In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court has brought a long-standing trademark dispute between Theos and Theobroma bakeries to a close. The court issued a decree with certain clarifications, allowing for the peaceful coexistence of the two bakery entities.
Brief Facts of the Case:
The case at hand revolves around a trademark dispute involving two bakery entities, Theos Food Pvt. Ltd. ("Theos") and Theobroma Foods Pvt. Ltd. ("Theobroma"). Both parties were engaged in the business of producing and selling bakery-related products, patisseries, and confectionery.
The dispute primarily stemmed from the use of specific trademarks:
- The Plaintiff No. 1, Theos, asserted its rights to the marks "THEOS" and "THEO'S."
- The Defendant, Theobroma, claimed ownership of the mark "THEOBROMA."
Contentions of the Parties:
Theos, as the plaintiff, contended that it possesses the sole right to use the "THEOS" and "THEO'S" marks for its bakery products, with an emphasis on restricting this use to the Delhi-NCR region. Furthermore, Theos insisted that Theobroma should not employ the "THEOS" or "THEO'S" mark and should instead be confined to using "THEO" without the 'S.'
Conversely, Theobroma, as the defendant, asserted its ownership of the "THEOBROMA" mark and maintains its unrestricted right to use this mark. Additionally, Theobroma argued that it has utilized the "THEO'S" mark with the 'S' for a significant period and should not face limitations on its usage. Theobroma expressed concerns about the geographical constraint imposed on the use of its "THEOBROMA" mark, specifically within the Delhi-NCR region, as it may affect its ability to enforce rights outside this territory.
Observations by the Court:
The court permitted Theobroma to expand its outlets across India under the mark "THEOBROMA." However, it imposed a geographical restriction on Theos, confining its operations to the Delhi-NCR region for goods and services offered under the mark "THEOS" or "THEO'S."
The court considered the geographical limitation as a reasonable approach to address the potential for confusion or conflict between the two parties in different regions.
The court clarified that the geographical restriction on Theos's use of the mark "THEOS" or "THEO'S" to the Delhi-NCR region would not impede its statutory and common law rights to file oppositions and take legal action against the misuse of identical or similar marks in any part of India, except by Theobroma.
Theobroma was allowed to use the mark "THEOS" or "THEO'S" for specific bakery items, including Theos Dutch Truffle Cake, Theos Chocolate Mousse Cup, Theos Mava Cake, Theos Dense Loaf, and Theos Quiche. This usage was limited to physical and QR menu cards in Theobroma's physical outlets. The court believed that allowing Theobroma to use the mark for specific items in its physical outlets would not lead to confusion or trademark infringement.
Theos was prohibited from conducting online sales outside the Delhi-NCR region under the mark "THEOS" or "THEO'S." If Theos intended to expand its commercial activities beyond this region, it must use a different mark or name that was not identical or deceptively similar to "THEOBROMA."
The decision of the Court:
Both parties agreed not to oppose each other's marks or object to them, provided they complied with the terms of the settlement. Theobroma retained all its trademark registrations, including "THEOBROMA," "THEOS," and "THEO," and could take necessary enforcement actions.
Case Name: Theos Food Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. V. Theobroma Foods Pvt. Ltd.
Coram: Justice Prathiba M Singh
Case No.: C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 468/2022
Advocates of the Petitioners: Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Surya Rajappan & Mr. PDV Srikar, Advs.
Advocates of the Respondent: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Sr. Adv with Mr. Rahul Vidhani, Mr. Manoj K. Menda.
Read Judgment @LatestLaws.com
Picture Source :