Recently, the Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, ruling that a driver’s expired licence remained legally valid under the statutory thirty-day grace period, and rejected the Insurance Company’s plea for recovery rights. The Court emphasized that statutory provisions under Section 14 of the Motor Vehicles Act protect insurers from claiming recovery if the accident occurs within the grace period.
The appeal arose from a motor accident case where the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jind, had awarded compensation to the claimants and held the Insurance Company liable without granting recovery rights. The Insurance Company challenged the award, arguing that the driver of the offending vehicle did not hold a valid driving licence on the date of the accident, as his licence had expired prior to the incident and was only renewed later.
The Insurance Company contended that the driver’s licence had expired before the accident, resulting in a breach of policy conditions, and that it was therefore entitled to recover the compensation paid from the driver. The insurer argued that the Tribunal erred in holding it liable without considering the driver’s unlicensed status at the time of the accident.
The respondent, representing the vehicle owner, countered that the licence remained valid under the statutory proviso to Section 14 of the Motor Vehicles Act, which provides a 30 extension from the date of expiry. Counsel emphasized that the driver’s licence expired on June 4, 2001, but the statutory grace period extended its validity until midnight on July 4, 2001, the day of the accident. Therefore, the driver was legally licensed at the time of the incident.
The Court examined the proviso to Section 14, stating, "A plain reading of the proviso indicates that every driving licence, notwithstanding its expiry, continues to remain effective for a period of thirty days from such expiry. In the present case, the licence expired on 04.06.2001, and the statutory thirty-day period commenced on 05.06.2001, extending validity till 04.07.2001. The accident occurred within this period, and thus, the licence was legally effective."
The Court also referred to precedents, including State of Haryana v. Karkor and Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Santosh Kumari, affirming that an insurer cannot claim recovery merely because the licence had expired within the statutory window. The Court highlighted that the Insurance Company’s plea lacked merit and the Tribunal’s findings required no interference.
The Court dismissed the Insurance Company’s appeal and affirmed the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jind. Any pending applications related to the matter were also disposed of.
Case Title: National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Satbir and Others
Case No.: FAO No. 1479 of 2003(O&M)
Citation: 2025 Latest Caselaw 5474 P&H
Coram: Justice Virinder Aggarwal
Advocate for Petitioner: Adv. Harjinder Singh
Advocate for Respondent: Adv. M.K.Sood
Read Judgment @Latestlaws.com
Picture Source :