Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Harveer Singh And 3 Ors vs State Of U.P. And 4 Ors
2014 Latest Caselaw 6723 ALL

Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 6723 ALL
Judgement Date : 19 September, 2014

Allahabad High Court
Harveer Singh And 3 Ors vs State Of U.P. And 4 Ors on 19 September, 2014
Bench: Pradeep Kumar Baghel



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 1
 

 
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 48580 of 2014
 

 
Petitioner :- Harveer Singh And 3 Ors
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Ors
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Siddharth Khare,Ashok Khare
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Santosh Kumar
 

 
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.

The petitioners are four in number. They claim that they were appointed as Assistant Co-ordinators for a period of three years. After completion of three years, their services were not extended on the ground that they are not trained. 

The counsel for the petitioners has drawn attention of the Court to the Government Order dated 15.05.1997 and exemption orders passed in different dates in respect of petitioners. The said orders are on record record as Annexures- 2A, 2C and 2D of the writ petition and the clarification issued by the Secretary , Board of Education, UP, Allahabad dated 26.8.2014 wherein the Secretary has clarified that the teachers who have been exempted from training are entitled to the benefit at par withthe trained teachers. A copy of the order dated 26.8.2014 is annexed to the writ petition as Annexure-13.

Consdiering the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with the consent of learned standing counsel, leaving it open to the petitioners to file a fresh representation before the Basic Shiksha Adhikari, shahjahanpur (Respondent no. 5) alongwith all the documents mentioned hereinabove within ten days from today. In the event, such representation is filed within ten days, Respondent no. 5 shall consider it in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders expeditiously. However, till the such decision is taken by respondent no. 5, no fresh appointment shall be made in place of the petitioners. 

Order Date :- 19.9.2014

SKS

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter