The Punjab and Haryana High while listening to a case involving a dispute over money objected to the mentioning of the religion of a person in the FIR and stated that it was a serious issue and further directed the Director General of Police, Haryana shall file his own affidavit as to what corrective measures will be taken up by the State of Haryana in this regard.

Brief Facts:

The court was listening to the case involving allegations pertaining to money disputes, during the course of which the court took cognizance of the fact that the religion of the person had been mentioned in the FIR.

Observations of the Court:

The court took cognizance of the language stated in the FIR and observed that the religion of a person had been mentioned in the FIR which was a serious issue. The court stated that a similar kind of issue also arose in the State of Punjab wherein the religion of a person was mentioned. The court stated that it had earlier taken cognizance with regard to mentioning the caste of a person in the FIR or other police proceedings but on the issue of religion, the matter came up before the court pertaining to the State of Punjab wherein an affidavit was filed by the Assistant Inspector General of Police that henceforth the religion of a person will not be mentioned after which the Director General of Police, Punjab had filed an affidavit with regard to the corrective measures being taken.

The court stated that the position pertaining to the mentioning of religion remains in Haryana as it is evident from the FIR in the present case and in view of this, the Director General of Police, Haryana shall file his own affidavit as to what corrective measures will be taken up by the State of Haryana in this regard, especially on the similar lines as that of the State of Punjab.

The decision of the Court:

The court listed the case on a further date for the purpose of affidavit.

Case Title: Shripriya Aggarwal vs. State of Haryana

Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri

Case No.: CRM-M-42778-2023

Advocate for the Applicant: Mr. Rohit Chandel

Advocate for the Respondent: Mr. Naveen Kumar Sheoran

Read Judgment @LatestLaws.com

Picture Source :

 
Kritika