Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 5032 ALL
Judgement Date : 24 May, 2019
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 26324 of 2011 Petitioner :- Danish Iqbal Respondent :- Central Administrative Tribunal Allahabad And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajiv Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Vivek Singh,Ajay Singh,S.C. Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J.
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution on 17.04.2018.
The petitioner has applied for recall of the above order on the ground that case could not be marked and as such counsel could not appear before the Court. It has also been stated that the petitioner had no knowledge of the dismissal of the writ petition as no one was aware of the said dismissal.
The cause shown for the delay is held to be sufficient and since the absence is also explained, we condoned the delay in filing the recall application.
The Delay Condonation Application No.10 of 2018 as well as the Restoration Application No.11 of 2018 are allowed and the writ petition is directed to be restored to its original number subject to payment of cost of Rs.1,000/- which shall be deposited within two weeks' to be utilized for the benefit of litigants.
Order Date :- 24.5.2019
Pramod Tripathi
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!