Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 4583 ALL
Judgement Date : 27 July, 2016
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 43 Case :- TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 491 of 2015 Applicant :- Smt. Naseem Fatma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Madan Ji Pandey,Arvind Kumar Vishwakarma,Vijay Kumar Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate Hon'ble Pratyush Kumar,J.
List has been revised. No one is present on behalf of the opposite parties.
Sri Arvind Kumar, Advocate, has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party No.2 but no counter affidavit has been filed. The other two opposite parties No.8 and 9 Sabnam alias Gudiya and Saziya have also been sufficiently served.
On behalf of the State it has been indicated that in the First Information Report there is one more accused Ashraf Khan. He has not been made party.
List in the next cause list.
Meanwhile, learned counsel for the applicant, if so advised, may do needful.
Order Date :- 27.7.2016
G.S
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!