The Supreme Court, in a ruling by a seven-judge bench, has held that arbitration clauses in unstamped agreements are enforceable. This decision marks a departure from the precedent set by a previous five-judge bench judgment in M/s. N.N. Global Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s. Indo Unique Flame Ltd. And Ors, where it was held that unstamped arbitration agreements were not enforceable under the law. The Court has overturned the earlier judgment and established a new legal perspective on the enforceability of unstamped arbitration agreements.
On April 25, 2023, the Supreme Court of India's Constitution Bench of five judges delivered a split verdict, with a 3:2 majority ruling that an arbitration agreement and an instrument containing such an agreement, subject to stamp duty but unstamped or insufficiently stamped, cannot be enforced. This decision is based on the premise that such a document does not qualify as a legally enforceable contract under Section 2(h) read with Section 2(g) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
The precedent set by a 3-judge bench in N.N. Global Mercantile Case had previously upheld the doctrine of separability, asserting that the arbitration agreement remains valid independently of the underlying contract's enforceability due to stamp duty issues. However, a conflicting view emerged in Vidya Drolia v. Durga Trading Corporation, leading to the matter being referred to the Constitution Bench for comprehensive deliberation.
In today's verdict, CJI Chandrachud noted the following:
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!