Recently, in a significant ruling on matrimonial rights, the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has held that preventing a wife from entering the kitchen of her matrimonial home can amount to mental cruelty under Section 498A of the IPC. While the Court declined to quash criminal proceedings against the husband, it granted relief to the mother-in-law, finding no specific allegations against her, drawing a clear line between substantiated claims and vague accusations.
The case stemmed from a complaint filed by a woman alleging sustained harassment after her marriage. She accused her husband of controlling her movements, restricting her access to her parental home, and subjecting her to degrading treatment, including barring her from cooking and forcing her to arrange food from outside. The husband, in his defence, claimed the FIR was retaliatory in nature following his divorce petition and argued that the allegations lacked substance. However, the prosecution maintained that the complaint disclosed a consistent pattern of mental harassment.
Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke found that the allegations against the husband were detailed and disclosed conduct capable of causing mental trauma, sufficient to attract provisions of cruelty. The Court notably observed, “She was even not allowed to enter the kitchen, and she was asked to bring the food from outside,” treating such acts as indicative of psychological abuse. At the same time, it cautioned against indiscriminate prosecution of family members, noting that the claims against the mother-in-law were “general and omnibus” without concrete particulars.
Consequently, while the case against the husband will proceed, the FIR and related proceedings against the mother-in-law were quashed.
Disclaimer: This news/ article includes information received via a syndicated news feed. The original rights remain with the respective publisher.
Picture Source :