAR

MAHAVIR SINGH

APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

34.

F92

5101087

SANDHYAYA YADAV

RAVINDRA YADAV

ACADEMY OF MGT. & EXCELLENCE, GAILANA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

35.

F93

5101088

VAVESH KUMAR

MALKHAN SINGH

ACADEMY OF MGT. & EXCELLENCE, GAILANA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

36.

F95

5101090

SATENDRA KUMAR

VIR PAL SINGH

ACADEMY OF MGT. & EXCELLENCE, GAILANA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

37.

F111

5101121

UPENDRA KUMAR

RAM SHANKAR

ACADEMY OF MGT. & EXCELLENCE, GAILANA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

38.

F112

5101122

NARENDRA KUMAR

AJAY PAL SINGH

ACADEMY OF MGT. & EXCELLENCE, GAILANA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

39.

F138

5101148

BRIJESH KUMAR

VIRENDRA SINGH YADAV

ACADEMY OF MGT. & EXCELLENCE, GAILANA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

40.

F142

5101303

KUNJ VIHARI VERMA

OM PRAKASH

ACADEMY OF MGT. & EXCELLENCE, GAILANA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

41.

F143

5101304

BRAJESH KUMAR

NATHU RAM

ACADEMY OF MGT. & EXCELLENCE, GAILANA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

42.

F144

5101305

SAVITA

RAM KHILARI SINGH

ACADEMY OF MGT. & EXCELLENCE, GAILANA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

43.

F148

5101309

SANTOSH KUMARI

GIRIRAJ PRASAD

ACADEMY OF MGT. & EXCELLENCE, GAILANA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

44.

F150

5101311

RENU PAL

MAHESH BABU PAL

ACADEMY OF MGT. & EXCELLENCE, GAILANA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

45.

F158

5116132

SANTOSH KUMAR

RAJENDRA PRASAD

ACMY INST OF MGT. & TECH., SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

46.

F164

5116138

BABITA

CHANDRA PAL

ACMY INST OF MGT. & TECH., SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

47.

F168

5116142

RAM RATAN

PREM CHAND

ACMY INST OF MGT. & TECH., SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

48.

F205

5116305

RAJ KUMARI

RAM KISHAN

ACMY INST OF MGT. & TECH., SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

49.

F209

5116309

DEEPENDRA SINGH

SATINDRA SINGH

ACMY INST OF MGT. & TECH., SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

50.

F211

5116311

POONAM RATHORE

RAM BARAN SINGH

ACMY INST OF MGT. & TECH., SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

51.

F214

5116314

KAILASH BABU

BABU LAL

ACMY INST OF MGT. & TECH., SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

52.

F215

5116315

PAWAN KUMAR

KRIPAL SINGH

ACMY INST OF MGT. & TECH., SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

53.

F220

5243074

SURENDRA KUMAR

MAUJI LAL

ADARSH KRISHNA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, BHOOP NAGAR, MAINPURI

Remain in the "Fake" Category

54.

F221

5243075

SANDEEP KUMAR

AJAY PAL SINGH

ADARSH KRISHNA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, BHOOP NAGAR, MAINPURI

Remain in the "Fake" Category

55.

F222

5243076

RAJ VIR SINGH YADAV

RAM YADAV

ADARSH KRISHNA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, BHOOP NAGAR, MAINPURI

Remain in the "Fake" Category

56.

F223

5243083

POONAM SHAKYA

R.P. SHAKYA

ADARSH KRISHNA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, BHOOP NAGAR, MAINPURI

Remain in the "Fake" Category

57.

F225

5243085

JAGVIR SINGH

SHIV SINGH

ADARSH KRISHNA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, BHOOP NAGAR, MAINPURI

Remain in the "Fake" Category

58.

F228

5243088

SATYA PRAKASH

RAMESHWAR DAYAL

ADARSH KRISHNA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, BHOOP NAGAR, MAINPURI

Remain in the "Fake" Category

59.

F229

5243089

RANVIR SINGH

ROSHAN SINGH

ADARSH KRISHNA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, BHOOP NAGAR, MAINPURI

Remain in the "Fake" Category

60.

F234

5243094

SUMAN

RAMESH CHANDRA

ADARSH KRISHNA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, BHOOP NAGAR, MAINPURI

Remain in the "Fake" Category

61.

F235

5243095

VINEET KUMAR BHARTI

MAHARAM SINGH

ADARSH KRISHNA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, BHOOP NAGAR, MAINPURI

Remain in the "Fake" Category

62.

F247

5232116

ARUN PRATAP

S. LAL

AGRA PUBLIC TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ARTONI, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

63.

F248

5232117

NARENDRA PAL SINGH

CHATURI SINGH

AGRA PUBLIC TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ARTONI, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

64.

F249

5232118

VINESH KUMAR

SHIV DAYAL

AGRA PUBLIC TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ARTONI, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

65.

F253

5232122

KAVITA

NARENDRA KUMAR

AGRA PUBLIC TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ARTONI, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

66.

F254

5232123

UJAGER SINGH

RAM SAHAYA

AGRA PUBLIC TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ARTONI, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

67.

F255

5232124

DHARMENDRA KUMAR KANSHANA

CHHATRA BHAN SINGH

AGRA PUBLIC TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ARTONI, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

68.

F260

5232129

RAJESH KUMAR

KHACHEROO LAL

AGRA PUBLIC TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ARTONI, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

69.

F261

5232130

OM PRAKASH BAGHEL

NARAYAN SINGH BAGHEL

AGRA PUBLIC TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ARTONI, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

70.

F264

5232133

KM. SARITA

VIDHYA RAM

AGRA PUBLIC TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ARTONI, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

71.

F265

5232134

RENU

RADHEY LAL VARUN

AGRA PUBLIC TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ARTONI, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

72.

F271

5232140

KAPTAN SINGH

DHARAM SINGH

AGRA PUBLIC TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ARTONI, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

73.

F273

5232142

SANDEEP KUMAR

RADHEY LAL

AGRA PUBLIC TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ARTONI, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

74.

F282

5279087

SACHIN GOYAL

MAHENDRA PAL GOYAL

ALIGARH TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

75.

F283

5279088

SWATI KASHYAP

RAM SANEHI LAL

ALIGARH TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

76.

F285

5279090

MANOJ KUMAR

LOKPAL SINGH

ALIGARH TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

77.

F294

5279118

SIMAN LATA

RAJENDRA PRASAD

ALIGARH TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

78.

F295

5279119

JITENDRA SINGH

BHARAT SINGH

ALIGARH TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

79.

F299

5279123

AVADESH VERMA

MUNSHI SINGH

ALIGARH TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

80.

F302

5279126

MANOJ BHUSHAN VARUN

ROSHAN LAL

ALIGARH TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

81.

F327

5172087

NARENDRA PRATAP

SHAB SINGH

AMARDEEP COLLEGE, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

82.

F328

5172088

DHARM PAL

BANI PAL

AMARDEEP COLLEGE, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

83.

F329

5172089

SUNIL KUMAR

ATAR SINGH

AMARDEEP COLLEGE, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

84.

F331

5172091

NARSH

DURGA PRASAD

AMARDEEP COLLEGE, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

85.

F333

5172093

ALOK YADAV

UMESH CHANDRA

AMARDEEP COLLEGE, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

86.

F340

5172308

BALWANT SINGH

CHARAN SINGH

AMARDEEP COLLEGE, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

87.

F344

5172312

NAVIN CHANDRA MAURYA

RAM ACHAL MAURYA

AMARDEEP COLLEGE, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

88.

F361

5281117

POOJA KANOJIA

M.C. KANOJIA

ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

89.

F362

5281118

BHUVNESHWAR SINGH

CHIRANJIT SINGH

ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

90.

F363

5281119

SURENDRA PRATAP SINGH

LATA SINGH

ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

91.

F364

5281120

VIRESH KUMAR

POKH PAL

ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

92.

F365

5281121

SURJEET KUMAR

MAHAVIR SINGH

ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

93.

F366

5281122

ALKA SINGH

PREM PAL SINGH

ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

94.

F368

5281124

YADVENDRA SINGH

NIHAL SINGH

ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

95.

F369

5281125

RISHI KUMAR

BANVARI LAL

ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

96.

F370

5281126

SATYA PRAKASH

FATEH SINGH

ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

97.

F384

5281140

SHALINI

SHANTI SWAROOP GUPTA

ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

98.

F397

5281303

RITU VARSHNEY

LAJPAT RAJ VARSHNEY

ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

99.

F399

5281305

MITHILESH

DEVI SINGH

ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

100.

F400

5281306

UMESH KUMAR

RAM BHAROSE

ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

101.

F407

5281313

VISHNU KUMAR

CHARAN DAS

ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

102.

F418

5131090

RAM VIR SINGH

JAI BAHADUR SINGH

ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

103.

F419

5131091

DHARMVIR SINGH

GANGA RAM SINGH

ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

104.

F426

5131116

YATIN NARAYAN

A.N. SHARMA

ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

105.

F429

5131119

HEMANT KUMAR

GUMANI RAM

ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

106.

F439

5131129

SADHNA KUMARI

SUMANT SINGH

ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

107.

F452

5131142

ANUJ KUMAR GAUTAM

SHIV CHARAN LAL GAUTAM

ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

108.

F454

5131144

SURENDRA PAL

SHRI RATI RAM

ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

109.

F455

5131145

OM VIR SINGH

LAL BAHADUR SINGH

ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

110.

F459

5131302

REKHA

MAHAVIR PRASAD

ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

111.

F461

5131304

VIKASH YADAV

RAJ VIR SINGH

ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

112.

F462

5131305

GYANENDRA KUMAR

BHOOP SINGH

ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

113.

F463

5131306

LAXMI CHANDRA

BRIJ LAL

ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

114.

F464

5131307

GUDDU KUMAR

BADRI PRASAD

ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

115.

F466

5131309

GOVIND KUMAR

S. RAM

ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

116.

F467

5131310

JITENDRA BAHADUR SINGH

J. SINGH

ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

117.

F473

5120131

HARISH KUMAR

PRAMOD KUMAR

ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

118.

F482

5120140

BHAWAN SINGH

MANIK CHANDRA

ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

119.

F495

5120226

SHASHI

MOHAR PAL SINGH

ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

120.

F497

5120228

UDAY VIR SINGH

JAI SINGH

ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

121.

F501

5120232

PREM LATA

H.S. SINGH

ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

122.

F502

5120233

SHASHI KALA

HODIL SINGH

ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

123.

F503

5120234

SUMIT VERMA

MADAN SINGH

ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

124.

F504

5120235

ANJANA RAJAK

B.L. RAJAK

ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

125.

F505

5120236

RENU

JAI SINGH

ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

126.

F507

5120238

ATUL SINGH BHADURIYA

LAKHAN SINGH

ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

127.

F523

5120305

RAKESH KUMAR

OM PRAKASH

ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

128.

F524

5120306

RATAN KUMAR

KAILASH CHANDRA MISHRA

ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

129.

F525

5120307

GHANSHYAM SINGH

JAGDISH SINGH

ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

130.

F528

5120310

ABHISHEK MATHUR

P.K. MATHUR

ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

131.

