Recently, the Allahabad High Court held that the constitutional right of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions under Article 30(1) of the Constitution does not extend to claiming exemption from reasonable State regulations aimed at maintaining academic standards. The Court clarified that minority status cannot be invoked to sidestep lawful directives issued to ensure the quality and integrity of education.
The case stemmed from a government order dated May 20, which laid down detailed procedures and qualification criteria for appointments in madrassas. Despite categorical directions mandating strict adherence to these norms, the management of the institution proceeded to advertise five posts of assistant teachers and one post of clerk, disregarding the State’s regulatory instructions.
Finding this action contrary to both the government policy and binding judicial directions, the Court noted that “the manager had acted in contravention of the order of the Supreme Court and the government policy.” It consequently quashed the recruitment advertisement issued by the madrassa authorities.
Justice Manju Rani Chauhan allowed a petition filed by the management committee of Madrassa Arabiya Shamshul Uloom Sikariganj Ehata Nawab and another, quashing recruitment advertisements issued for the posts of assistant teachers and a clerk in contravention of government orders. The Court found that the madrassa had proceeded with the selection process without awaiting the State’s prescribed qualification norms for teachers, rendering the advertisement “bad in the eyes of law and in violation of Article 30(1) of the Constitution.”
The Court examined whether the right of minority institutions to administer their affairs is absolute. It observed that while Article 30(1) of the Constitution guarantees the autonomy of minority institutions, such autonomy is not unfettered and “must be exercised within the parameters of reasonable regulations framed by the State for ensuring academic excellence and maintaining standards of education.”
The Court thereby upheld the State’s authority to regulate recruitment processes in minority-run institutions where such measures are intended to safeguard educational quality.
The Court further held that any appointments made pursuant to the impugned advertisement were “per se illegal,” and clarified that such appointees “do not have a right to raise objections or to be heard.”
Disclaimer: This news/ article includes information received via a syndicated news feed. The original rights remain with the respective publisher.
Picture Source :