Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 409 ALL
Judgement Date : 10 May, 2017
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 3 Case :- MISC. BENCH No. - 892 of 2013 Petitioner :- Oudh Gym Khana Club A Regd.Society Lko.Thr. Secy.C.P.Kackar Respondent :- Union Of India Thr.Secy.Ministry Of Finance,New Delhi & Anr. Counsel for Petitioner :- Ratnesh Chandra Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.,Alok Sharma,Rajesh Singh Chauhan Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Hon'ble Virendra Kumar-II,J.
1. After some argument Shri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for petitioner states that the dispute in this writ petition require investigation into fact, therefore, petitioner may avail remedy before the authority concerned and with the aforesaid liberty, writ petition may be dismissed.
2. To this request, Shri Alok Sharma, learned counsel for respondent has no objection.
3. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed with the aforesaid liberty.
Order Date :- 10.5.2017
Pachhere/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!