F534

5005304

MANJU

RAM NATH

B.D. JAIN GIRLS COLLEGE, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

132.

F536

5005306

MEENAKSHI

OMKAR SINGH

B.D. JAIN GIRLS COLLEGE, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

133.

F558

5017276

MADHU RANI

RAMESH CHANDRA

B.S.A COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

134.

F559

5017277

SHOBHA MISHRA

K.C. MISHRA

B.S.A COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

135.

F563

5017304

SANJU YADAV

RAM VEER SINGH YADAV

B.S.A COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

136.

F566

5017307

RAJEEV KUMAR

RAM SWAROOP SINGH

B.S.A COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

137.

F581

5234095

DHARMENDRA SHARMA

RAJEEV SHARMA

BALMUKUND BAJARI COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ARTONI, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

138.

F585

5234116

LATA THAKUR

MAHESH CHANDRA

BALMUKUND BAJARI COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ARTONI, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

139.

F586

5234117

SURENDRA PRATAP SINGH

JAI SINGH

BALMUKUND BAJARI COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ARTONI, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

140.

F591

5234122

SACHENDRA KUMAR

R.S. LAL

BALMUKUND BAJARI COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ARTONI, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

141.

F592

5234123

JYOTI SHARMA

B.P. PATHAK

BALMUKUND BAJARI COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ARTONI, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

142.

F607

5234138

ASHISH KUMAR MISHRA

RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA

BALMUKUND BAJARI COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ARTONI, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

143.

F615

5234146

CHANDRA PAL

KISHORI LAL

BALMUKUND BAJARI COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ARTONI, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

144.

F621

5134089

MITHILESH

HARI SINGH

BON MAHARAJ, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

145.

F626

5134094

KARM VIR SINGH

SHIV RAM SINGH

BON MAHARAJ, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

146.

F629

5134301

DEEPAK SINGH

AMAR SINGH

BON MAHARAJ, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

147.

F630

5134302

SHASHI PAL SINGH

GANPATI SINGH

BON MAHARAJ, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

148.

F640

5246089

MANJU YADAV

R.S. YADAV

BRAJ RAJ SINGH COLLEGE, KUBERPUR, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

149.

F644

5246093

GOPAL DUTT PANDEY

GAURI SHANKER PANDEY

BRAJ RAJ SINGH COLLEGE, KUBERPUR, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

150.

F650

5246118

ANITA

HARI KISHAN

BRAJ RAJ SINGH COLLEGE, KUBERPUR, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

151.

F654

5246122

SHIV KUMARI

DAYA RAM

BRAJ RAJ SINGH COLLEGE, KUBERPUR, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

152.

F655

5246123

MANJU CHAUDHARY

BUDDSEN CHAUDHARY

BRAJ RAJ SINGH COLLEGE, KUBERPUR, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

153.

F672

5246146

DINESH CHAND

RAM NARESH SINGH

BRAJ RAJ SINGH COLLEGE, KUBERPUR, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

154.

F688

5136096

ASHOK KUMAR

BHIKA RAM

C-IMPACT, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

155.

F699

5136305

GEETA YADAV

JANGI LAL YADAV

C-IMPACT, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

156.

F702

5136308

SHEN LATA

GYAN SINGH

C-IMPACT, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

157.

F705

5136311

MAN MOHAN CHITRAVANSHI

V.K. CHITRAVANSHI

C-IMPACT, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

158.

F707

5136313

PRAMILA SINGH

S.B. SINGH

C-IMPACT, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

159.

F713

5136320

REKH PAL SINGH

NAWAB SINGH

C-IMPACT, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

160.

F717

5008083

RAMVIR SINGH

INDRA PAL SINGH

D.S. COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

161.

F719

5008085

PREETI CHAURASIA

SURAJ NARAYAN CHAURASIA

D.S. COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

162.

F723

5008089

OM NARAYAN SINGH

HUB LAL

D.S. COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

163.

F725

8008091

UMA KANT YADAV

LAKHAN SINGH

D.S. COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

164.

F729

5008095

POONAM

SALIG RAM

D.S. COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

165.

F740

5008106

SUNITA

RAGHUNATH SINGH

D.S. COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

166.

F741

5008107

RAMKESH YADAV

SADARAM SINGH

D.S. COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

167.

F748

5008304

SANGITA VERMA

KISHOR KUMAR

D.S. COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

168.

F756

5030302

PRITI VERMA

AMAR SINGH VERMA

DAU DAYAL MAHILA VIDHYALAYA, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

169.

F757

5030303

JUGNU VERMA

UDAL SINGH VERMA

DAU DAYAL MAHILA VIDHYALAYA, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

170.

F760

5030306

PREETI SHARMA

R.N. SHARMA

DAU DAYAL MAHILA VIDHYALAYA, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

171.

F768

5275092

VED PRAKASH JAIN

UDAI RAM JAIN

DEV EDUCATION COLLEGE, BARAHEN, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

172.

F770

5216086

NEERAJ BHADAURIA

K.K. SINGH

DR. ISLAM MAZID TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

173.

F777

5216093

KHUSHI RAMA

LALA RAM

DR. ISLAM MAZID TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

174.

F778

5216094

JEEVAN LAL SENGAR

KAMAN SINGH

DR. ISLAM MAZID TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

175.

F780

5216096

SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA

H.P. SHARMA

DR. ISLAM MAZID TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

176.

F786

5216305

SATYAVIR SINGH

JAI PAL SINGH

DR. ISLAM MAZID TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

177.

F788

5216307

DHARMENDRA SINGH

ANEK SINGH

DR. ISLAM MAZID TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

178.

F789

5216308

MEENA KUMARI

JAI SINGH

DR. ISLAM MAZID TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

179.

F793

5126308A

NARESH KUMAR

RAJENDRA PRASAD

DR. ISLAM MAZID TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

180.

F797

5245092

HRADESH KUMAR

RAM PRAKASH SINGH

F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

181.

F798

5245093

SHWETA SINGH SIKARWAR

RAMESH KUMAR SINGH

F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

182.

F799

5245094

SATYA BEER

RAM RATAN

F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

183.

F802

5245116

SEEMA TOMAR

N.S. TOMAR

F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

184.

F803

5245117

DHEERAJ RATHORE

RAMESHWAR RATHORE

F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

185.

F804

5245118

PRITI RATHORE

RAMESHWAR RATHORE

F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

186.

F808

5245122

JAY DAYAL SINGH

KANCHAN SINGH

F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

187.

F810

5245124

NEERAJ KAUSHIK

G.C. KAUSHIK

F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

188.

F817

5245131

SHAIL BALA

GAJENDRA SINGH

F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

189.

F818

5245132

GAYATRI DEVI SAXENA

S. CHANDRA

F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

190.

F824

5245138

KALPANA

RAMPHER SINGH

F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

191.

F825

5245139

SEEMA

JAGDISH SINGH

F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

192.

F826

5245140

BAVITA

SATYAVEER SINGH

F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

193.

F830

5245144

RENU SHARMA

S.P. SINGH

F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

194.

F832

5245146

SUNIL KUMAR

SUBAY SINGH

F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

195.

F833

5245147

ROHIT MALIK

N. SINGH MALIK

F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

196.

F834

5245148

MANOJ KUMAR

BIPIN KUMAR

F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

197.

F840

5245154

HARI BHAN SINGH

KHEM SINGH

F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

198.

F863

5123067

SHAILENDRA KUMAR

CHATTAR SINGH

FAIYAZ HUSSAIN, NIDHOLI KALAYAN, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

199.

F890

5123304

ROSHAN ARA

F.M. KHAN

FAIYAZ HUSSAIN, NIDHOLI KALAYAN, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

200.

F893

5075031

BHOOPENDRA SINGH

SHER SINGH

FAIZ-E-ALAM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

201.

F903

5075041

MEERA

CHOTTE LAL YADAV

FAIZ-E-ALAM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

202.

F959

5075131

SEEMU

R.P. TIMORI

FAIZ-E-ALAM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

203.

F961

5075133

SARVESH kUMAR

RUSTAM SINGH

FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

204.

F962

5075134

HENA DEVI

RAJENDRA KUMAR

FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

205.

F963

5075135

NAND LAL SHARMA

P.S. SHARMA

FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

206.

F969

5075141

SUBODH KUMAR

SHRI KRISHAN LAL

FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

207.

F970

5075142

SANJAY DIWAKER

RAJ BAHADUR

FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

208.

F971

5075143

VIRENDRA SINGH

HARGYAN SINGH

FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

209.

F972

5075144

MANOJ KUMARI

PREM SINGH

FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

210.

F973

5075145

KRISHNA BIR SINGH

HARISHANDRA

FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

211.

F974

5075146

INDRAPAL SINGH

SURESH KUMAR

FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

212.

F975

5075147

GULVER SINGH

MAKHAN SINGH

FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

213.

F977

5075149

VARSHA RANI

MUNSHI SINGH

FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

214.

F984

5075306

RANJEET BHARTI

RAJ BAHADUR BHARTI

FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

215.

F987

5075309

DEVENDRA KUMAR SINGH

BHAGWATI PRASAD

FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

216.

F991

5075313

SOM DUTT

RAMJI LAL

FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

217.

F993

5075315

ARJUN SINGH SAVIDIYA

BABOO RAM

FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

218.

F994

5075316

SATISH KUMAR

MANIK SINGH

FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

219.

F996

5075318

HEMLATA

MANIK CHAND

FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

220.

F997

5075319

GYANENDRA SINGH

SHANTI SWAROP JADON

FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

221.

F998

5075320

CHANDRISH RANA

GURUDAYAL SINGH

FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

222.

F999

5075321

DINESH KUMAR

BABOO LAL

FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

223.

F1000

5075322

REENA KUMARI

RAJ KUMAR

FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

224.

F1002

5075324

KUSUM KASHYAP

PRATAP SINGH

FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

225.

F1015

5195116

BABLI

RAM SEWAK

GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

226.

F1017

5195118

AJAY KUMAR YADAV

GODHAN SINGH YADA

GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

227.

F1018

5195119

SUNIL KUMAR

RAM SEWAK YADAV

GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

228.

F1020

5195121

NAMRATA YADAV

KRISHNA VIR SINGH

GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

229.

F1021

5195122

BANDANA SHARMA

S.R.SHARMA

GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

230.

F1022

5195123

UMESH KUAMR

HAKIM SINGH

GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

231.

F1024

5195125

DHARMENDRA KUMAR

HARI OM VERMA

GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

232.

F1025

5195126

PRIYNKA ARUN

A.K.MAHESHWARI

GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

233.

F1028

5195129

SALINI

R. SINGH

GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

234.

F1032

5195133

RAM LAKHAN SINGH

ATAR SINGH

GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

235.

F1034

5195135

JASWANT SINGH

S.P. SINGH

GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

236.

F1035

5195136

SHRINESH KUMAR

INDRAJEET SINGH

GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

237.

F1036

5195137

SANDEEP KUMAR

HOTI LAL

GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

238.

