Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shivnath Ram vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others
2021 Latest Caselaw 10693 ALL

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10693 ALL
Judgement Date : 19 August, 2021

Allahabad High Court
Shivnath Ram vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 19 August, 2021
Bench: Pankaj Bhatia



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 6
 

 
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10434 of 2021
 

 
Petitioner :- Shivnath Ram
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- J.P.N. Singh
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
 

 
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.

The present writ petition, inter alia, has been filed with following prayer:

"a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the retiral, pensionery benefit to the petitioner in pursuance of Regulation 370 of Civil Service Regulation w.e.f. 1.7.2016, with interest."

The contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was initially appointed in the year 1974 and with effect from 1983, the petitioner continuously worked with the respondents. The services of the petitioner were regularised in the year 2011 and the petitioner retired in the year 2016.

The petitioner claims that he is entitled to pension computing the services rendered by the petitioner from 1983 till the year 2011 as qualifying services in the light of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Prem Singh Vs. State of UP, 2019 (10) SCC 516 as well as judgments of this Court in the case of State of UP and 4 others Vs. Bhanu Pratap Sharma (Special Appeal No. 97 of 2021 decided on 9.6.2021) and State of UP Through Secretary, Revenue Department and others Vs. Ram Sunder Ram (Special Appeal No. 1891 of 2009 decided on 23.8.2016.

Considering the fact that no orders have been passed with regard to pension of the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Respondent No. 3, who shall take a decision thereupon in respect of the entitlement of the petitioner by calculating the qualifying service rendered by the petitioner in the light of judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Prem Singh Vs. State of UP, 2019 (10) SCC 516 as well as judgments of this Court in the case of State of UP and 4 others Vs. Bhanu Pratap Sharma (Special Appeal No. 97 of 2021 decided on 9.6.2021) and State of UP Through Secretary, Revenue Department and others Vs. Ram Sunder Ram (Special Appeal No. 1891 of 2009 decided on 23.8.2016 with all expedition preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of filing of said representation and a web generated copy of this order before the Respondent No. 3.

Order Date :- 19.8.2021

vinay

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter