Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 6739 ALL
Judgement Date : 19 September, 2014
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 50696 of 2014 Petitioner :- Paras Nath Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors Counsel for Petitioner :- A. Chaturvedi,Shashi Nandan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Sheo Kumar Singh,J.
Hon'ble Dinesh Maheshwari,J.
Argument is that against the order which has been referred in the impugned order, a revision has already been filed which is still pending, and therefore, on the premises that order passed by the petitioner was incorrect and that was to extend benefit to some of the persons, suspension is not at all justified.
Notices means for respondents have been accepted by learned Chief Standing Counsel.
Counter affidavit may be filed by the next date.
List this petition after six weeks.
As an interim measure, we direct that till the next date of listing operation of the order dated 3rd September, 2014 shall remain stayed. However, inquiry against the petitioner, if any, is to proceed in which petitioner undertakes to cooperate.
Order Date :- 19.9.2014
M.A.A.
( Dinesh Maheshwari, J.) ( S.K. Singh, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!