F1037

5195138

BED PRAKASH

JAGDISH PRASAD

GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

239.

F1039

5195140

ARCHANA

MEVA RAM

GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

240.

F1040

5195141

ANJALI PARASHAR

K.P. PARASAR

GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

241.

F1042

5195143

RAM PRAKASH SISHODIYA

RADHEY SHYAM

GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

242.

F1043

5195144

YASHODA KUAMRI

HUKUM SINGH

GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

243.

F1044

5195145

SURESH CHAND

MOTI LAL

GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

244.

F1045

5195146

BHOOP SINGH

HAKIM SINGH

GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

245.

F1047

5195148

MUKUL KUMAR

LAXMI SINGH

GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

246.

F1048

5195149

VISHAL SINGH

AMAR SINGH

GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

247.

F1049

5195150

OM PRAKASH SINGH

FAGUNI SINGH

GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

248.

F1050

5014063

SADHANA

S.S.YADAV

GANJDUNDWARA COLLEGE, GANJDUNDWARA

Remain in the "Fake" category

249.

F1063

5014305

ZEENAT ARSHI

ABDUL MAZID

GANJDUNDWARA COLLEGE, GANJDUNDWARA

Remain in the "Fake" category

250.

F1065

5194087

MANOJ KUMAR

KUWAR PAL SINGH

GRAMODHAR MAHAVIDHYALA, NAGLA PARSI, DADU, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

251.

F1067

5194089

PRAVENDRA KUMAR

SHISHUPAL SINGH

GRAMODHAR MAHAVIDHYALA, NAGLA PARSI, DADU, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

252.

F1069

5194091

DINESH CHANDRA

RAM RATAN

GRAMODHAR MAHAVIDHYALA, NAGLA PARSI, DADU, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

253.

F1076

5086088

AKHILESH KUMAR SINGH

J.P. PATHAK

GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

254.

F1077

5086089

SUNITA DEVI

NEM SINGH

GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

255.

F1086

5086116

RANJANA SRIVASTAVA

R.S.SRIVASTAVA

GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

256.

F1089

5086119

VINOD KUMAR

MUNNA LAL

GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

257.

F1093

5086123

JAI PRAKASH

MAGH SINGH

GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

258.

F1094

5086124

DHARMENDRA KUAMR VERMA

MADAN LAL VERMA

GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

259.

F1095

5086125

NAM SINGH

LAL SINGH

GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

260.

F1096

5086126

SHALINI KULSHRESHTHA

P.K. KULSHRESHTA

GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

261.

F1097

5086127

GEETA

RAMVIR SINGH

GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

262.

F1098

5086128

SHAILJA SINGH

R.P.SINGH

GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

263.

F1099

5086129

SANGITA YADAV

D.S.YADAV

GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

264.

F1100

5086130

DHARMENDRA CHAUDHARY

HARDEV SINGH CHAUDHARY

GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

265.

F1104

5086134

AMIT YADAV

R.P.SINGH

GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

266.

F1105

5086135

BHAWANA YADAV

R.S.YADAV

GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

267.

F1107

5086137

SANGITA

MAHENDRA PAL SINGH

GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

268.

F1108

5086138

SUNITA KUMARI

JAGDISH SINGH

GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

269.

F1109

5086139

VIJENDRA SINGH

OM PRAKASH

GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

270.

F1110

5086140

OM PRABHA

KAMAL SINGH

GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

271.

F1111

5086141

ANIL KUMAR

RAM NIWAS

GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

272.

F1112

5086142

BABITA PANDEY

J.P. PANDEY

GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

273.

F1116

5086146

SHASHI WALA

DHANI RAM

GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

274.

F1117

5086147

HEMENDRA SINGH

SOHORAN SINGH

GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

275.

F1118

5086148

MAHESH KUMAR

SHIV VINOD KUMAR

GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

276.

F1120

5086150

SUSHMA

RAJENDRA KUMAR

GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

277.

F1121

5155089

PANKAL KUMAR

RAVINDRA KUMAR

IIMT, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

278.

F1130

5155118

BHARTI VERMA

A.K.VERMA

IIMT, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

279.

F1131

5155119

RAJINI

HUBBLAL

IIMT, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

280.

F1132

5155120

ANUJ KUMAR

SHIV CHARAN SINGH

IIMT, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

281.

F1137

5155125

MAMTA KUMARI

KHEM KARAN SINGH

IIMT, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

282.

F1138

5155126

ROHINI SINGH

VIJAY PAL SINGH

IIMT, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

283.

F1142

5155130

PRAMOD KUMAR

SOBRAN SINGH

IIMT, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

284.

F1144

5155132

PRAMILA FAUJDAR

G.S.FAUJDAR

IIMT, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

285.

F1149

5155137

YAVNESH KUMAR SINGH

A.K.SINGH

IIMT, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

286.

F1155

5155143

PUSHPENDRA KUMAR

SHIV NANDAN YADAV

IIMT, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

287.

F1163

5155302

PRAMOD KUMAR

RAM CHAND

IIMT, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

288.

F1164

5155303

GEETA

ML

IIMT, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

289.

F1165

5155304

PREM SINGH

ML

IIMT, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

290.

F1166

5155305

MEENAKSHI SINGH

RISHIPAL SINGH

IIMT, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

291.

F1167

5155306

CHANDRA PAL

KHYALI RAM

IIMT, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

292.

F1168

5155307

SUVARNA SINGH BAGHEL

C.B.SINGH BAGHEL

IIMT, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

293.

F1169

5155308

APARNA SINGH

C.B. SINGH

IIMT, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

294.

F1170

5155309

KAVITA KHAIR

AMAR SINGH

IIMT, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

295.

F1173

5155312

LOKESH BABU

MAKHAN SINGH

IIMT, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

296.

F1176

5155315

VIJENDRA KUMAR

BHEO DEV SINGH

IIMT, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

297.

F1181

5155320

NAVEEN KUMAR

RAJ KUMAR

IIMT, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

298.

F1183

5155322

ANITA

MAHARAJ SINGH

IIMT, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

299.

F1184

5155323

UPENDRA KUMAR

SHIVDAS SAGAR

IIMT, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

300.

F1185

5155324

JYOTI PATHAK

ASHOK KUMAR PATHAK

IIMT, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

301.

F1186

5155325

RITU VERMA

RADHEY SHYAM

IIMT, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" category

302.

F1187

5204086

KM. PANKAJ

INDER PAL SINGH

J.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" category

303.

F1191

5204090

VINEET KUMAR

RAM KRISHNA

J.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" category

304.

F1193

5204092

INDU PRABHA

YOGENDRA KUMAR

J.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" category

305.

F1194

5204093

YATENDRA KUMAR YADAV

JANAK SINGH YADAV

J.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" category

306.

F1195

5204094

RANU PONWAR

SHYAMVIR SINGH

J.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" category

307.

F1199

5204303

RANVEER SINGH

DAYA RAM

J.S COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

308.

F1200

5204304

SUBODH KUMAR

B.R. CHANDRODAY

J.S COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

309.

F1201

5204305

SUMAN KUMAR CHAUHAN

RAJVIR SINGH

J.S COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

310.

F1258

5265049

TIWARI SHAILESH

RAM SAHAY TIWARI

JAY MURTI COLLEGE, NAGLA, BALL, SIRSAGANJ, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

311.

F1268

5265059

RAJESH KUMAR

HAR DAYAL SINGH

JAY MURTI COLLEGE, NAGLA, BALL, SIRSAGANJ, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

312.

F1274

5265065

SATYAVIR SINGH

RANJEET SINGH

JAY MURTI COLLEGE, NAGLA, BALL, SIRSAGANJ, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

313.

F1278

5265069

UMESH BABU

BHIKAM SINGH

JAY MURTI COLLEGE, NAGLA, BALL, SIRSAGANJ, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

314.

F1290

5265081

YADUVIR SINGH

RAJVIR SINGH

JAY MURTI COLLEGE, NAGLA, BALL, SIRSAGANJ, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

315.

F1297

5265088

CHANDRA VIR SINGH CHHONKAR

GANPATI RAM

JAY MURTI COLLEGE, NAGLA, BALL, SIRSAGANJ, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

316.

F1355

5265149

SUBASH BABOO

GIRESH BABOO

JAY MURTI COLLEGE, NAGLA, BALL, SIRSAGANJ, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

317.

F1358

5019304

NEEL MANI SHARMA

D.S. PANDEY

K.R. GIRLS COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

318.

F1374

5129094

TARUN PRATAP SINGH CHAUHAN

RAM PRAKASH SINGH CHAUHAN

K.R. TEACHER TRAINING COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

319.

F1407

5129127

NARENDRA KUMAR

SUMAN SHYAM SINGH

K.R. TEACHER TRAINING COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

320.

F1433

5129305

AJAY KUMAR

ASHOK KUMAR

K.R. TEACHER TRAINING COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

321.

F1436

5129308

RAKSHA RAM

RAM LAL

K.R. TEACHER TRAINING COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

322.

F1437

5129309

DINESH KUMAR

RATAN SINGH

K.R. TEACHER TRAINING COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

323.

F1438

5129310

SUMAN LATA KUSHWAHA

HANUMAN KUSHWAHA

K.R. TEACHER TRAINING COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

324.

F1439

5129311

INDRISH KHAN

AHLKAR KHAN

K.R. TEACHER TRAINING COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

325.

F1440

5129312

RAKESH KUMAR BHAGEL

DEVI SINGH BHAGEL

K.R. TEACHER TRAINING COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

326.

F1458

5223018

JAYPAL SINGH KUNTAL

BHOMSAIN

KEHRIMAL GAUTAM SMARAK MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

327.

F1499

5223059

ARVIND KUMAR RANA

HARI SINGH RANA

KEHRIMAL GAUTAM SMARAK MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

328.

F1561

5223124

SATYA PAL SINGH

INDRAJEET SINGH

KEHRIMAL GAUTAM SMARAK MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

329.

F1588

5193085

ANKIT KUMAR

M.S. VERMA

KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

330.

F1590

5193087

SHASHI

RAM SANAHI

KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

331.

F1595

5193092

SWETA DAUNERIA

DAYA SHANKER DAUNERIA

KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

332.

F1603

5193117

SEEMA RAY

BRIJ KISHOR RAY

KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

333.

F1605

5193119

SUNEETA SHARMA

G.S. SHARMA

KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

334.

F1610

5193124

REKHA

DHARAM SINGH

KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

335.

F1612

5193126

MITHLESH KUMARI RAJPUT

RAM DAS RAJPUT

KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

336.

F1615

5193129

SARITA CHAURASIA

BHAGWAN DAS

KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

337.

F1616

5193130

ARCHANA

SURESH CHANDRA

KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

338.

F1621

5193135

NEELAM CHAUHAN

MAHIPAL SINGH

KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

339.

F1622

5193136

PROEETI MISHRA

A.K. MISHRA

KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

340.

G1623

5193137

SANGEETA DEVI

JAWAHER LAL SINGH

KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

341.

F1632

5193146

SUNITA SHAKYA

MUNNI LAL

KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

342.

