AO/311/2025

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 952 UK
Judgement Date : 12 February, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Uttarakhand High Court

AO/311/2025 on 12 February, 2026

Author: Ravindra Maithani
Bench: Ravindra Maithani
                Office Notes,
             reports, orders or
SL.           proceedings or
      Date                                         COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No             directions and
             Registrar's order
              with Signatures
D1-
16                                IA No.1 of 2025 for Delay Condonation Application
                                  In
                                  AO No.311 of 2025
                                  Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J.

Mr. M.S. Bhandari, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Gaurav Panwar, Advocate holding brief of Ms. Prabha Naithani, Advocate for the respondent no.3.

The appellants have challenged the award dated 07.06.2024, passed in in MAC No.07 of 2020, Smt. Sita Devi and Others Vs. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited and Another, by the court of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/District Judge, Pauri Garhwal.

The appellants are claimants. They seek enhancement of the award amount.

It is delayed. The Delay Condonation Application, IA No.1 of 2025, has been filed.

Heard.

Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants are aged parents; they came to know about the connected appeal when the notices were served upon them. Then they decided to file the appeal, and in that process, delay occurred.

The respondent nos.1 and 2 is not represented today. They have not filed any objection to the delay condonation application. The respondent no.3 is, in fact, a claimant, who happens to be the wife of the deceased Having considered, this Court is of the view that there are good grounds to condone the delay.

The delay in preferring the appeal is condoned.

The delay condonation application is allowed.

Let call for the LCR.

List this matter for final hearing on 18.04.2026.

(Ravindra Maithani J.) 12.02.2026 RV