Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 7215 ALL
Judgement Date : 29 November, 2013
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 23 Case :- U/S 482/378/407 No. - 6191 of 2013 Applicant :- Rama Kant Maurya Opposite Party :- The State Of U.P Thru Principal Secy., Home Lucknow And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- L.J Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Sudhir Kumar Saxena,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State.
This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the chargesheet submitted in Case Crime No. 30 of 2013, under Section 394 I.P.C., Police Station Sakaran, District Sitapur.
I have very carefully examined the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and gone through the record.
The chargesheet has been filed after investigation which is based on the relevant materials. The chargesheet can be quashed only on limited grounds which are absolutely lacking in the instant case, as such no interference is required to quash the impugned proceedings.
The petition lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed.
However, it is provided that if petitioner surrenders before the courts below within one month from today and applies for bail, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided by the courts below in view of the settled law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Till the aforesaid period or disposal of the bail application, whichever is earlier, no coercive measure shall be taken against the petitioner.
Order Date :- 29.11.2013
kkv/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!