F1633

5193147

MAMTA

GANGA SINGH

KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

343.

F1635

5193149

PUSHPA SRIVASTAVA

R.K. SRIVASTAVA

KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

344.

F1638

5024302

NEERAJ KUMARI

UMA SHANKAR SHANKALA

KR. R.C.M. COLLEGE, MAINPURI

Remain in the "Fake" Category

345.

F1645

5188088

PRATIBHA SARSWAT

R.B. SARSWAT

KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

346.

F1656

5188117

HITESH KUMAR SINGH

CHHTRA PAL SINGH

KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

347.

F1657

5188118

MANGAL SAIN

OMKAR SINGH

KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

348.

F1659

5188120

RAJESH KUMAR

SHRIPAL SINGH

KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

349.

F1660

5188121

VIJENDRA SINGH

NATRAPAL SINGH

KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

350.

F1662

5188123

VIJAY SINGH

RAM KHILARI

KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

351.

F1663

5188124

PUSHPENDRA SINGH

RAM DAS

KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

352.

F1668

5188129

SOHAN RANA

U.S. RANA

KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

353.

F1669

5188130

VIMAL SHARMA

R.P. SHARMA

KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

354.

F1672

5188130

SHIVA KANT TIWARI

R.P. TIWARI

KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

355.

F1674

5188135

SHASHI KALA

RAVI SHANKER MISHRA

KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

356.

F1679

5188140

MEENA KUMARI

M.I. SAGAR

KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

357.

F1691

5188303

MAHESH CHAND SHARMA

UMA SHANKAR SHARMA

KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

358.

F1692

5188304

RAVINDRA KUMAR VERMA

SUGREEV SINGH

KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

359.

F1694

5188306

SEEMA DEVI

BALBIR SINGH

KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

360.

F1696

5188308

ANJU YADAV

KAYAM SINGH

KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

361.

F1697

5188309

SEEMA YADAV

RAM KISHOR

KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

362.

F1700

5188312

ROHITASHWA KUMAR

VISHAMBHAR

KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

363.

F1714

5147116

NARESH KUMAR

KALI CHARAN

KRISHNA COLLEGE, BAMROLI KATARA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

364.

F1715

5147117

CHETAN ARYA

BHARAT SINGH VERMA

KRISHNA COLLEGE, BAMROLI KATARA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

365.

F1717

5147119

RAGINI SINGH

NATHI LAL

KRISHNA COLLEGE, BAMROLI KATARA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

366.

F1720

5147122

SAUBHAGY KANWAR

C.P. SINGH

KRISHNA COLLEGE, BAMROLI KATARA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

367.

F1725

5147122

SAUBHAGY KANWAR

C.P. SINGH

KRISHNA COLLEGE, BAMROLI KATARA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

368.

F1726

5147127

NEELAM KUMARI

JADISH CHANDRA

KRISHNA COLLEGE, BAMROLI KATARA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

369.

F1729

5147131

VIPIN SINGH YADAV

DILIP SINGH YADAV

KRISHNA COLLEGE, BAMROLI KATARA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

370.

F1746

5147148

SUSHIL SARSWAT

S.N. SARASWAT

KRISHNA COLLEGE, BAMROLI KATARA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

371.

F1751

5147304

SARSWATI

DIWALI LAL VERMA

KRISHNA COLLEGE, BAMROLI KATARA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

372.

F1752

5147305

SUMITA GAUTAM

R.C. GAUTAM

KRISHNA COLLEGE, BAMROLI KATARA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

373.

F1763

5147316

SATISH CHANDRA

BALVIR SINGH

KRISHNA COLLEGE, BAMROLI KATARA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

374.

F1769

5189088

SHYAM JEEVAN

CHHOTE LAL

M.D. COLLEGE, LAWERS COLONY, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

375.

F1771

5189090

ANGURI DEVI

JAY PAL SINGH

M.D. COLLEGE, LAWERS COLONY, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

376.

F1779

5189098

MUKEHS KUMAR

JAI SRI GOVIND

M.D. COLLEGE, LAWERS COLONY, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

377.

F1784

5189304

SHASHI KUMARI

BAL KISHAN

M.D. COLLEGE, LAWERS COLONY, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

378.

F1808

5126096

KUSHAL PAL SINGH

RAM SINGH

MEGH SINGH DEGREE COLLEGE, AVIDGARH, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

379.

F1836

5126141

CHANDRA PAL SINGH

NARAYAN SINGH

MEGH SINGH DEGREE COLLEGE, AVIDGARH, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

380.

F1846

5126301

LAXMI DUBEY

K.N. DUBEY

MEGH SINGH DEGREE COLLEGE, AVIDGARH, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

381.

F1847

5126302

VIMAL KUMAR

SAVRAM

MEGH SINGH DEGREE COLLEGE, AVIDGARH, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

382.

F1848

5126303

GOVIND KUMAR SHARMA

RAM JI LAL

MEGH SINGH DEGREE COLLEGE, AVIDGARH, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

383.

F1851

5126306

KAMAL NAYAN SINGH

TORAM SINGH

MEGH SINGH DEGREE COLLEGE, AVIDGARH, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

384.

F1865

5237086

NEELAM SHARMA

RAMESH CHANDRA SHARMA

MOTHER TERISA WOMEN COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

385.

F1875

5237118

RADHA SHARMA

OM PRAKASH SHARMA

MOTHER TERISA WOMEN COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

386.

F1877

5237120

REETA YADAV

RAGHUVIR SINGH YADAV

MOTHER TERISA WOMEN COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

387.

F1881

5237124

VANDANA SRIVASTAVA

R.S. SRIVASTAVA

MOTHER TERISA WOMEN COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

388.

F1882

5237125

REEKHA KUMARI

KHEM KARAN SINGH

MOTHER TERISA WOMEN COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

389.

F1885

5237128

MACHALESH

RAJA RAM

MOTHER TERISA WOMEN COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

390.

F1886

5237129

MOHAN DEVI

RAM SAROOP

MOTHER TERISA WOMEN COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

391.

F1887

5237130

REKHA KUMARI

MANIK CHAND

MOTHER TERISA WOMEN COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

392.

F1890

5237133

CHAMELI

DATA RAM

MOTHER TERISA WOMEN COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

393.

F1891

5237134

ANITA

HORI LAL

MOTHER TERISA WOMEN COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

394.

F1896

5237140

MEENA

BIHARI LAL

MOTHER TERISA WOMEN COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

395.

F1907

5011077

MAHESH

KHUBI RAM

P.C.BAGLA COLLEGE, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

396.

F1908

5011078

AJAY KUMAR SHARMA

C K SHARMA

P.C.BAGLA COLLEGE, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

397.

F1909

5011079

NEERU

VINOD KUMAR

P.C.BAGLA COLLEGE, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

398.

F1912

5011082

SANDHYA SAXENA

RAM SANEHI SAXENA

P.C.BAGLA COLLEGE, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

399.

F1913

5011083

MANOJ KUMAR

NEK RAM SINGH

P.C.BAGLA COLLEGE, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

400.

F1916

5011102

RAJESH

RAM DAS

P.C.BAGLA COLLEGE, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

401.

F1917

5011103

SANDHYA

MALKHAN SINGH

P.C.BAGLA COLLEGE, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

402.

F1919

5011105

RENU SHARMA

G.D. SHARMA

P.C.BAGLA COLLEGE, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

403.

F1923

5011109

ATIVEER

KAPTAN SINGH

P.C.BAGLA COLLEGE, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

404.

F1931

5011303

RAJESH VERMA

NARAYAN SINGH

P.C.BAGLA COLLEGE, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

405.

F1968

5146085

DHARMENDRA SINGH

GYANENDRA SINGH

R.B. DEGREE COLLEGE, NARAICH, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

406.

F1989

5146306

PANKAJ KUMAR

SATYA PRAKASH

R.B. DEGREE COLLEGE, NARAICH, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

407.

F1990

5146307

BALVEER SINGH

SAHAB SINGH

R.B. DEGREE COLLEGE, NARAICH, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

408.

F1991

5146308

ANITA

SARVAN SINGH

R.B. DEGREE COLLEGE, NARAICH, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

409.

F1993

5146310

RAJVIR SINGH

SURAJ PAL

R.B. DEGREE COLLEGE, NARAICH, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

410.

F1994

5146311

REETA

LAJJA RAM

R.B. DEGREE COLLEGE, NARAICH, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

411.

F1997

5002301

PRABHAT ARYA

S.C. ARYA

R.B.S. COLLEGE, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

412.

F2034

5145132

PRASHANT YADAV

PARMANAND YADAV

R.K. COLLEGE OF SYSTEM & MANAGEMENT, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" category

413.

F2038

5145136

ASHU

BHART SINGH

R.K. COLLEGE OF SYSTEM & MANAGEMENT, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" category

414.

F2052

5145303

RENU KATIYAR

S.C. KATIYAR

R.K. COLLEGE OF SYSTEM & MANAGEMENT, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" category

415.

F2057

5145308

DINESH KUMAR

HUKUM SINGH

R.K. COLLEGE OF SYSTEM & MANAGEMENT, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" category

416.

F2058

5145309

RISHI KUMAR

RAJVIR SINGH

R.K. COLLEGE OF SYSTEM & MANAGEMENT, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" category

417.

F2059

5145310

DHARMBIR SINGH

JAWAHAR SINGH

R.K. COLLEGE OF SYSTEM & MANAGEMENT, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" category

418.

F2063

5145314

PUSHPENDRA SINGH

NATHU SINGH

R.K. COLLEGE OF SYSTEM & MANAGEMENT, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" category

419.

F2066

5102251

ANAND KUMAR

VED RAM

R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

420.

F2067

5102252

AKHAND PRATAP SINGH

NATHU SINGH RATHORE

R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

421.

F2071

5102256

KARAN SINGH

BAL KUKAND

R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

422.

F2073

5102258

LOKENDRA VERMA

K.C. VERMA

R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

423.

F2074

5102259

SONU SHARMA

BHAGWATI PRASAD SHARMA

R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

424.

F2078

5102263

HARENDRA PAL SINGH

LAXMAN SINGH

R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

425.

F2081

5102266

MOHD. MUSTEEN

MOHD. IDRIS

R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

426.

F2082

5102267

SHIVENDRA SINGH

TEJ SINGH

R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

427.

F2084

5102269

RUPENDRA SINGH CHHONKAR

MAHAVIR SINGH CHONKAR

R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

428.

F2086

5102271

SHIVENDRA SINGH

TEJ SINGH

R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

429.

F2087

5102272

RUPENDRA SINGH CHHONKAR

KAPTAN SINGH

R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

430.

F2090

5102275

LAKENDRA KUMAR

RAMESH CHANDRA

R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

431.

F2094

5102279

SUBHASH CHAND

BHARAT SINGH

R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

432.

F2095

5102280

ANJALI

VISHNU NARAYAN

R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

433.

F2096

5102280

ANJALI

VISHNU NARAYAN

R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

434.

F2097

5102282

MAMTA SINGH

PORAN SINGH

R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

435.

