Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 780 ALL
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2011
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 40238 of 2004 Petitioner :- Prem Bihari Lal Nigam Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru' Secy. Nagar Vikas & Ors. Petitioner Counsel :- S.K. Srivastava,A.K. Srivastava Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Amitava Lala,J.
Hon'ble Ashok Srivastava,J.
None appeared to press the petition in spite of repeated calls. It seems that the writ petition has become infructuous by the passage of time as such the petitioner has lost interest.
Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous without imposing any cost.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 1.4.2011
pks
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!