Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 7162 ALL
Judgement Date : 27 November, 2013
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 64711 of 2013 Petitioner :- Rakesh Singh Respondent :- Chairman And Disciplinary Authority,Alld. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Gopal Verma Counsel for Respondent :- S.K.Kakkar Hon'ble Rajes Kumar,J.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that as per the Allahabad U.P. Gramin Bank (Adhikari & Karmachari) Service Rule, 2010, any Defence Assistance can be engaged with the prior permission under Rule 44. There is no bar that only the employee of the Bank can be appointed as Defence Assistance. The rejection of the prayer of the petitioner, denying the appointment of Sri Yogendra Kumar Mishra as the Defence Assistance on the ground that he is no more employee of the Bank, is not justified.
Sri S.K. Kakkar, learned counsel for the Bank requested that the matter may be taken up on Tuesday (3.12.2013) to enable him to seek instruction.
Put up on Tuesday (3.12.2013) as fresh.
Order Date :- 27.11.2013
OP
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!