F2100

5102285

DAKASH KUMARI BHARDWAJ

JAI PRAKASH BHARDWAJ

R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

436.

F2101

5102286

UMA KUMARI

JAGDISH PRASAD SHARMA

R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

437.

F2102

5102287

REKHA LAVANIA

VIJENDRA SINGH

R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

438.

F2103

5102288

ALPNA SHARMA

REEMESH CHANDRA SHARMA

R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

439.

F2107

5102292

MANOJ KUMAR SHARMA

CHANDRA PAL SHARMA

R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

440.

F2109

5102294

SHIV KUMAR YADAV

VIJAY PAL YADAV

R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

441.

F2111

5102296

DINESH KUMAR

DEVI CHARAN GUPTA

R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

442.

F2115

5102300

SARITA RANI

VIJENDRA SINGH

R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

443.

F2116

5207084

YOGESH KUMAR

DHARDHAR SHARMA

R.S.S. COLLEGE BALDEV, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

444.

F2119

5207087

MANORAMA YADAV

RAM PRAKASH YADAV

R.S.S. COLLEGE BALDEV, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

445.

F2121

5207089

RAVI CHAUHAN

KRISHNA AVATAR SINGH

R.S.S. COLLEGE BALDEV, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

446.

F2122

5207090

SUSHILA

AVAD NARAYAN

R.S.S. COLLEGE BALDEV, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

447.

F2124

5207092

DISHA VARSHNEY

DIPENDRA KUMARI

R.S.S. COLLEGE BALDEV, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

448.

F2129

5233087

MITHLESH

GYA PRASAD

RADHAKRISHAN KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

449.

F2135

5233118

SUMAN LATA

MEGH SINGH

RADHAKRISHAN KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

450.

F2137

5233120

REENA KUMARI

R.S.VARSHNEY

RADHAKRISHAN KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

451.

F2138

5233121

REENA INDAULIA

GORDHAN SINGH

RADHAKRISHAN KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

452.

F2139

5233122

SNEHLATA GAUTAM

R.A.GAUTAM

RADHAKRISHAN KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

453.

F2146

5233129

NEETU SINGH

GOPI CHAND

RADHAKRISHAN KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

454.

F2150

5233133

MANJU VIDYARTHI

R.C.VIDYARTHI

RADHAKRISHAN KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

455.

F2176

5222089

ANIL KUMAR

DWARIKA SINGH

RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

456.

F2179

5222092

SANJAY KUMAR

AJAB SINGH

RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

457.

F2190

5222122

RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

458.

F2199

5222131

ARVIND KUMAR

JAGDISH SINGH

RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

459.

F2200

5222132

RAKESH

BABU LAL

RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

460.

F2202

5222134

MANOJ KUMAR

HAMRAJ SINGH

RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

461.

F2203

5222135

ANIL KUMAR

KESHAV DEV

RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

462.

F2204

5222136

TARUN KUMAR

SURESH CHAND

RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

463.

F2205

5222137

SUBHASH CHANDRA

KHACHER MAL

RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

464.

F2215

5222147

RAVI PRAKASH

MATADIN

RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

465.

F2221

5222223

KUMMED BABU

RAM SEWAK

RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

466.

F2232

5222234

ASLAM

MOHD RAFEEK

RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

467.

F2239

5222241

NIHAL SINGH

TETRA PAL SINGH

RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

468.

F2262

5277120

ANIL YADAV

TARA CHAND YADAV

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

469.

F2264

5277122

MONIKA RAJPUT

C.M.RAJPUR

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

470.

F2265

5277123

VIJAY KUMARI

MAHENDRA PAL SINGH

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

471.

F2266

5277124

DHRAM VEER SHARMA

SITA RAM SHARMA

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

472.

F2267

5277125

VINOD KUMAR SINGH

VIRENDRA SINGH

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

473.

F2270

5277128

MOHAN LAL SHARMA

SEWA LAL SHARMA

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

474.

F2274

5277132

SUBHANA PARVEEN

ISLAM MUDDIN

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

475.

F2293

5277301

SANJAY KUMAR

PRATAP SINGH

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

476.

F2294

5277302

HAMBIR SINGH

P.S.SHIKAWAR

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

477.

F2296

5277304

NEEROO

AJAY VEER SINGH

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

478.

F2297

5277305

KAMAL SINGH

CHANDRA PAL SINGH

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

479.

F2305

5277313

KALPANA MAURYA

JAI PRAKASH MAURYA

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

480.

F2307

5104084

PREM SINGH

RAJENDRA SINGH

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

481.

F2309

5104086

KALPANA MISHRA

K.C.MISHRA

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

482.

F2323

5104121

REENA

MAHENDRA PAL SINGH

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

483.

F2324

5104122

ASHISH PAL GANGWAR

DRAGPAL SIINGH GANGWAR

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

484.

F2325

5104123

SAVITA PAL SINGH

MAHESH CHAND BAGHEL

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

485.

F2327

5104125

JODHAN SINGH

HARDAN SINGH

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

486.

F2328

5104126

SUNIL KUMAR

P.D. YADAV

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

487.

F2330

5104128

AMIT SINGH

SANJAY SINGH

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

488.

F2331

5104129

HEMANT KUMAR SARASWAT

KESHAV DEV

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

489.

F2333

5104131

HARENDRA SINGH

LOKMAN SINGH

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

490.

F2336

5104134

RAGHUVENDRA PRATAP SINGH

R.B.SINGH

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

491.

F2337

5104135

VANDANA

SUDHIR KUMAR

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

492.

F2338

5104136

BHOOP SINGH

BEHERI LAL

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

493.

F2339

5104137

PREM CHANDRA

OM PRKASH

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

494.

F2343

5104141

VIRENDRA PRATAP MISHRA

MAHENDRA PAL

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

495.

F2346

5104144

SUBODH KUMAR

YOGESH KUMAR

RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

496.

F2368

5185124

SADHANA SINGH

D.P. SINGH

RAMESHWARI DEVI KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, PATHOLI, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

497.

F2392

5185148

MANJU RANI KUSHWAHA

NATHU SINGH KUSHWAHA

RAMESHWARI DEVI KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, PATHOLI, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

498.

F2394

5185150

MAYA PRAKASH

CHANDRA PAL SINGH

RAMESHWARI DEVI KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, PATHOLI, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

499.

F2396

5210082

SACHIN

R.K.GUPTA

S.M.DEGREE COLLEGE, PALI DUNGRA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

500.

F2397

5210083

OMVEER SINGH

SOVRAN SINGH

S.M.DEGREE COLLEGE, PALI DUNGRA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

501.

F2401

5210087

MANJU TOMAR

RAM NIWAS TOMAR

S.M.DEGREE COLLEGE, PALI DUNGRA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

502.

F2402

5210088

JATIPAL SINGH

HARVIR SINGH

S.M. DEGREE COLLEGE PALI DUNGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

503.

F2403

5210089

RAM BAHADUR SINGH

SAGAR SINGH

S.M. DEGREE COLLEGE PALI DUNGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

504.

F2404

5210090

SEEMA YADAV

V.S. YADAV

S.M. DEGREE COLLEGE PALI DUNGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

505.

F2420

5210160

SURENDRA PAL SINGH

RAM SAHAY

S.M. DEGREE COLLEGE PALI DUNGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

506.

F2421

5007087

SNEH LATA

R.C. CHAUHAN

S.R.K. COLLEGE, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

507.

F2422

5007088

BIJENDRA SINGH

RAM DAS

S.R.K. COLLEGE, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

508.

F2423

5007089

KASHMIRI

SON PAL

S.R.K. COLLEGE, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

509.

F2424

5007090

SUSHIL KUMAR

RAM CHARAN LAL

S.R.K. COLLEGE, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

510.

F2428

5007094

RAJESH KUMAR

DULI CHAND

S.R.K. COLLEGE, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

511.

F2435

5007116

JITENDRA SINGH CHANDEL

UDAY VIR SINGH CHANDEL

S.R.K. COLLEGE, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

512.

F2437

5007304

HARIYENDRA KUMAR

MAHENDRA PAL SINGH

S.R.K. COLLEGE, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

513.

F2438

5007305

SANDEEP KUMAR CHETAN

BACHCHU SINGH

S.R.K. COLLEGE, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

514.

F2439

5007306

SATENDRA KUMAR

RAMHARI SHARMA

S.R.K. COLLEGE, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

515.

F2445

5007312

HARVENDRA KUMAR

GYAN SINGH

S.R.K. COLLEGE, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

516.

F2480

5650085

BRAJ RAJ SINGH

HAKIM SINGH

S.S. COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

517.

F2487

5009112

RAJEEV KUMAR

SHIV RAJ SINGH

S.V. COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

518.

F2490

5009115

ARCHANA SAGAR

R.K. SAGAR

S.V. COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

519.

F2491

5009116

HARI PRASAD

GAJJRAJ SINGH

S.V. COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

520.

F2492

5009303

YOGENDRA SINGH

RAMVIR SINGH

S.V. COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

521.

F2497

5009308

NEELIMA JADON

KAMAL SINGH JADON

S.V. COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

522.

F2499

5009310

VIVEK KUMAR

MALKHAN SINGH

S.V. COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

523.

F2500

5009311

HEMA RANI

KISHAN CHAND

S.V. COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

524.

F2511

5231091

MANJU RANI

PHOOL SINGH

SANT RAMKRISHAN KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, BALKESWAR, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

525.

F2512

5231092

SUSHMA KUMARI

PRITAM ISNGH

SANT RAMKRISHAN KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, BALKESWAR, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

526.

F2515

5074054

JAGAT SINGH

MAHANAND SINGH

SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

527.

F2518

5074057

ABHISHEK KUMAR

SHIV SINGH

SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

528.

F2523

5074062

PUNEET KUMAR SINGH

MAHAVIR SINGH

SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

529.

F2527

5074066

UDAI PRATAP SINGH

CHHOTEY SINGH

SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

530.

F2529

5074068

SURESH KUMAR MALANI

SAVAL DAS

SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

531.

F2539

5074078

ADITYA KUMARI

GANGA SINGH

SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

532.

F2541

5074080

KALPANA

NAURANGI LAL

SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

533.

F2547

5074086

VIMLESH

RAM BHAROSE LAL

SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

534.

F2562

5074110

CHANDRA BAN SINGH

KHAZAN SINGH

SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

535.

F2564

5074112

SALINI

OM PRATAP SINGH

SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

536.

F2565

5074113

REKHA KUMARI

MUNNA LAL YADAV

SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

537.

F2566

5074114

CHANDRA MOHAN SHARMA

KHEM CHAND SHARMA

SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

538.

F2567

5074115

RAVI SHANKER

KASHI RAM

SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

539.

F2580

5074128

JAYAMALA KUSHWAHA

ASHOK KUMAR

SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

540.

F2619

5221117

SUSHMA RANI

RAJ PAL SINGH

SHANTINIKETAN COLLEGE, TEHRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

541.

F2620

5221118

RAJESH BHASKER

R.N. BHASKER

SHANTINIKETAN COLLEGE, TEHRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

542.

