Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 3641 ALL
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2016
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 29409 of 2016 Petitioner :- Smt. Rakhi Raghav And 3 Ors. Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Shiva Nand Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pradeep Kumar Singh Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J.
Notice on behalf of respondents - 1 and 2 has been accepted by Chief Standing Counsel and on behalf of respondents - 3 and 4 has been accepted by Sri Pradeep Kumar Singh.
Issue notice to respondent-5.
The respondents are granted one month time to file counter affidavit. The petitioners will have three weeks thereafter to file rejoinder affidavit.
List thereafter.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioners were appointed with the approval of Basic Siksha Adhikari. Now one Member of Committee of Management has filed objection against appointment of the petitioners in which the inquiry is being conducted by the Assistant Director of Eduction (Basic), Meerut region, Meerut. Due to inquiry the Basic Siksha Adhikari has withheld the salary of the petitioners by the impugned order dated 13.5.2016. The submission of the counsel for the petitioners is that till today there is nothing adverse found against the petitioners as such salary of the petitioners cannot be withheld due to pendency of inquiry.
The matter requires consideration.
Till the next date of listing, the operation of the order dated 13.5.2016 shall remain stayed and the petitioners shall be paid salary from month to month.
Order Date :- 28.6.2016
Rahul /-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!