F2622

5221120

SATISH CHANDRA YADAV

SURENDRA SINGH YADAV

SHANTINIKETAN COLLEGE, TEHRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

543.

F2658

5221306

VISHAMBAR SINGH

DURG SINGH

SHANTINIKETAN COLLEGE, TEHRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

544.

F2659

5221307

RAM PRASAD SONKAR

FAUHDAR SONKER

SHANTINIKETAN COLLEGE, TEHRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

545.

F2666

5221314

SHASHI PRABHA MATHUR

NATHU RAM MATHUR

SHANTINIKETAN COLLEGE, TEHRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

546.

F2667

5221315

SHUSHILA

BISHAMBHAR DAYAL

SHANTINIKETAN COLLEGE, TEHRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

547.

F2669

5221317

RAJESH SAGAR

BABU LAL SAGAR

SHANTINIKETAN COLLEGE, TEHRA, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

548.

F2672

5087085

PUNIT KUMARI

LAL SINGH

SHIVDAN SINGH INSTITUTE OF MGMT. & TECH., ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

549.

F2673

5087086

SUDHIR KUMAR

CHANDRA SINGH

SHIVDAN SINGH INSTITUTE OF MGMT. & TECH., ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

550.

F2675

5087088

NISHAN SINGH

SOHAN LAL

SHIVDAN SINGH INSTITUTE OF MGMT. & TECH., ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

551.

F2677

5087090

SHAKUNTALA

MAN SINGH

SHIVDAN SINGH INSTITUTE OF MGMT. & TECH., ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

552.

F2686

5087118

SANGRAM SINGH

RAGHUVIR SINGH

SHIVDAN SINGH INSTITUTE OF MGMT. & TECH., ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

553.

F2687

5087119

VIBY

DAHARMPAL SINGH TOMAR

SHIVDAN SINGH INSTITUTE OF MGMT. & TECH., ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

554.

F2690

5087122

MITHLESH KUMARI

CHUNILAL

SHIVDAN SINGH INSTITUTE OF MGMT. & TECH., ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

555.

F2703

5087135

PRADEEP KUMAR YADAV

DEVENDRA KUMAR YADAV

SHIVDAN SINGH INSTITUTE OF MGMT. & TECH., ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

556.

F2709

5087141

NUTAN KUMARI

JAGDISH PRASAD SAHA

SHIVDAN SINGH INSTITUTE OF MGMT. & TECH., ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

557.

F2715

5087147

KOMAL SINGH

RAM LAL

SHIVDAN SINGH INSTITUTE OF MGMT. & TECH., ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

558.

F2728

5079301

BRAJESH KUMARI

SAHAB SINGH

SHIVDAN SINGH SMRITI COLLEGE, IGLAS, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

559.

F2729

5079302

RAJ KUMARI

BRIJENDRA SINGH

SHIVDAN SINGH SMRITI COLLEGE, IGLAS, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

560.

F2730

5079303

JAYCHANDRA SINGH

HAMIR PAL SINGH

SHIVDAN SINGH SMRITI COLLEGE, IGLAS, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

561.

F2735

5079308

NIRAJA DIXIT

K.M. DIXIT

SHIVDAN SINGH SMRITI COLLEGE, IGLAS, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

562.

F2745

5079318

RADHA RANI

MANIK CHAND

SHIVDAN SINGH SMRITI COLLEGE, IGLAS, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

563.

F2746

5079319

LAXMINARAYAN VARSHNEY

JAGDISH PRASAD VARSHNEY

SHIVDAN SINGH SMRITI COLLEGE, IGLAS, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

564.

F2747

5079320

VIKASH SARASWAT

AVNISH CHANDRA SARASWAT

SHIVDAN SINGH SMRITI COLLEGE, IGLAS, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

565.

F2749

5212087

DHARMENDRA KUMAR

HORI LAL

SHRI JEE BABA COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

566.

F2754

5212092

SHASHI BHUSHAN

MOHAN LAL

SHRI JEE BABA COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

567.

F2770

5149116

PREM SINGH

BABU LAL

SHRI KRISHAN YOGIRAJ MAHAVIDHYALA, RATIBHANPUR, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

568.

F2771

5149117

MAMTA CHAUDHARY

GOVIND SINGH FAUJDAR

SHRI KRISHAN YOGIRAJ MAHAVIDHYALA, RATIBHANPUR, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

569.

F2773

5149119

SUNIL KUMAR

AZAD SINGH

SHRI KRISHAN YOGIRAJ MAHAVIDHYALA, RATIBHANPUR, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

570.

F2774

5149120

ANIL KUMAR

JAGJIT SINGH

SHRI KRISHAN YOGIRAJ MAHAVIDHYALA, RATIBHANPUR, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

571.

F2775

5149121

LALITA YADAV

JAYPAL YADAV

SHRI KRISHAN YOGIRAJ MAHAVIDHYALA, RATIBHANPUR, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

572.

F2777

5149123

SHELENDRA SINGH

BRAJESH TOMAR

SHRI KRISHAN YOGIRAJ MAHAVIDHYALA, RATIBHANPUR, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

573.

F2805

5149302

ALDRIL

MURARI LAL

SHRI KRISHAN YOGIRAJ MAHAVIDHYALA, RATIBHANPUR, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

574.

F2808

5149305

SANTOSH KUMAR

SURESH CHANDRA

SHRI KRISHAN YOGIRAJ MAHAVIDHYALA, RATIBHANPUR, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

575.

F2810

5149307

PRIYANKA

RAJN PAL SINGH

SHRI KRISHAN YOGIRAJ MAHAVIDHYALA, RATIBHANPUR, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

576.

F2812

5149309

RAJESH KUMAR

MAN SINGH

SHRI KRISHAN YOGIRAJ MAHAVIDHYALA, RATIBHANPUR, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

577.

F2815

5149312

SURENDRA SINGH

MANGELAL

SHRI KRISHAN YOGIRAJ MAHAVIDHYALA, RATIBHANPUR, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

578.

F2820

5225086

MAMTA YADAV

M.L. YADAV

SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

579.

F2821

5225087

LAKHAN SINGH

BHAGWAN SINGH

SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

580.

F2822

5225088

DIVAKER GUPTA

SATISH CHANDRA GUPTA

SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

581.

F2831

5225118

MANOJ KUMAR

RAJENDRA SINGH

SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

582.

F2833

5225120

SAURABH BISHNOI

N.K. BISHNOI

SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

583.

F2836

5225123

ANOOP KUMAR

KISHOR KUMAR

SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

584.

F2839

5225126

SANTOSH KUMAR

MAHAVIR SINGH

SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

585.

F2840

522127

SHASHI KANT MOURYA

RAJARAM MOURYA

SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

586.

F2842

5225129

SUNITA TRIVEDI

K.N. TRIVEDI

SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

587.

F2843

5225130

ALOK GOEL

MAHENDRA PAL GOEL

SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

588.

F2844

5225131

NABAB SINGH

SUBEDAR SINGH

SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

589.

F2846

5225133

MAHESH CHANDRA

RAM SANEHI

SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

590.

F2847

5225134

MANOJ SINGH

MOHAN SINGH

SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

591.

F2848

5225135

SHESH CHANDRA

ISHWAR DAYAL

SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

592.

F2849

522136

VIRENDRA SINGH

****** SINGH

SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

593.

F2850

522137

DALVEER SINGH

BASDEV SINGH

SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

594.

F2852

522139

MANISH KUMAR SINGH YADAV

SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH

SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

595.

F2855

522142

JYOTI

S.P. KHAIR

SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

596.

F2857

522144

NEELAM

OM PRAKASH SINGH

SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

597.

F2858

5225145

KAVITA JADON

OM PRAKASH JADON

SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

598.

F2861

5225148

REKHA YADAV

K.V. SINGH

SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

599.

F2863

5225150

MONA GUPTA

GOPAL GUPTA

SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

600.

F2870

5239092

SADHNA SIKARWAR

GULAB SINGH SIKARBAR

SIR M.U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

601.

F2887

5239126

GUDDI

RAM SHYAM VERMA

SIR M.U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

602.

F2888

5239127

REKHA RANI

RATAN KUMAR

SIR M.U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

603.

F2890

5239129

GYANENDRA KUMAR

BHUP SINGH

SIR M.U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

604.

F2891

5239130

MEENA KUMARI

MAHENDRA PAL SINGH

SIR M.U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

605.

F2894

5239133

SUNITA

CHANDRA BHAN

SIR M.U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

606.

F2895

5239134

MITHLESH KUMARI

RAM SINGH ARYA

SIR M.U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

607.

F2896

5239135

GULAN SINGH

RAM SINGH ARYA

SIR M.U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

608.

F2897

5239136

RASHMI VERMA

R. K. VERMA

SIR M. U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

609.

F2899

5239138

PUSH LATA

MAHVIR SINGH

SIR M. U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

610.

F2900

5239139

DEVENDRA SHARMA

BHIMSEN SHARMA

SIR M. U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

611.

F2901

5239140

MOHD. KALEEM KHAN

MOHD MANSHUR KHAN

SIR M. U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

612.

F2904

5239143

KUNWAR SINGH

RAGHUVIR SINGH

SIR M. U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

613.

F2907

5239146

SONIA SINGH

JAGDISH PRASAD

SIR M. U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

614.

F2908

5239147

BABLU

RAM AVATAR

SIR M. U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

615.

F2909

5239148

NIRMALA

RAM DAS

SIR M. U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

616.

F2911

5239150

ANJANA

AJAYVIR SINGH

SIR M. U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

617.

F2912

5239208

KAILASH

RANCHOR SINGH

SIR M. U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

618.

F2913

5201083

DEEPA

MAHARAJ SINGH

SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" category

619.

F2914

5201084

POONAM KUMARI

NATHUR RAM

SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" category

620.

F2917

5201087

SURVATI

NATTHU SINGH

SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" category

621.

F2918

5201088

PREM PAL SINGH

SUNDER LAL

SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" category

622.

F2925

5201116

ANIL KUMAR SINGH

SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH

SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" category

623.

F2926

5201117

PRAVEEN KUMAR UPADHYAY

M.S. SHARMA

SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" category

624.

F2927

5201118

MAHESH CHANDRA

RAM NATH SINGH

SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" category

625.

F2929

5201120

SURBHI YADAV

SATISH KUMAR YADAV

SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" category

626.

F2930

5201121

DEVENDRA SINGH

KUMAR PAL SINGH

SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" category

627.

F2932

5201123

SUSHIL KUMAR

GYAN PRASAD

SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" category

628.

F2938

5201129

NARENDRA KUMAR

R.C. VERMA

SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" category

629.

F2939

5201130

CHANDRA PRAKASH YADAV

DEVAN SINGH YADAV

SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" category

630.

F2943

5201134

ANIL KUMAR

BHAN LAL GUPTA

SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" category

631.

F2945

5201136

SUNIL KUAMR YADAV

AKBAR SINGH YADAV

SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" category

632.

F2946

5201137

MANOJ KUMAR

S.L. VERMA

SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" category

633.

F2947

5201138

MANOJ KUMAR

KANCHI LAL

SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" category

634.

F2948

5201139

BHUVNESHWAR PRAKASH SINGH

NARENDA KUMAR

SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" category

635.

F2949

5201140

ARCHANA KUMAR

SUKHRAM SINGH

SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" category

636.

F2956

5201147

OM HARI

K.P. SINGH

SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" category

637.

F2957

5201148

MANOJ VERMA

MITTAL VERMA

SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" category

638.

F2958

5201149

RAM SINGH

POORAN SINGH

SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" category

639.

F2959

5201150

SHUKVIR SINGH

PRATAP SINGH

SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" category

640.

F2960

5077080

ANOOP SINGH

DESHRAJ SINGH

SMT. GOMTI SMARAK VIGYAN MAHAVIDHYALA, PARSON, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

641.

F2965

5077085

RAJENDRA SINGH

NARAYAN SINGH

SMT. GOMTI SMARAK VIGYAN MAHAVIDHYALA, PARSON, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

642.

F2966

5077086

GEETA RANI

TEERAK PAL

SMT. GOMTI SMARAK VIGYAN MAHAVIDHYALA, PARSON, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

643.

F2967

5077087

NEERAJ KUMAR SHARMA

RAMESHCHANDRA SINGH

SMT. GOMTI SMARAK VIGYAN MAHAVIDHYALA, PARSON, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

644.

F2969

5077089

PRASOON RATOR

R.S. RATHOR

SMT. GOMTI SMARAK VIGYAN MAHAVIDHYALA, PARSON, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

645.

F2971

5077091

CHETANYA KUMAR

J.P. SHARMA

SMT. GOMTI SMARAK VIGYAN MAHAVIDHYALA, PARSON, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

646.

F2978

5077154

ANEETA SHARMA

SHRI CHANDRA SHARMA

SMT. GOMTI SMARAK VIGYAN MAHAVIDHYALA, PARSON, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

647.

F2980

5077156

KULDEEP VERMA

BADAN SINGH

SMT. GOMTI SMARAK VIGYAN MAHAVIDHYALA, PARSON, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

648.

F2983

5077159

TEJ PAL SINGH

KHERI SINGH

SMT. GOMTI SMARAK VIGYAN MAHAVIDHYALA, PARSON, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

649.

F2991

5148084

PREM PAL

BHOOP SINGH

SMT. LONGSHREE DEVI COLL, NAGLA AAL, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" category

650.

F3002

5148095

SACHIN KUMAR

SUKHPAL SINGH

SMT. LONGSHREE DEVI COLL, NAGLA AAL, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" category

651.

F3043

5082161

PAWAN KUMAR CHAUHAN

RAMESH CHANDRA CHAUHAN

SRI FAROOQ HUSSAIN (P.G.) COLLEGE, NIDHAULI KALAN, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

652.

F3044

5082162

HARENRA SINGH

BABU RAM

SRI FAROOQ HUSSAIN (P.G.) COLLEGE, NIDHAULI KALAN, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

653.

F3045

5082163

MAHENDRA PRATAP SINGH

BRAJ RAJ SIGH CHAUHAN

SRI FAROOQ HUSSAIN (P.G.) COLLEGE, NIDHAULI KALAN, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

654.

F3046

5082164

JITENDRA KUMAR SINGH

B.R. SAGAR

SRI FAROOQ HUSSAIN (P.G.) COLLEGE, NIDHAULI KALAN, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

655.

F3047

5082165

NEETU SINGH

BABU RAM SAGAR

SRI FAROOQ HUSSAIN (P.G.) COLLEGE, NIDHAULI KALAN, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

656.

F3054

5082306

AMIT KUMAR VARSHNEY

BANWARI LAL VARSHNEY

SRI FAROOQ HUSSAIN (P.G.) COLLEGE, NIDHAULI KALAN, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

657.

F3055

5082307

VIMLESH KUMARI

RAJA RAM

SRI FAROOQ HUSSAIN (P.G.) COLLEGE, NIDHAULI KALAN, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

658.

F3063

5227084

AJAY KUMAR SINGH

AMAR PAL SINGH

SRI GIRRAJ MAHARAJ COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

659.

F3066

5227087

NARENDRA SINGH

RAGHUVEER SINGH

SRI GIRRAJ MAHARAJ COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

660.

F3067

5227088

ANAND KUMAR SAKYA

RAM LAL SAKYA

SRI GIRRAJ MAHARAJ COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

661.

F3068

5227089

BIJENDRA KUMAR GAUTAM

CHARAN SINGH GAUTAM

SRI GIRRAJ MAHARAJ COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

662.

F3069

5227090

PRITI VERMA

LALARAM VERMA

SRI GIRRAJ MAHARAJ COLLEGE, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

663.

F3093

5181122

NIDHI SHARMA

JAGDISH SHARMA

SRI JAGVIR SINGH CHAUHAN SMRATI MAHAVIDHYALAY, ALIPUR, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

664.

F3094

5181123

LAXMI ARYA

BANWARI LAL

SRI JAGVIR SINGH CHAUHAN SMRATI MAHAVIDHYALAY, ALIPUR, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

665.

F3099

5181128

VINIT SINGH

CHETRAM SINGH

SRI JAGVIR SINGH CHAUHAN SMRATI MAHAVIDHYALAY, ALIPUR, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

666.

F3102

5181131

RUPENDRA KUMAR

ASHOK SINGH

SRI JAGVIR SINGH CHAUHAN SMRATI MAHAVIDHYALAY, ALIPUR, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

667.

F3103

5181132

SURAJ SINGH

P.D. YADAV

SRI JAGVIR SINGH CHAUHAN SMRATI MAHAVIDHYALAY, ALIPUR, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

668.

F3105

5181134

SUNIL KUMAR SINGH

MAHI PAL SINGH

SRI JAGVIR SINGH CHAUHAN SMRATI MAHAVIDHYALAY, ALIPUR, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

669.

F3109

5181138

HARENDRA

RADHA CHARNA

SRI JAGVIR SINGH CHAUHAN SMRATI MAHAVIDHYALAY, ALIPUR, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

670.

F3123

5278088

SATYANDRA KUMAR

GYAN SINGH

SRI POORAN PRASAD GUPTA MEMORIAL DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA HIGHWAY, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

671.

F3124

5278089

SARIKA

AMAR SINGH

SRI POORAN PRASAD GUPTA MEMORIAL DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA HIGHWAY, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

672.

F3125

5278090

SANJAY KUMAR

CHOOTE LAL

SRI POORAN PRASAD GUPTA MEMORIAL DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA HIGHWAY, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

673.

F3126

5278091

RAMESH SINGH

POTHI RAM

SRI POORAN PRASAD GUPTA MEMORIAL DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA HIGHWAY, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

674.

F3127

5278092

SHEEM KHITOLIYA

PRABHU DAYAL

SRI POORAN PRASAD GUPTA MEMORIAL DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA HIGHWAY, AGRA

Remain in the "Fake" category

675.

F3142

5197116

GAURAV SINGH

NARENDRA PAL SINGH

SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" category

676.

F3145

5197119

BIRENDRA SINGH

SARDAR SINGH

SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" category

677.

F3146

5197120

BANTI

SHER SINGH

SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" category

678.

F3147

5197121

HARI MOHAN SINGH

BACHCHU SINGH

SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" category

679.

F3148

5197122

GYNENDRA PRATAP SINGH

JAGDISH SINGH YADAV

SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" category

680.

F3149

5197123

AMIT SINGH

JITENDRA SINGH

SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" category

681.

F3151

5197125

SATISH KUMAR

RAJENDRA SINGH

SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" category

682.

F3153

5197127

AJAY KUMAR SINGH

SHYAM SINGH

SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" category

683.

F3168

5197142

VIMLESH YADAV

NEM SINGH

SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" category

684.

F3169

5197143

RAM SHANKER SINGH

AWADH NARAYAN

SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" category

685.

F3170

5197144

KULWANT KUMAR SINGH

H.S. SINGH

SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" category

686.

F3171

5197145

TEJ VEER SINGH

GOPAL SINGH

SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" category

687.

F3174

5197148

RAJ VIR SINGH

DORI LAL

SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" category

688.

F3175

5197149

SANDHYA

AMAR SINGH

SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" category

689.

F3178

5197308

MANOJ KUMAR PARIHAR

R.S. PARIHAR

SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" category

690.

F3189

5240117

SUSHIL KUMAR

RAJ BAHADUR

SRI SURAJ SINGH MEMORIAL COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

691.

F3195

5240123

ARVIND SRIVASTAVA

RAM GOPAL SRIVASTAVA

SRI SURAJ SINGH MEMORIAL COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

692.

F3200

5240128

MAMTA KUMARI

RAGHUNATH

SRI SURAJ SINGH MEMORIAL COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

693.

F3209

5240137

SUMAN SHARMA

G.S. SHARMA

SRI SURAJ SINGH MEMORIAL COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

694.

F3210

5240138

ANIL KUMAR

BALVIR SINGH

SRI SURAJ SINGH MEMORIAL COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

695.

F3211

5240139

KRISHAN KUMAR

DESH RAJ SINGH

SRI SURAJ SINGH MEMORIAL COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

696.

F3214

5240142

GANESH CHANDRA

PREETAM LAL

SRI SURAJ SINGH MEMORIAL COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

697.

F3216

5240144

SANGITA SINGH

S.P. SINGH

SRI SURAJ SINGH MEMORIAL COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

698.

F3219

5240147

YOGENDRA SINGH

RAM SHANKAR

SRI SURAJ SINGH MEMORIAL COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

699.

F3221

5240149

VISHNU KUMAR

RAM JI LAL SAVITA

SRI SURAJ SINGH MEMORIAL COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

700.

F3222

5240150

UMESH KUMAR

CHATRA PAL SINGH

SRI SURAJ SINGH MEMORIAL COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" category

701.

F3224

5242086

VISHRAM SINGH

A KUMAR

SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

702.

F3225

5242087

VIKAS CHANDRA

NAWAB SINGH

SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

703.

F3227

5242089

MUKESH BABU

MAHAVIR SINGH

SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

704.

F3228

5242090

HARI CHANDRA SINGH

DHANI RAM

SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

705.

F3235

5242116

VANDANA

JAGDISH BABU

SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" category

706.

F3236

5242117

BABITA KUMARI

MANIK CHAND

SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

707.

F 3237

5242118

UDAYA PRATAP SINGH

SUNHARI LAL

SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

708.

F3238

5242119

JITENDRA SINGH

CHANDRA BHAN

SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

709.

F3239

5242120

VIVEK KUMAR

DORI SINGH

SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

710.

F3240

5242121

SARLA KUMARI

JALIM SINGH

SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

711.

F3241

5242122

SARVESH KUMAR SINGH

POKH PAL SINGH

SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

712.

F3243

5242124

DEOKI PRASAD

BHUDEV SINGH

SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

713.

F3253

5242134

NIRJA RANI

J.P. SINGH

SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

714.

F3257

5242138

CHAMPA AGARWAL

RAM NIWAS AGARWAL

SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

715.

F3260

5242141

RAVINDRA KUMAR VERMA

RAM SWAROOP VERMA

SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

716.

F3270

5010069

BEENA

JAIPAL SINGH

T.R.K. COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

717.

F3272

5010071

PRIYANKA RANI

HEM SINGH

T.R.K. COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

718.

F3276

5010303

SUSHILA KUMARI

KOMAL SINGH

T.R.K. COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

719.

F3277

5010304

KRISHAN LATA YADAV

KAMAL SINGH YADAV

T.R.K. COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

720.

F3279

5010306

SEEMA VERMA

RAJ VIR SINGH

T.R.K. COLLEGE, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

721.

F3286

5209068

SUKRITI TIWARI

RAM CHANDRA TIWARI

USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

722.

F3289

5209071

ASHOK KUMAR

LAKHAN SINGH

USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

723.

F3290

5209072

RAJNISH SHARMA

GAURI SHANKER SHAMRA

USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

724.

F3291

5209073

PRATIBHA PUSHKAR

R.C. PUSHKAR

USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

725.

F3292

5209074

DHARVENDRA SINGH

GYANENDRA SINGH

USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

726.

F3298

5209080

JITENDRA SINGH

MAHENDRA SINGH

USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

727.

F3300

5209082

PUSHPENDRA KUMAR

AMOL SINGH

USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

728.

F3301

5209083

RAHUL YADAV

OM PRAKASH YADAV

USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

729.

F3312

5209094

PUSHPENDRA KUMAR

JAGDISH SINGH

USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

730.

F3317

5209138

LALITA SINGH

J.P. SINGH

USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

731.

F3318

5209139

PRATIBHA SINGH

J.P. SINGH

USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

732.

F3319

5209140

MEENA RANI

BRAJ LAL

USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

733.

F3321

5209142

MANJU SHARMA

R.P. SHARMA

USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

734.

F3323

5209144

PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH

MOHAR SINGH

USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

735.

F3326

5209147

JAI NARAYAN GUPTA

MUNNI LAL

USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

736.

F3328

5209149

CHANDRA PRATAP SINGH

B.R. SINGH

USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

737.

F3334

5209306

ARUN KUMAR SHARMA

RAJENDRA KISHORE SHARMA

USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

738.

F3336

5209308

KUSUM LATA

R.NIWAS

USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

739.

F3337

5209309

RAM PRATAP SINGH

NATHU SINGH

USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

740.

F3339

5209311

SATYA PRAKASH SINGH

MAHAVIR SINGH

USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA

Remain in the "Fake" Category

741.

F3342

5200083

SUNIL KUMAR

SUKHDEV SINGH

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

742.

F3343

5200084

SARVESH KUMAR

HEERA LAL

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

743.

F3345

5200086

SANTOSH

AJEET SINGH

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

744.

F3346

5200087

VIPIN KUMAR

RAMAKANT MISHRA

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

745.

F3347

5200088

AVINASH KUMAR SHARMA

HARI DATT SHARMA

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

746.

F3350

5200091

KAVITA

R.R. SINGH

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

747.

F3357

5200116

LAXMI YADAV

ARTI YADAV

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

748.

F3358

5200117

SEEMA CHAUDHARY

RAJEEV CHAUDHARY

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

749.

F3359

5200118

HARIOM

SIYA RAM SINGH

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

750.

F3360

5200119

VIJAY PAL SINGH

RAGHUVIR SINGH

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

751.

F3362

5200121

SHASHI JAISHWAL

MANIKCHAND

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

752.

F3366

5200125

SATENDRA KUMAR

MAHENDRA KUMAR SHARMA

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

753.

F3367

5200126

DEVENDRA KUMAR

SRI RAM PAL

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

754.

F3368

5200127

SATENDRA KUMAR

GOPAL SINGH

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

755.

F3369

5200128

SUNIL SHARMA

RAM AVATAR

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

756.

F3373

5200132

DUSHYANT SINGH

CHITRA SINGH

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

757.

F3374

5200133

LOKENDRA SINGH

MAHENDRA PAL SINGH

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

758.

F3375

5200134

RAM NIWASH

BABU RAM

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

759.

F3376

5200135

LALITASH

SANT RAM YADAV

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

760.

F3377

5200136

NARENRA PAL SINGH

BHOLA SHANKAR

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

761.

F3378

5200137

PUSHPA YADAV

KISHAN LAL

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

762.

F3379

5200138

KULDEEP KUMAR

SANTOSH KUMAR

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

763.

F3382

5200141

KAMLA DEVI

DAYA RAM 200

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

764.

F3383

5200142

ANURADHA KULSHRESTAH

P.L. KULSHRESTHA

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

765.

F3391

5200150

ASHA KUMARI

SHRI RAM DAYAL

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

766.

F3392

5200307

SHIV NANDAN SINGH

RAM SARAN

V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ

Remain in the "Fake" Category

767.

F3394

5071080

VIKITA

MINRAJ SINGH

VIRANGNA AVANTI BAI MAHILA MAHAVIDYALAYA, UDDAITPUR, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

768.

F3398

5071084

KM. PINKY

SIYA RAM

VIRANGNA AVANTI BAI MAHILA MAHAVIDYALAYA, UDDAITPUR, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

769.

F3399

5071085

SANTOSH KUMARI

RAM PRASAD

VIRANGNA AVANTI BAI MAHILA MAHAVIDYALAYA, UDDAITPUR, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

770.

F3413

5071123

PREM LATA

BHOOP SINGH

VIRANGNA AVANTI BAI MAHILA MAHAVIDYALAYA, UDDAITPUR, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

771.

F3419

5071129

KUSHU LATA

BHURE LAL

VIRANGNA AVANTI BAI MAHILA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, UDDAITPUR, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

772.

F3420

5071130

URMESH KUMARI

BISHRAM SINGH

VIRANGNA AVANTI BAI MAHILA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, UDDAITPUR, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

773.

F3424

5071134

PRATHAMA

RAM SINGH

VIRANGNA AVANTI BAI MAHILA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, UDDAITPUR, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

774.

F3425

5071135

ASHA RAJPUT

JHUMAK LAL

VIRANGNA AVANTI BAI MAHILA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, UDDAITPUR, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

775.

F3442

5196084

ABHILASHA SHARMA

ANIL KUMAR SHARMA

VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

776.

F3447

5196089

DHIRENDRA PAL SINGH

VIRENDRA SING

VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

777.

F3448

5196090

BITTAN DEVI

SEETA RAM

VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

778.

F3462

5196308

VIRENDRA PAL SINGH

HAJARI LAL

VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

779.

F3464

5196310

MANOJ CHAUHAN

K.S. CHAUHAN

VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

780.

F3465

5196311

VISHNU KUMAR SINGH

JASVIR SINGH

VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

781.

F3479

5176052

RAJESH PRATAP SINGH

RAVINDRA PAL SINGH

ZAKIR HUSSAIN COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

782.

F3481

5176054

VED VATI VERMA

POORAN SINGH

ZAKIR HUSSAIN COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

783.

F3482

5176055

DHARMENDRA PRAKASH DIXIT

RAM SEVAK DIXIT

ZAKIR HUSSAIN COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

784.

F3484

5176057

RAM KUMARI DWIVEDI

RAJ KUMAR

ZAKIR HUSSAIN COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

785.

F3486

5176059

OM PRAKSH

NATTHU RAM

ZAKIR HUSSAIN COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

786.

F 3237

5176061

RAVINDRA KUMAR

BALAK RAM

ZAKIR HUSSAIN COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

787.

F3489

5176062

JAI CHANDRA SINGH

RADHA SHYAM

ZAKIR HUSSAIN COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

788.

F3490

5176063

DEVENDRA SINGH

INDAL SINGH

ZAKIR HUSSAIN COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

789.

F3494

5176067

YADU NATH SINGH

ATAR SINGH

ZAKIR HUSSAIN COLLEGE, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

790.

F3503

5194085

UMA SHANKAR SINGH

RAGHUVEER SINGH

GRAMODHAR MAHAVIDHYALA,NAGLA PARSI DADU ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

791.

F3510

5181120

RAJKUMAR

GOPAL SINGH

SRI JAGVIR SINGH CHAUHAN SMRATI MAHAVIDHYALAY, ALIPUR, ETAH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

792.

F3512

5197302

RAJEEV KUMR

BABU RAM

SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAY,SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

793.

F3516

5196014

GAURAV VARSHNEY

ARVIND KUMAR VARSHNEY

VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

794.

F3517

5196017

SUNIL KUMAR

SURESH CHANDRA

VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

795.

F3518

5196019

MINTU SINGH

RAM CHARAN

VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

796.

F3519

5196022

ARPITA GUPTA

HARI OM GUPTA

VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

797.

F3522

5196028

GURU DAYAL SINGH

VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

798.

F3524

5196030

SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH

NARAYAN SINGH

VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

799.

F3527

5196036

DINESH KUMAR YADAV

MAHENDRA SINGH YADAV

VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

800.

F3529

5196040

TARA CHANDRA

RAM PRASAD

VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

801.

F3532

5196058

INDRA JEET

SHANKER LAL

VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

802.

F3536

5196048

HEM LATA

VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

803.

F3552

5079038

REETA GAUTAM

RAM SHANKAR

SHIVDAN SINGH SMRITI COLLEGE, IGLAS, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

804.

F3553

5079063

RAM KUMAR

MAHAVEER SINGH

SHIVDAN SINGH SMRITI COLLEGE, IGLAS, ALIGARH

Remain in the "Fake" Category

805.

F3557

5172306

SARAD KUMAR SINGH

SURENDRA KUMAR

AMARDEEP COLLEGE, FIROZABAD

Remain in the "Fake" Category

806.

F3577

5045118

SURENDRA SINGH

TOPI SINGH

PRAMOD MAHAVIDHYALAYA, MEHRARA, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

807.

F3578

5045119

GAJENDRA SINGH

RAM DAYAL SINGH

PRAMOD MAHAVIDHYALAYA, MEHRARA, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

808.

F3600

5045141

AZAD GULSHAN BANU

ALLAH BUX

PRAMOD MAHAVIDHYALAYA, MEHRARA, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

809.

F3606

5045147

VINOD KUMAR

PURAN SINGH

PRAMOD MAHAVIDHYALAYA, MEHRARA, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

810.

F3607

5045148

ALKA

TODI SINGH

PRAMOD MAHAVIDHYALAYA, MEHRARA, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

811.

F3534

5045012

ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

KESHAV PRASAD SRIVASTAVA

PRAMOD MAHAVIDHYALAYA, MEHRARA, HATHRAS

Remain in the "Fake" Category

812.

F3636

5243082

ANURADHA

RAJENDRA SINGH

ADARSH KRISHNA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, BHOOP NAGAR, MAINPURI

Remain in the "Fake" Category

(Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, J.) (Munishwar Nath Bhandari , J.)

Order Date-: 26.02.2021

Piyush/Ashish Pd./Nirmal